This is a multi-site, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the acute efficacy of brexpiprazole or placebo in combination with intranasal ketamine added to ongoing, stable, and adequate antidepressant therapy (ADT) in the treatment of adults with Major Depressive Disorder with Treatment Resistant Depression.
This is a five-site, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the acute efficacy of oral brexpiprazole or placebo combined with intranasal ketamine added to ongoing, stable, and adequate antidepressant therapy (ADT) in the treatment of adults with MDD with TRD. Adequate ADT is defined as a therapeutically sufficient dose for a sufficient treatment period, which would be expected to be effective as listed in the MGH ATRQ.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
51
Administration of up to 3mg brexpiprazole
administration 6 times over two weeks of inhaled ketamine
Administration of placebo which matches brexpiprazole in size and number of tablets per dose
Collaborative Neuroscience Network, LLC.
Garden Grove, California, United States
Pacific Research Partners, LLC
Oakland, California, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital, Depression Clinical and Research Program
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Change From Baseline on Symptoms of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ)
Superiority will be demonstrated by a statistically significant greater decrease (p\<0.05, 2 sided) on the SDQ total score for participants receiving brexpiprazole versus placebo therapy. Symptoms of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ): This validated self-rating instrument has 44 items on a scale of 1-6, measuring multiple depressive symptom domains, with higher scores indicating worse depression symptoms. Participants reported on their experiences over the past three days.
Time frame: SDQ was assessed on Days 0, 1, 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 21, 23, 28
Long-term Sustained Response, as Measured by Achieving a 50% Reduction on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) on Day 28 (Number and Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Response Reported)
The table below compares percentages of participants in each arm who achieved a 50% or greater reduction on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) on Day 28 compared with baseline. This 10- item clinician-rated instrument measures depression severity with higher scores indicating more severity. Each item can be scored from 0 to 6 for a total sore range of 0 to 60. It was administered with a structured interview guide. Experiences over the past 3 days were rated.
Time frame: MADRS was assessed on Days 0, 2, 3, 8, 11, 14, 17, 21, 23, 28; 50% reduction compared Day 28 to Baseline.
Efficacy on Secondary Outcome Variables
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS):This 10-item clinician-rated instrument measures depression severity. Total score range of 0-60 with higher scores indicating more severity. 6-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D6): This instrument is completed with a structured interview guide by the clinician based on his/her assessment of the patient's symptoms, with higher scores indicating worse depression. Scores range from 0-22. Experiences were rated based on the past 3 days. Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scales: These clinician-rated scales rate the severity of the disorder and the global improvement since beginning of the study. Further information is in the baseline measures section.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Orangeburg, New York, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
Time frame: These secondary outcome variables were assessed on Days 0, 1 (except for MADRS this day), 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 21, 23, 28
Safety and Tolerability Outcomes: Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs (Elevated Blood Pressure)
Blood pressure was measured during each administration of ketamine, occurring on days 0, 5, 8, 11, 14, and 21. This vital sign was measured 6 times following the intranasal administration of ketamine: 15 minutes post dose, 30 minutes post dose, 45 minutes post dose, 1 hour post dose, 90 minutes post dose, and 2 hours post dose. Average blood pressure per group was assessed. Medical staff monitoring the ketamine administration were prepared to treat increases in blood pressure greater than 180/110 mm Hg or follow their institutional guidelines if more conservative, if these elevations did not resolve spontaneously within a short time period. Data presented are number of participants with elevated blood pressure at any of the listed time points.
Time frame: Blood pressure was measured during each administration of ketamine, occurring on days 0, 5, 8, 11, 14, and 21. This vital sign was measured 6 times following the intranasal administration of ketamine: 15 minutes post dose, 30 minutes post dose, 45 minutes
Safety and Tolerability Outcomes: Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs (Elevated Heart Rate)
Heart rate was measured during each administration of ketamine, occurring on days 0, 5, 8, 11, 14, and 21. This vital sign was measured 6 times following the intranasal administration of ketamine: 15 minutes post dose, 30 minutes post dose, 45 minutes post dose, 1 hour post dose, 90 minutes post dose, and 2 hours post dose. Average heart rate per group was assessed. Medical staff monitoring the ketamine administration were prepared to treat heart rate greater than 110 bpm, or follow their institutional guidelines if more conservative, if these elevations did not resolve spontaneously within a short time period. Data presented are number of participants with elevated heart rate at any of the listed time points.
Time frame: Heart rate was measured during each administration of ketamine, occurring on days 0, 5, 8, 11, 14, and 21.
Safety and Tolerability Outcomes: 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) - Total Number of Abnormal ECGs
Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were conducted at baseline, and follow-up visits conducted 5, 8, 11, 14, and 21 days after baseline. Any found to be abnormal were evaluated by a clinician as to the clinical significance of the ECG abnormality.
Time frame: ECGs were conducted at baseline and 5, 8, 11, 14, and 21 days after baseline
Safety and Tolerability Outcomes: 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) - Number of Participants With Abnormal ECGs
Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were conducted at baseline, and follow-up visits conducted 5, 8, 11, 14, and 21 days after baseline. Any found to be abnormal were evaluated by a clinician as to the clinical significance of the ECG abnormality.
Time frame: ECGs were conducted at baseline and 5, 8, 11, 14, and 21 days after baseline
Safety and Tolerability Outcomes: Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Test Results
Chemistry and CBC laboratory tests were obtained during the screening visit and on Day 14 and 28 follow-ups. If a test result was abnormal (i.e., outside of the site-specific pre-specified range of expected values), it was evaluated by a clinician as to its clinical significance.
Time frame: Chemistry and CBC laboratory tests were obtained during screening and on Day 14 and 28 follow-ups
Safety and Tolerability Outcomes: Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (Number of Participants Reporting)
Adverse events were recorded on a rolling basis from screening until the last day of the study (i.e., Day 28). For patients who reported any AEs, the average number of AEs per person per group were recorded. Site investigators rated whether AEs were possibly or probably related to treatment.
Time frame: Adverse events were recorded on a rolling basis from screening through Day 28
Safety and Tolerability Outcomes: Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (Average Number Per Person Per Group)
Adverse events were recorded on a rolling basis from screening until the last day of the study (i.e., Day 28). For patients who reported any adverse events, the mean number of adverse events per person per group were calculated and are reported below.
Time frame: The outcome was recorded on a rolling basis from screening through Day 28
Safety and Tolerability Outcomes: Suicidal Ideation and Behavior
The clinician rated behavioral module of the Concise Health Risk Tracking (CHRT) scale was used at each study visit to identify suicidal ideation and behavior. The first item assesses suicidal ideation. All subsequent items assess suicidal behavior. The below table is for Item 1.
Time frame: The CHRT was used at each study visit through Day 28