This study evaluates the performance of "CRYOBEAUTY MAINS", a Cyto-selective Cryotherapy based on Difluoroethane as a treatment of Solar Lentigines in 30 volunteers. Only one application of "CRYOBEAUTY MAINS" in one hand (right or left hand according to the randomization code).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
30
CYOBEAUTY MAINS diffuses Difluoroethane gas to the skin. The administration of the cryogenic gas is temperature controlled, accurate and contactless (by means of a spray nozzle), in small quantity (\<1g) and during a predetermined short duration (3 seconds)
Cpcad Nice Hôpital Archet 2
Nice, France
Evaluation of CRYOBEAUTY MAINS's performance
Hexsel scoring: 1. \> Very significant clearance (about 90%); only minor evidence of hyper pigmentation remains 2. \> Significant improvement (about 75%); some evidence of hyper pigmentation remains 3. \> Intermediate between marked and slight improvement; about 50% improvement in the appearance of hyper pigmentation 4. \> Some improvement (about 25%); however, significant evidence of hyper pigmentation remains 5. \> Hyperpigmentation has not changed since baseline 6. \> Worse (hyperpigmentation is worse than at baseline)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Evaluation of solar lentigines numbers
Counting by enumeration of spots
Time frame: 0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Evaluation of solar lentigines numbers
Counting by enumeration of spots
Time frame: 4 weeks
Evaluation of solar lentigines numbers
Counting by enumeration of spots
Time frame: 8 weeks
Evaluation of solar lentigines colors
Colors assessment: by using Mexameter® MX 18
Time frame: 0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Evaluation of solar lentigines colors
Colors assessment: by using Mexameter® MX 18
Time frame: 4 weeks
Evaluation of solar lentigines colors
Colors assessment: by using Mexameter® MX 18
Time frame: 8 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Assessment of pain intensity
VAS
Time frame: 0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Complication and adverse events rate
Any complications or adverse events related or not to the treatment will be collected and evaluated.
Time frame: 0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Complication and adverse events rate
Any complications or adverse events related or not to the treatment will be collected and evaluated.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Complication and adverse events rate
Any complications or adverse events related or not to the treatment will be collected and evaluated.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Assessment of ergonomic and device's readiness
Ergonomic and device's readiness questionnaire : 6 QCM questions are given to the participants
Time frame: 0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Assessment of volunteers feeling (QoL)
MelasQoL (Melasma. Quality of Life Scale)
Time frame: 0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Assessment of volunteers feeling (QoL)
MelasQoL (Melasma. Quality of Life Scale)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of volunteers feeling (QoL)
MelasQoL (Melasma. Quality of Life Scale)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Evaluation of CRYOBEAUTY MAINS's performance
Hexsel scoring: 1. \> Very significant clearance (about 90%); only minor evidence of hyper pigmentation remains 2. \> Significant improvement (about 75%); some evidence of hyper pigmentation remains 3. \> Intermediate between marked and slight improvement; about 50% improvement in the appearance of hyper pigmentation 4. \> Some improvement (about 25%); however, significant evidence of hyper pigmentation remains 5. \> Hyperpigmentation has not changed since baseline 6. \> Worse (hyperpigmentation is worse than at baseline)
Time frame: 0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Evaluation of CRYOBEAUTY MAINS's performance
Hexsel scoring: 1. \> Very significant clearance (about 90%); only minor evidence of hyper pigmentation remains 2. \> Significant improvement (about 75%); some evidence of hyper pigmentation remains 3. \> Intermediate between marked and slight improvement; about 50% improvement in the appearance of hyper pigmentation 4. \> Some improvement (about 25%); however, significant evidence of hyper pigmentation remains 5. \> Hyperpigmentation has not changed since baseline 6. \> Worse (hyperpigmentation is worse than at baseline)
Time frame: 4 weeks