Our study is a non-randomized prospective study compared two groups matched for anterior/apical POP-Q grade: 84 received Elevate Ant™ single-incision mesh (group A) and 42 Perigee™ transvaginal mesh (group B). The study hypothesis was that the Elevate Ant™ mesh would provide better apical correction than the Perigee™ mesh. One- and 2-year follow-up comprised anatomic assessment (POP-Q) and QoL (PFDI-20, PFIQ-7, PISQ-12). Success was defined as 2-year POP-Q ≤1. Secondary endpoints were function and complications.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
126
Surgery with Elevate Ant™
Surgery with Perigee™
comparison of anatomic correction rates in the vaginal apex at 1 year between two mesh kits
Time frame: 1 year post-surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.