The purpose of this study is to compare reduction positon maintenance rate at 3 weeks post-operatively between patients operated with Anterior Support Screw (AS2) and without AS2 technique in RCT setting. Total 240 cases(each arm 120 cases) will be enrolled at maximum 15sites, total study duration is 22months.
Objective: To compare fracture reduction maintenance rate at 2-3weeks post-operatively between patients operated with AS2 (investigational group) and patients operated without AS2 (Control group) using same implant system (ZNN CM Asia, Zimmer Biomet). Endpoint: Primary: The rate of reduction position maintenance at 2-3 weeks post-operatively. Secondary: Surgery time / fracture type / postoperative reduction position / CT assessment / Safety information
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
240
Fractured bone fragments are reduced and stabilized by intramedullary nail.
Reduced bone fragments are to be stabilized by Zimmer Natural Nail CM Asia System.
Experimental group will receive insertion of ACE 4.5/5.0mm cannulated lag-screw anteriorly to Zimmer Natural Nail CM Asia Lag-screw.
Kure Kyosai Hospital
Kure, Hiroshima, Japan
Toyooka Hospital
Toyooka, Hyōgo, Japan
Kasugai Municipal Hospital
Aichi, Kasugai, Japan
Number of Patient With and Without Excessive Lag Screw Sliding Distance
Number of patient was counted based on CT measurement results. Relative position of lag screw between CT images taken at both immediate and 2-3 weeks postoperatively was measured and recorded in value (e.g., 1.5 mm). This was called as "lag screw sliding distance". Four millimeter was set as threshold to define success and failure. Less than 4mm of lag screw sliding distance was recognized as Success and equal to or more than 4mm of lag screw sliding distance was recognized as Failure.
Time frame: Postoperative 2-3 week
Surgery Time
Surgery time from skin incision to closure
Time frame: Intraoperative, an average of 1 hour
Image Assessment Using Computed Tomography (CT)
Number of patient was counted based on CT measurement results. When the fracture reduction position achieved at surgery was maintained at 2 to 3 weeks, then the patient was categorized as success (Reduction position maintained). On the other hand, patient was categorized as failure (Reduction position changed) in the case that the fracture reduction position was changed. Fracture repair position was categorized into three; "Anterior", "Neutral" or "Posterior" based on relative position of proximal bone fragment and distal bone fragment. This analysis only includes patients whose fracture reduction position at immediate postoperative CT was either "Anterior" or "Neutral". If both immediate and 2-3 weeks postoperative CT images show same fracture reduction position (example: "Anterior" at immediate postoperatively \& "Anterior" at 2-3 weeks postoperatively), then the patient was recognized as Success (Reduction position maintained).
Time frame: 2-3 weeks postoperatively
Intraoperative Safety
This is to evaluate whether any adverse events specific to insert additional screw for AS2 technique were occurred.
Time frame: Intraoperative
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Hoshigaoka Medical Center
Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
Numazu City Hospital
Numazu, Shizuoka, Japan
Saiseikai Takaoka Hospital
Takaoka, Toyama, Japan
Kyushu Central Hospital
Fukuoka, Japan
Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital
Kumamoto, Japan
Niigata Central Hospital
Niigata, Japan
Okayama Red Cross Hospital
Okayama, Japan
...and 2 more locations