Study E7080-G000-218 is a Randomized, open-label (formerly Double-blind), Phase 2 Trial conducted to assess whether a starting dose of lenvatinib 14 milligrams (mg) in combination with everolimus 5 mg once daily (QD) will provide comparable efficacy (based on objective response rate \[ORR\] at 24 weeks \[ORR24W\]) with an improved safety profile compared to lenvatinib 18 mg in combination with everolimus 5 mg (based on treatment-emergent intolerable Grade 2, or any greater than or equal to (\>=) Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) in the first 24 weeks after randomization).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
343
lenvatinib capsules.
everolimus tablets.
City of Hope National Medical Center
Duarte, California, United States
Innovative Clinical Research Institute, LLC
Whittier, California, United States
Baptist Health Medical Group Oncology, LLC - US Oncology
Miami, Florida, United States
Optimal Research
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
Oklahoma Cancer Specialist and Research Institute , LLC
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Objective Response Rate at Week 24 (ORR24W)
ORR24W was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) at the Week 24 (after randomization) time point, during treatment or within 28 days after the last dose date but on or prior to the start of new anticancer therapy based on investigator assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. CR: defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR: defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. To be considered a BOR, all responses had to be confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the initial assessment of response.
Time frame: At Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Intolerable Grade 2 or Any Grade >=Grade 3 TEAEs Within 24 Weeks
TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) with an onset that had occurred after receiving study drug. A severity grade was defined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. As per NCI-CTCAE, Grade 1 scales as Mild; Grade 2 scales as Moderate; Grade 3 scales as severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; Grade 4 scales as life-threatening consequences; and Grade 5 scales as death related to AE.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD by investigator assessment or date of death, whichever occurred first according to RECIST v1.1. PD: at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter \[mm\]) in the sum of diameter (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Median PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates for each treatment group and presented with 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI). As pre-specified in the protocol, data for this secondary outcome measure was collected and analyzed till the primary analysis only.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or date of death, whichever occurred first or up to date of data cutoff for the primary analysis (up to 29 months)
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR or PR at the at the end of treatment based on investigator assessment according to RECIST v1.1. CR: defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to \<10 mm. PR: defined as at least a 30 % decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. To be considered a BOR, all responses had to be confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the initial assessment of response. As pre-specified in the protocol, data for this secondary outcome measure was collected and analyzed till the primary analysis only.
Time frame: From date of randomization up to first documentation of PD or date of death, whichever occurred first or up to the date of data cut off for the primary analysis (up to 29 months)
Number of Participants With TEAEs and Serious TEAEs
TEAEs were defined as those adverse events (AEs) that occurred (or worsened, if present at Baseline) after the first dose of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of study drug. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participants or clinical investigation participant administered an investigational product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any AE if it resulted in death or life-threatening AE or required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or resulted in persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Time frame: From date of first dose of study drug up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to 71 months)
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Toxicity
Percentage of participants who discontinued treatment due to toxicity, defined as the percentage of participants who discontinued study treatment due to TEAEs. Toxicity (except hypertension and non-infectious pneumonitis) was assessed according to NCI-CTCAE v4.03.
Time frame: From date of first dose of study drug up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to 71 months)
Time to Treatment Failure Due to Toxicity
Time to treatment failure due to toxicity was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date that a participant discontinued study treatment due to TEAEs. Toxicity (except hypertension and non-infectious pneumonitis) was assessed according to CTCAE v4.03. As planned, data for this secondary outcome measure was collected and analyzed till the primary analysis only.
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of discontinuation of study treatment due to TEAEs, or date of data cut off for the primary analysis (up to 29 months)
Plasma Concentration of Lenvatinib
PK sparse sampling was performed. As planned, the post-dose plasma sample was collected anytime between 0.5 to 4 hours at Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15, between 6 to 10 hours at Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15, and between 2 to 12 hours at Cycle 2 Day 1. Only one sample was collected for each post-dose category between specified timepoints.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose and 2-12 hours post-dose (each cycle length =28 days)
Whole Blood Concentration of Everolimus
PK sparse sampling was performed. As planned, the post-dose whole blood sample was collected anytime between 0.5 to 4 hours at Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15, between 6 to 10 hours at Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15, and between 2 to 12 hours at Cycle 2 Day 1. Only one sample was collected for each post-dose category between specified timepoints.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose and 2-12 hours post-dose (each cycle length =28 days)
Model Predicted Apparent Total Clearance (CL/F) for Lenvatinib Alone and When Coadministration With Everolimus in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Participants to Assess Drug-Drug Interaction
Sparse PK samples were collected and analyzed using a population PK approach to estimate PK parameters. The lenvatinib concentration data was pooled from studies E7080 -G000-205 (NCT01136733), E7080-M001-221 (NCT02915783), E7080-J081-112 (NCT02454478) and from current study E7080-G000-218 (NCT03173560). A previously developed 3-compartment PK model for lenvatinib was fitted to the pooled dataset. Individual lenvatinib CL/F value was derived from the final PK model. The outcome measure was assessed for lenvatinib 18 mg dose only.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose and 2-12 hours post-dose (each cycle length =28 days)
Model Predicted Dose Normalized Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) for Lenvatinib Alone and When Coadministration With Everolimus in RCC Participants to Assess Drug-Drug Interaction
Sparse PK samples were collected and analyzed using a population PK approach to estimate PK parameters. The lenvatinib concentration data was pooled from studies E7080 -G000-205 (NCT01136733), E7080-M001-221 (NCT02915783), E7080-J081-112 (NCT02454478) and from current study E7080-G000-218 (NCT03173560). A previously developed 3-compartment PK model for lenvatinib was fitted to the pooled dataset. Individual lenvatinib AUC at steady state based on the starting dose was derived as a function of starting dose from the final PK model. The outcome measure was assessed for lenvatinib 18 mg dose only.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose and 2-12 hours post-dose (each cycle length =28 days)
Model Predicted CL/F for Everolimus Alone and When Coadministration With Lenvatinib in RCC Participants to Assess Drug-Drug Interaction
Sparse PK samples were collected and analyzed using a population PK approach to estimate PK parameters. The everolimus concentration data was pooled from studies E7080-G000-205 (NCT01136733), E7080-M001-221 (NCT02915783), E7080-J081-112 (NCT02454478) or from current study E7080-G000-218 (NCT03173560). A previously developed 3-compartment PK model for everolimus was fitted to the pooled dataset. Individual everolimus CL/F value was derived from the final PK model.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose and 2-12 hours post-dose (each cycle length =28 days)
Model Predicted Dose Normalized AUC for Everolimus Alone and When Coadministration With Lenvatinib in RCC Participants to Assess Drug-Drug Interaction
Sparse PK samples were collected and analyzed using a population PK approach to estimate PK parameters. The everolimus concentration data was pooled from studies E7080-G000-205 (NCT01136733), E7080-M001-221 (NCT02915783), E7080-J081-112 (NCT02454478) or from current study E7080-G000-218 (NCT03173560). A previously developed 3-compartment PK model for everolimus was fitted to the pooled dataset. Individual everolimus AUC at steady state based on the starting dose was derived as a function of starting dose from the final PK model.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose, 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose and 2-12 hours post-dose (each cycle length =28 days)
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, participants will be censored either at the date that the participant was last known to be alive or the date of data cutoff for the primary analysis, whichever comes earlier. Median OS was to be calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimate and presented with 2-sided 95% confidence interval. As pre-specified in the protocol, data for this secondary outcome measure was collected and analyzed till the primary analysis only.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, or up to date of data cut off for the primary analysis (up to 29 months)
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Syndrome Index-Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Scores
The FKSI-DRS consisted of 9 items that experts and participants had indicated are important targets for the treatment of advanced kidney cancer, and that clinical experts had indicated are primarily disease-related, as opposed to treatment-related. Symptoms assessed on the FKSI-DRS included lack of energy, fatigue, weight loss, pain, bone pain, shortness of breath, cough, fever, or hematuria. Each item was scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much) where total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 36 (best), where higher scores correspond to better outcomes. As pre-specified in the protocol, data for this secondary outcome measure was collected and analyzed till the primary analysis only.
Time frame: At baseline (prior to first dose of study drug), on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle (cycle length =28 days), and at the Off-treatment visit (up to 29 months)
HRQoL Assessed by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 Scores
The EORT QLQ-C30 consisted of 30 questions comprising 9 multiple-item scales and 6 single items. Multiple-item scales of QLQ-C30 consisted of 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social) and 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain) and a global health status/QOL score. Six single-item scales of QLQ-C30 involved dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties. First 28 questions used a 4-point scale (1 = Not at all to 4 = Very much); and last 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1 = Very poor to 7 = Excellent). Scores for all scales range from 0 to 100. For the overall HRQoL and functioning scales, a higher score was correlated with better HRQoL, whereas a higher score for symptom scales represented worse HRQoL. As pre-specified in protocol, data for secondary outcome measure was collected and analyzed till primary analysis only.
Time frame: At baseline (prior to first dose of study drug), on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle (cycle length =28 days), and at the Off-treatment visit (up to 29 months)
HRQoL Assessed by European Quality of Life (EuroQol) Five-Dimensional, 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Index Score and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
The EQ-5D-3L is a health profile questionnaire assessing quality of life along 5 dimensions. Participants rate 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) by choosing from 3 answering options (1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3=extreme problems). The summed score ranges from 5-15 with "5" corresponding to no problems and "15" corresponding to severe problems in the 5 dimensions. The EQ-5D index was calculated by applying preference-based weights (tariffs) to the scores of the five health state dimensions. Index values can range from -1 to 1, with 0 representing a health state equivalent to death and 1 representing perfect health. EQ-5D-3L also included an EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) that ranges between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health). Decrease from baseline in EQ-5D-3L signifies improvement. Total index EQ-5D-3L summary score was weighted with a range of -0.594 (worst) to 1.0 (best).
Time frame: At baseline (prior to first dose of study drug), on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle (cycle length =28 days), and at the Off-treatment visit (up to 29 months)
Progression-free Survival After Next Line of Therapy (PFS2)
PFS2, defined as the time from randomization to the date of PD after next line of therapy or death from any cause, whichever occurred first based on investigator assessment according to RECIST v1.1. PD: at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Median PFS2 was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates for each treatment group and presented with 2-sided 95% CI. As pre-specified in protocol, data for this secondary outcome measure was collected and analyzed till the primary analysis only.
Time frame: From the time of randomization to the date of PD after next line of therapy or death from any cause or the date of data cutoff for the primary analysis, whichever occurs first (up to 29 months)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Tennessee Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Texas Oncology PA - US Oncology
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Macquarie University
Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
Northern Cancer Institute, Saint Leonards
Saint Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
...and 83 more locations