The purpose of this trial was to demonstrate that the efficacy of two treatment arms of the fixed-dose combination product QVM149 was non-inferior to the efficacy of the free combination arm of salmeterol/ fluticasone+ tiotropium in uncontrolled moderate to severe asthmatic patients. The planned duration of treatment in this study was 24 weeks, followed up by a 7-day follow-up period.
This study used a randomized, partially-blinded, 24-week, parallel-group, non-inferiority, open-label active controlled design. The study was partially open-label. Investigators and patients had knowledge of treatment allocation between QVM149 and/or comparator, however the QVM149 strength allocation was masked. The global sponsor team responsible for data review and analysis was blinded to all treatment allocations The study consisted of a screening period of up to 1-week, run-in period of 2-weeks, randomized treatment period of 24-weeks, and a follow-up period of 1-week. At the screening visit, informed consent was obtained, and current and prohibited medications were reviewed. Rescue medication was provided to all patients who met the eligibility criteria and was to be used on an "as needed" basis throughout the study. At the run-in visit, inclusion and exclusion criteria were reviewed and the patients were supplied with open-label long acting β2-adrenergic agonist/inhaled corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) salmeterol/fluticasone 50/250 μg b.i.d or 50/500 μg b.i.d to match their ICS background medication dose to be stopped at randomization visit. All patients who met the eligibility criteria were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms with a randomization ratio of 1:1:1. The patients were stratified at randomization according to the ICS dose component of background ICS/LABA (medium or high dose) and region. Treatment period visits were scheduled every 8 weeks. The study used two doses of QVM149 (high dose \[150/50/160 μg\] and a medium dose \[150/50/80 μg\] o.d. delivered via Concept1 inhaler) and a comparator treatment (salmeterol/fluticasone 50/500 μg b.i.d. delivered via Accuhaler® plus tiotropium 5 μg o.d delivered via Respimat®). All randomized patients were contacted (by telephone) 7 days following the last dose of study medication or last visit, whichever was later, for Safety Follow-up visit.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
1,426
Indacaterol acetate / glycopyrronium bromide / mometasone furoate
Free triple arm of salmeterol / fluticasone plus tiotropium
Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Total Score
The AQLQ is a 32-item asthma specific questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to patients with asthma, with a recall time of two weeks and each question to be answered on a 7-point scale, where 1=totally limited/problems all the time and 7= not at all limited/no problems. It consists of 4 domains: symptoms, activity limitation, emotional funtion, and emotional stimuli. The overall score is calculated as the mean of 32 items. Higher AQLQ scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)
FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured through spirometry testing. Trough FEV1 is the mean of two FEV1 values measures taken 15 minutes (min) and 45 min prior to evening dose.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 16 and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) Total Score
The ACQ-7 measured asthma symptom control and consists of 7 items: 5 on symptom assessment, 1 on rescue medication use and 1 on airway calibre (FEV1 % predicted). All seven items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating total control and 6 indicating poor control. The questions are equally weighted and the total score is the mean of the seven items. Higher score indicates worst symptoms. The first 6 questions of the ACQ-7 were completed by the participant while the last question was completed by the study investigator using data from the Master Scope spirometer. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in lung function.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 24
Change From Baseline in AQLQ Total Score
The AQLQ is a 32-item asthma specific questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to patients with asthma, with a recall time of two weeks and each question to be answered on a 7-point scale, where 1=totally limited/problems all the time and 7= not at all limited/no problems. It consists of 4 domains: symptoms, activity limitation, emotional function and environmental stimuli. The overall score is calculated as the mean of 32 items. Higher AQLQ scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Novartis Investigative Site
Berazategui, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Florida, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Lanus, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Nueve de Julio, Buenos Aires, Argentina
...and 153 more locations
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Patients Achieving the Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) Decrease From Baseline ACQ-7 ≥ 0.5
The ACQ-7 measured asthma symptom control and consists of 7 items: 5 on symptom assessment, 1 on rescue medication use and 1 on airway calibre (FEV1 % predicted). All seven items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating total control and 6 indicating poor control. The questions are equally weighted and the total score is the mean of the seven items. Higher score indicates worst symptoms. The first 6 questions of the ACQ-7 were completed by the participant while the last question was completed by the study investigator using data from the Master Scope spirometer. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in lung function. Decrease of ACQ-7 score of at least 0.5 from baseline was considered clinically meaningful.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Patients Achieving the Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) Change From Baseline AQLQ ≥ 0.5
The AQLQ is a 32-item asthma specific questionnaire designed to measure functional impairments that are most important to patients with asthma, with a recall time of two weeks and each question to be answered on a 7-point scale, where 1=totally limited/problems all the time and 7= not at all limited/no problems. It consists of 4 domains: symptoms, activity limitation, emotional function and environmental stimuli. The overall score is calculated as the mean of 32 items. Higher AQLQ scores indicate better health-related quality of life. An improvement of 0.5 points in AQLQ score is considered to be the minimally clinically important difference in asthma.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
FVC is the total volume of air exhaled during a expiratory maneuvre. It was assessed by performing a spirometry assessment.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 16 and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Flow Between 25% and 75% of Forced Vital Capacity (FEF25-75)
Forced expiratory flow during the mid (25 - 75%) portion of the FVC. It was assessed by performing spirometric assessment.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 16 and Week 24