In this study, Investigators planned to compare ejaculatory sparing and non-ejaculatory sparing (conventional) TUIP using both subjective and objective assessment tools for the degree of deobstruction. Furthermore, the impact of both techniques on ejaculation and its secondary effect on orgasm perception and different domains of sexual function will be thoroughly assessed.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
40
The bladder neck will be incised and vaporized at the 5 or 7-o'clock position. The incision will start near the ureteral orifice and carry downward to about 0.5-1.0 cm proximal to the verumontanum
the bladder neck will be incised by Collins knife at the 5 or 7-o'clock position till the verumontanum.
Urology and Nephrology Center
Al Mansurah, Aldakahlia, Egypt
RECRUITINGimpact on ejaculatory function and subsequently the impact of reported ejaculatory changes on orgasm perception
Ejaculatory domain of Male sexual health questionnaire (Ej-MSHQ)
Time frame: 1 year
Erectile function domains (erectile function, orgasm, desire, intercourse satisfaction and overall satisfaction)
International index of erectile function-15 (IIEF-15) questionnaire
Time frame: 1 year
Patient reported functional urinary outcomes
International prostate symptom score (IPSS) questionnaire
Time frame: 1 year
maximum flow rate (Q.max)
milliliters per second.
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.