This study was designed to evaluate the effect of two dose levels of NUC-1031 (500 mg/m2 and 750mg/m2) in patients with ovarian cancer. The primary objective was to determine the anti-tumor activity of NUC-1031 at the selected dose level (500 mg/m2 or 750 mg/m2).
A total of 53 patients were randomized, of whom 51 patients were treated in Part I of the study, 24 patients in the 500 mg/m2 arm and 27 patients in the 750 mg/m2 arm. Eligible, consenting patients received NUC-1031 by IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Patients continued to receive NUC-1031 until the occurrence of disease progression and underwent imaging every 8 weeks. After disease progression, patients were followed for overall survival. Part II of the study was designed to select one of the treatment dose levels for further evaluation based on clinical and laboratory assessments of patients recruited in Part I. Despite promising efficacy and a good tolerability profile in Part I, it was decided not to initiate Part II as the pre-specified boundary for efficacy was uncertain to be met in this heavily pre-treated population with significant co-morbidities.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
53
NUC-1031 500 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle.
NUC-1031 750 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle
Arizona Oncology Associates, PC - HAL
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Arizona Oncology Associates, PC - HOPE
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Best Overall Response
Best overall response to study treatment, as assessed by blinded independent central review according to RECIST v1.1, in the evaluable population of patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had measurable disease at baseline. Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor markers, and pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measurements \<10 mm. Partial Response (PR): ≥30% decrease in the sum of measures of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Non-target lesions must be non-progressive disease. Stable Disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters on study. Progressive Disease (PD): ≥20% increase in the sum of measured lesions taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study and an absolute increase of ≥5mm.
Time frame: Assessed from date of randomization until disease progression, up to end of the study (approximately 2 years)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, LLP
Lakewood, Colorado, United States
Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Minnesota Oncology Hematology, P.A.
Edina, Minnesota, United States
SCRI - HCA Health Midwest
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Nashville Tennessee Oncology
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Texas Oncology - South Austin
Austin, Texas, United States
Texas Oncology The Woodlands, Gynecologic Oncology
The Woodlands, Texas, United States
Texas Oncology - Tyler
Tyler, Texas, United States
...and 7 more locations