To describe the treatment perception from patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) receiving Pradaxa® or VKA for stroke prevention by using the self-estimation questionnaire of PACT-Q during a 6-month study period.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
1,315
Dabigatran etexilate
Chang-Hua Christian Hospital
Changhua, Taiwan
Mean Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire 2 (PACT-Q2) Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Second and Last Assessment Compared to Baseline Assessment
The PACT-Q was a self-administered questionnaire which was developed as a means to investigate patients´ satisfaction with anticoagulant treatment and treatment convenience in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) or atrial fibrillation (AF). The PACT-Q2 was composed of three dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease and treatment (2 items), and anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). Items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed(reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score (CDS). Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction were summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction dimension score (SDS). High scores were more favorable. The two dimension scores were presented for Baseline, Visit 2 (second assessment) and Visit 3 (last assessment) as mean and standard deviation (SD).
Time frame: Baseline, Visit 2 (30-45 days after initiation on Pradaxa®), Visit 3 (150-210 days after initiation on Pradaxa®).
Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Second and Last Assessment Compared Between Treatment Groups
The PACT-Q2 was composed of three dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease and treatment (2 items), and anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). The PACT-Q2 was to be administered to patients once treatment was ongoing. Items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction were summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction dimension score. High scores were more favorable. The two dimension scores were presented for Visit 2 (second assessment) and Visit 3 (last assessment) as mean and standard deviation (SD). Propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to identify matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients. Only the matched patients in each treatment group was summarized and used for comparison.
Time frame: Visit 2 (30-45 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA) and Visit 3 (150-210 days after initiation on Pradaxa® or VKA).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Show Chwan Memorial Hospital
Changhua, Taiwan
Chia-Yi Christian Hospital
Chia-Yi City, Taiwan
Hsinchu MacKay Memorial Hospital
Hsinchu, Taiwan
National Taiwan University Hospital-Hsin-Chu Branch
Hsinchu, Taiwan
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
E-Da Hospital
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
New Taipei City, Taiwan
Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital
New Taipei City, Taiwan
...and 14 more locations
Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Last Assessment Compared to Second Assessment
The PACT-Q2 was composed of three dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease and treatment (2 items), and anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). The PACT-Q2 was to be administered to patients once treatment was ongoing. Items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction were summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction dimension score. High scores were more favorable. The two dimension scores were presented for Visit 2 (second assessment) and Visit 3 (last assessment) as mean and standard deviation (SD).
Time frame: Visit 2 (30-45 days after initiation on Pradaxa®) and Visit 3 (150-210 days after initiation on Pradaxa®).
Description of PACT-Q1 Items for Patients in Cohort B at Baseline
The PACT-Q1 was composed of a single dimension (7 items), covering the expectations of patients regarding their anticoagulant treatment, and was to be administered before treatment initiation. The 7 items were: Q1: How confident are you that your anticoagulant treatment will prevent blood clots? Q2: Do you expect that your anticoagulant treatment will relieve some of the symptoms you experience? Q3: Do you expect that your anticoagulant treatment will cause side effects such as minor bruises or bleeding? Q4: How important is it for you to have an anticoagulant treatment that is easy to take? Q5: How concerned are you about making mistakes when taking your anticoagulant treatment? Q6: How important is it for you to take care of your anticoagulant treatment by yourself? Q7: How concerned are you about how much you pay for your anticoagulant treatment? Responses ranged from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely/Completely/Very much).
Time frame: Baseline