The treatment of the acute phase of the complicated abscess tubo-ovarian relies on antibiotics more or less associated with surgical management in case of visible abscess, poor clinical tolerance (sepsis) and resistance to medical treatment. The CNGOF recommended in 2012 that the tubo-ovarian abscess are not within one antibiotic, and should be drained by interventional radiology, preferably by transvaginal or laparoscopic. Furthermore the efficiency of drainage by ultrasound puncture performed vaginally was demonstrated. This approach tends to replace the first laparoscopy because of its less invasive, fast, easy to access, more acceptable and less cost compared to laparoscopy. This approach is recommended by the French and English colleges. In total, the surgery in case of ATO is necessary, it is always coupled with antibiotics. Several surgical approaches are possible, laparotomy, laparoscopy and ultrasound-guided puncture. No prospective comparative study has been done, for which we want to develop this study.
Retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy of these two supported relate the same cure rates between the two techniques. According to the literature of Garbin O.and al in 2012, the success rate of transvaginal puncture is generally 93.6%. The largest series of Gjelland al in 2005 and covers 302 consecutive patients with ATO who underwent triple antibiotic therapy and transvaginal puncture, the success rate was 93.4%. The failures that required surgical management have frequently revealed endometriosis or cancer. To support laparoscopic, Raiga and al in 1996 studied the support of 36 retrospectively patients who underwent laparoscopic incisional and wash the abscess with a success rate of 100%. Moreover Reich and al in 1987 found 90% success on a review of 25 patients. The transvaginal echo guided puncture to replace the first laparoscopy because of its less invasive nature, this is a simple act, fast, possible under mild sedation, the cost is still lower than laparoscopy. Some uncontrolled retrospective studies suggest that laparoscopy remains associated with prolongation of hospitalization time, it is also mentioned that the transvaginal puncture is better tolerated by the patient. No study has compared these two techniques, which is why we propose this study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
80
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
RECRUITINGClinical cure rate defined by a composite score as defined by O'Brien PC (Procedures for Comparing samples with multiple endpoints Biometrics 1984; 40: 1079-1087.)
Time frame: at 72 hour
Clinical cure rate defined by a composite score as defined by O'Brien PC (Procedures for Comparing samples with multiple endpoints Biometrics 1984; 40: 1079-1087.)
Time frame: at 1 month
Clinical improvement
apyrexia to 72 hours and 1 month and EVA to 72 hours and 1 month
Time frame: at 72 hours and at 1 month
Organic improvement
CRP Standards and GB to 72 hours and 1 month if initially high
Time frame: at 72 hours and at 1 month
Duration of hospital stay
Time frame: at day 0
Analgesia Type: general anesthesia versus sedation
Time frame: at day 1
recurrent complications
Per Statement of complications and postoperative and rehospitalization
Time frame: at day 1
Operating Time
Time frame: at day 1
Fertility prognosis by Mage score
Time frame: at 3 months
prognosis of chronic pelvic pain score by adhesions at second look laparoscopy
Time frame: at 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.