An observational study to investigate the compliance of home nebulizer therapy among children aged 0-14 years old clinically diagnosed with asthma
Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood and the leading causes of childhood morbidity from chronic disease (GINA 2016). It is clear that inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is foundation of asthma treatment and recommended both in Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and Chinese paediatric asthma diagnosis and treatment guideline. But the well-controlled rate of asthma was not ideal. National Parents of Asthmatic Children KAP Project Team (China) showed that 66.0% asthmatic children had asthma attacks in the past 12 months, 26.8% asthmatic children had visited the emergency department and 16.2% asthmatic children had been hospitalized. (Asthmatic Children KAP project team, 2013) .A few studies showed an increased risk of uncontrolled asthma or an asthma exacerbation in children with lower compliance (Jentzsch NS, 2012; Milgrom H, 1996). Poor compliance to inhaled corticosteroids may also contribute to poor asthma control level and asthma mortality (GINA 2016). Home nebulizer therapy has been recommended in GINA and Chinese Paediatric asthma diagnosis and treatment guideline. Compare to other inhalers, delivering ICS through nebulizer therapy need minimal patient's cooperation and normal breathing pattern (Deborah Elliott, 2011), but there are no studies to show the compliance of home nebulizer therapy in Chinese clinical practice. So we aim to investigate the compliance to home nebulizer therapy, and try to explore the related risk factor with poor compliance in this study.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
512
Facility
Bengbu, Anhui, China
Facility
Hefei, Anhui, China
Facility
Lanzhou, Gansu, China
Facility
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Median treatment compliance (%) derived using actual treatment frequency (monitored by electronic chips) divided by prescribed frequency
Time frame: From 3 June 2017 to 3 March 2018, an expected average of 3 months
Proportion of patients in different treatment compliance levels (<50%, 50 %≤-< 80%, 80%≤-≤120%, >120%) monitored by electric chips
Time frame: From 3 June 2017 to 3 March 2018, an expected average of 3 months
Median treatment compliance (%) reported by caregivers derived using actual doses divided by prescribed doses
Time frame: From 3 June 2017 to 3 March 2018, an expected average of 3 months
Proportion of patients in difference compliance levels reported by caregivers
Time frame: From 3 June 2017 to 3 March 2018, an expected average of 3 months
Proportion of patients by severity
Time frame: From 3 June 2017 to 3 March 2018, an expected average of 3 months
Factors associated with treatment compliance
Time frame: From 3 June 2017 to 3 March 2018, an expected average of 3 months
The proportion of asthma control status (controlled, partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma) according to GINA 2016 definition at visit 2 to 4 overall and by compliance level.
Time frame: From 3 June 2017 to 3 March 2018, an expected average of 3 months
The proportion of asthma control status according to TRACK for subjects under 5 years old
Time frame: From 3 June 2017 to 3 March 2018, an expected average of 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Nanjing Children's Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Facility
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Facility
Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
Facility
Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
Facility
Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
Facility
Shenyang, Liaoning, China
...and 2 more locations
Factors associated with control levels (controlled, partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma)
Time frame: From 3 June 2017 to 3 March 2018, an expected average of 3 months