The botulinum toxin was first identified in the late 19th century(1). With its 40 different subtype this toxin is produced mainly by the gram positive anaerobic bacteria Clostridium Botulinum(2). This neurotoxin has great affinity to the neuro muscular junction preventing neurotransmitter release in the synaptic space of acetylcholine(3). The first clinical use was reported by Alan Scott in 1980(4). The most commonly used subtype is toxin A commercially found as BOTOX (onabotulinumtoxinA, Allergan, approved by FDA in 1989), Dysport (abobotulinumtoxinA, Medicis, approved by FDA in 2009) and Xeomin (incobotulinumtoxinA, Merz, approved by FDA in 2010). As for other commercial toxins botulinum neurotoxin serotype B product (MYOBLOC™). Neurotoxin Blast generally 12-15 weeks compared to 3-6 month for neurotoxin A. the FDA approved its use for strabismus in 1989(5), blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm in 1990(6,7), cervical dystonia in 2000(8), glabella in 2000, hyperhidrosis in 2004(9), chronic migrane and detrusor overactiviy in 2014. Other off-label uses have emerged like lanyngeal dysponia, chronic pain etc… (10). Multiple studies with a reduced number of patients have aimed to quantify the effect of botulinum toxin on brow higth. Some studies used injections only to the lateral part of the orbicularis,while others added a corrugator injection. We aimed in this study to compare a known techniques in brow lifting and associanting that with 2 frontalis injection techniques. The main objective is to evaluate the shape of the brow and the elevation in multiple brow landmarks before and after the injection and to see if the frontalis botulinum bloc causes brow ptosis
Botulinum toxin: This toxin has been used clinically since 1989 with label (8) and off-label techniques(3). This is a becoming a routine procedure for men and women with little side effects. Brow lifting The ideal brow position is always an issue in plastic surgery(12). When face ages, the brow descends. Many approaches to a brow elevation are described in the literature. The first surgical approach is through a coronal incision(13), then came the temporal incision(14) and the direct approach(15), and finally the endoscopic approach(16). Non-surgical methods include radiofrequency(17), percutaneous sutures and botulinum toxin(11). Standardized measure Anteroposterior pictures will be taken at rest pre and post injection. Using photoshop 7 brow landmarks will be measured to the midpupillary line.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
30
The purpose of this study is to describe two safe and reproducible techniques upper face botulinum toxin injection. It will also describe the effect of both techniques on the eyebrow shape and height using quantitative, objective measurements and subjective scales
Saint Joseph University
Beirut, Lebanon
Objective assessment
Objective assessment will be done on anteroposterior views of pre-and-post injection photographs. The mid pupillary line will be drawn and the eyebrow vertical height will be measured from this line to the upper border of the brow at seven horizontal points: the most medial aspect of the eyebrow, medial canthus, and medial limbus, mid pupil, lateral limbus, lateral canthus, and most lateral eyebrow.
Time frame: 2 weeks
1-Investigators Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
Improvement in Overall appearance of the upper face, as assessed by the 3 investigators (2 plastic surgeons and 1 dermatologist) using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). GAIS will be completed based on photographic assessment comparing post-treatment photos taken at day 15 post intervention to baseline photos (the lower eyelids and lower face will be cropped), to assess overall aesthetic improvement. The GAIS is a 5-point scale (1-5) as follows: 1. Very Much Improved: optimal cosmetic results 2. Much Improved: marked improvement in appearance from initial condition but not completely optimal 3. Improved: obvious improvement in appearance from initial condition but additional treatments are advised 4. No Change: the appearance is the same as the original condition 5. Wose: the appearance is worse from the original condition
Time frame: 2 weeks
2-Patient satisfaction
Patient satisfaction will be determined by a questionnaire completed at 15 days post-treatment. Subjects will indicate how satisfied they are on a 4-point scale (1-4) as follow: 1. Very Satisfied 2. Satisfied 3. Dissatisfied 4. Very Dissatisfied.
Time frame: 2 weeks
3-Brow Positioning Scale
subjective evaluation using a photonumeric validated scale for eye brow positioning (evaluated by 2 plastic surgeons and 1 dermatologist) using pre and post injection photographs (taken at day 15 and 30) as follow: 0-Youthful, refreshed look and high-arch eyebrow 1. Medium-arch eyebrow 2. Slight arch of the eyebrow 3. Flat arch of the eyebrow, visibility of folds, and tired appearance 4. Flat eyebrow with barely any arch, marked visibility of folds, and very tired appearance
Time frame: 2 weeks
4-Forehead Lines Scale:
subjective evaluation using a photonumeric validated scale for forehead lines at rest (evaluated by 2 plastic surgeons and 1 dermatologist) using pre and post injection photographs (taken at day 15 and 30) as follow: 0-None 1. Minimal 2. Moderate 3. Deep 4. Extreme
Time frame: 2 weeks
5-Glabellar Lines Scale
subjective evaluation using a photonumeric validated scale for glabella lines at rest (evaluated by 2 plastic surgeons and 1 dermatologist) using pre and post injection photographs (taken at day 15) as follow: 0-No glabella lines 1. Mild glabella lines 2. Moderate glabella lines 3. Severe glabella lines 4. Very severe glabella lines
Time frame: 2 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.