A randomized controlled prospective clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of progressive esophageal dilation compared to conservative esophageal dilation in patients with severe benign esophageal strictures.
A randomized controlled prospective clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of progressive esophageal dilation (up to 6mm) compared to esophageal dilation according to the rule-of-3 in patients with severe benign esophageal strictures. Patients will be followed up for 6 months. When recurrent dysphagia occurs within 6 months the patients will be dilated according to the previously allocated strategy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
80
Patients will be dilated with the use of the Savary bougienage device
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
RECRUITINGTotal number of dilation procedures within 6 months of follow-up
Total number of dilation procedures within 6 months of follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
Total number of dilation procedures during first dilation session to 16-18mm
Total number of dilation procedures during first dilation session to 16-18mm
Time frame: 1 month
Dysphagia free patients
Number of patients remaining dysphagia free within 6 months after dilation to 16-18mm
Time frame: 6 months
Timeframe first dilation session
Time from first dilation session to dilation of 16-18mm
Time frame: 1 month
Dysphagia free time period
Time to dilation of recurrent stricture after initial dilation to 16-18mm
Time frame: 6 months
Incidence of treatment-related mortality (serious) adverse events (safety)
Incidence of treatment-related mortality (serious) adverse events (safety)
Time frame: 7 months
Quality of Life
SF-36, disease specific questionnaire
Time frame: 6 months
Medical costs
Direct medicals costs: procedures, secondary interventions
Time frame: 7 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.