The purpose of the proposed study is to compare the sensitivity and specificity of three oculomotor test devices in normal subjects versus subjects with history of TBI. The study is designed as a prospective research project in which a group of 120 normal controls without a history of TBI will be compared to another group of 120 participants (total of 240) who have a confirmed history of TBI. Each participant will complete the TBI assessment protocol for each of three separate devices (Neuro Kinetics, SyncThink, and Oculogica). The order of the devices will be counter-balanced across participants. Participants will also be screened for vestibular migraine and visual vertigo, which are two conditions that influence oculo-vestibular perception in normal and TBI patients and might influence the results from the three oculomotor devices. Data from each device will be utilized to perform AUC analyses to determine the respective sensitivity and specificity for each.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
201
Testing with PAS device
Testing with Oculogica EyeBox device
Testing with SyncThink EyeSync device
National Intrepid Center of Excellence
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Area Under the Curve (AUC)
Determination of sensitivity/specificity measure for each device using known characteristics of arms (i.e., history of TBI vs no history of TBI)
Time frame: Single test session (1.5 hours) - all testing performed at time of study enrollment, will be reported at conclusion of data collection as all data is required to generate AUCs.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.