Simulation-based training curricula for gastrointestinal endoscopy have been developed and have been shown to be effective. It is possible that these curricula may be further improved. Gamification, the application of game-design principles to non-game contexts, has been shown to improve learning and skill performance in medical education. In gastrointestinal endoscopy, however, no dedicated curricula have been developed using gamification principles. We aim to evaluate the impact of applying gamification to a curriculum using SBT in endoscopy on clinical performance, compared to an identical curriculum without gamification. 36 novice endoscopists from the general surgery and gastroenterology programs at the University of Toronto will be recruited. Participants will be randomized into two groups: the Conventional Training Curriculum (CTC) Group, in which participants will receive 6 hours of training on a simulator augmented with expert feedback and interlaced with 4 hours of didactic training on the theory of colonoscopy; and the Gamified Integrated Curriculum (GIC) Group, in which participants will receive the same curriculum, using the following applications of gamified learning: a leaderboard of participant performances; badges for achievement of training landmarks; and rewards for top performance. Participants will be trained to perform colonoscopies progressively moving from a low to high complexity simulators, starting with the bench-top model (1 hour) and then moving to the EndoVR® virtual reality (VR) gastroenterology simulator (5 hours). Performance will be assessed at three points: prior to training (pre-test), immediately after training (acquisition post-test) and 4-6 weeks after training (retention test). Assessment will take place on the simulator at all three time points and during two live colonoscopies at the retention test. The primary outcome measure will be the difference in clinical colonoscopy performance between the two training groups, as assessed by the Joint Advisory Group for GI Endoscopy Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (JAG/DOPS). We aim to have data collection finished by 2018. Our results have the potential to improve existing curricula for training in colonoscopy. Moreover, the development of a gamified curriculum in procedural skills may have applicability to other specialities, such as general surgery and anesthesiology.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
40
The experimental group will receive identical training compared to the control group, with the additional incorporation of several elements of gamification, as outlined in the Arm/Group descriptions.
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Performance on a clinical colonoscopy
Difference between the control and intervention groups during two clinical colonoscopies as assessed by two independent, blinded, expert endoscopists using the Joint Advisory Group for GI Endoscopy Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (JAG/DOPS)
Time frame: 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Procedural Knowledge
Differences between the two groups with respect to procedural knowledge as assessed by multiple-choice questionnaires
Time frame: Pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention
Non-technical performance
Differences between the two groups with respect to non-technical performance during clinical colonoscopies and an integrated scenario format test 4-6 weeks after training, as assessed by the modified objective structured assessment of nontechnical skills (M-OSANTS)
Time frame: 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Patient comfort
Differences between the two groups with respect to patient comfort during the clinical colonoscopies, as assessed by the Nurse-Assessed Patient Comfort Score (NAPCOMS)
Time frame: 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Participant self-efficacy
Differences between the two groups with respect to participant self-efficacy, as measured by an adapted scale based on the General Self-Efficacy Scale
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediate post-intervention, and 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Cognitive load
Differences between the two groups with respect to cognitive load, as measured by the Cognitive Load Scale for Colonoscopy
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediate post-intervention, and 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Technical performance
Difference between the two groups with respect to technical performance on a VR simulated colonoscopies as assessed through the JAG/DOPS
Time frame: Immediate post-intervention and 4-6 weeks post-intervention
Participant competitiveness
Difference between the two groups with respect to competitiveness as measured using the Revised Competitiveness Index
Time frame: Pre-intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.