The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of daratumumab plus cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CyBorD) compared with CyBorD alone in treatment of newly diagnosed amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis participants.
Participant involved in study for approx. 8 years duration includes Screening Phase (complete clinical evaluation will be done), Treatment Phase (monitoring of adverse events (AEs), laboratory abnormalities and clinical response), Post-Treatment Observation Phase (disease evaluations will be done) and a Long-term Follow-up Phase (Subsequent anticancer treatment, response to subsequent treatment, date of progression and survival status will be obtained every 16 weeks).The primary hypothesis is that daratumumab in combination with CyBorD will improve the overall complete hematological response rate compared to CyBorD alone in AL amyloidosis participants. Safety will be assessed by AEs, laboratory test results, electrocardiogram, vital sign measurements, physical examination, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
416
Participants will receive 300 mg/m\^2 of cyclophosphamide as an oral or IV dose.
Participants will receive 1.3 mg/m\^2 of bortezomib as an subcutaneous (SC) injection.
Participants of CyBorD alone arm will receive 40 mg dexamethasone orally or IV dose. Participants of CyBorD plus daratumumab arm will receive dexamethasone 20 mg orally or IV dose as premedication and 20 mg on the day after daratumumab dosing to make a total of 40 mg.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Complete Hematologic Response (CHR)
Overall CHR rate was defined as percentage of participants who achieved CHR, according to the International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria. CHR: normalization of free light chain levels and ratio, negative serum, and urine immunofixation. If involved free light chain (iFLC) is less than (\<) upper limit of normal (ULN) and serum and urine Immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) are negative, then neither a normal uninvolved free light chain (uFLC) level nor a normal free light chain (FLC) ratio are required for complete response (CR).
Time frame: Up to 2.4 years
Major Organ Deterioration Progression-Free Survival (MOD-PFS)
MOD-PFS was defined as duration from the date of randomization to either hematologic progression, or major organ deterioration (clinical manifestation of cardiac failure or renal failure), or death, whichever occurred first. Per international amyloidosis consensus criteria (IACC), hematologic progression was defined as satisfying any one of the following criteria: 1) From CHR, abnormal free light chain ratio (light chain must be double and \>ULN); 2) From CHR/VGPR/PR, 50 percent (%) increase in serum M-protein to \>0.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL) or 50% increase in urine M-protein to 200 milligrams (mg)/day; 3) free light chain increase of 50% to 100 milligrams (mg)/Liter (L).
Time frame: From date of first randomization (Day -3) upto 6.5 years
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival (OS) was measured from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death.
Time frame: From date of first randomization (Day -3) up to 7.1 years
Organ Response Rate (OrRR) at 6 Months: Cardiac Response
The Organ Response Rate (OrRR) for heart was defined as the percentage of participants with baseline involvement of the heart who achieved a confirmed organ response in the heart. Cardiac response was defined as as a decrease of \>30% in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and greater than (\>)300 nanogram/Litre (ng/L).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Participants will receive 1800 mg of daratumumab subcutaneously.
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
City of Hope
Duarte, California, United States
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Stanford University
Stanford, California, United States
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Colorado Blood Cancer Institute
Denver, Colorado, United States
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Winship Cancer Institute Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
...and 130 more locations
Time frame: Month 6
Organ Response Rate (OrRR) at 6 Months: Renal Response
The OrRR for kidney was defined as the percentage of participants with baseline involvement of the kidney who achieved a confirmed renal response in the kidney. Renal response was defined as more than equal to (≥) 30% decrease in proteinuria or proteinuria decreased to \<0.5 grams (g)/24 hours in the absence of renal progression.
Time frame: Month 6
Organ Response Rate (OrRR) at 6 Months: Liver Response
The OrRR for liver was defined as the percentage of participants with baseline involvement of the liver who achieved a confirmed liver response in the liver. Liver response was defined as 50% decrease in abnormal alkaline phosphatase value.
Time frame: Month 6
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Hematologic Response (CHR) at 6 Months
CHR rate was defined as percentage of participants who achieved CHR, according to the International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria. CHR: normalization of free light chain levels and ratio, negative serum, and urine immunofixation. If involved free light chain is \< ULN and serum and urine IFE are negative, then neither a normal uninvolved free light chain (uFLC) level nor a normal free light chain (FLC) ratio are required for Complete Response (CR).
Time frame: Month 6
Time to Complete Hematologic Response (CHR)
Time to CHR was defined as time between the date of randomization and first efficacy evaluation at which the participant has met all criteria for hematologic CR. CHR was primarily defined by negative immunofixation results and normalized free light chain (FLC) parameters.
Time frame: From date of first randomization (Day -3) up to 6.5 years
Time to Cardiac Response
Time to cardiac response was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the first efficacy evaluation at which the participant had cardiac response.
Time frame: From date of first randomization (Day -3) up to 6.5 years
Time to Liver Response
Time to liver response was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the first efficacy evaluation at which the participant had liver response.
Time frame: From date of first randomization (Day -3) up to 6.5 years
Time to Renal Response
Time to renal response was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the first efficacy evaluation at which the participant had renal response.
Time frame: From date of first randomization (Day -3) up to 6.5 years
Time to Subsequent Non-cross Resistant Anti-plasma Cell Therapy
Time to subsequent non-cross resistant anti-plasma cell therapy was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the start date of subsequent non-cross resistant, anti-plasma cell therapy.
Time frame: From date of first randomization (Day -3) up to 6.5 years
Duration of Complete Hematologic Response (CHR)
Duration of CHR was defined as the time between the date of initial documentation of CHR to the date of first documented evidence of hematologic progressive diseased. CHR was primarily defined by negative immunofixation results and normalized FLC parameters.
Time frame: From date of first randomization (Day -3) up to 6.5 years
Hematologic Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better Rate
Hematologic VGPR or Better Rate was defined as percentage of participants who achieved hematologic Complete response (CR) or VGPR. VGPR was defined as the difference between involved iFLC and uFLC after treatment for baseline difference between iFLC and uFLC (dFLC) \>50 milligrams per liter (mg/L): Reduction in the dFLC \<40 mg/L. For Baseline dFLC \< 50 mg/L: more than (\>) 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein \<100 mg/24 hours. CR was negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and \< 5% PCs in bone marrow.
Time frame: From date of first randomization (Day -3) up to 6.5 years
Change From Baseline in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 a 30-question tool was used to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients. It included 30 items resulting in 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), 1 Global health status (GHS) scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The questionnaire includes 28 items with 4-point Likert type responses from "1-not at all" to "4-very much" to assess functioning and symptoms; 2 items with 7-point Likert scales (1= poor and 7= excellent) for global health and overall QoL. Scores were transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores representing better GHS, better functioning, and more symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -28), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92 and 96
Change From Baseline in the Short Form Health Survey, Version 2, the Mental Component Summary, (SF-36v2 MCS)
The SF-36 Health Survey was a generic measure of health status. The SF-36 consisted of 36 questions that yield an eight-scale (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health) profile of functional health and well-being, as well as 2 physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The physical component summary (PCS), the mental component summary (MCS), and the 8 domain scores range from zero (0) to 100, with higher scores representing higher level of functioning.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -28), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92 and 96
Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status Score
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 a 30-question tool was used to assess the overall QoL in cancer patients. It included 30 items resulting in 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), 1 GHS scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The questionnaire includes 28 items with 4-point Likert type responses from "1-not at all" to "4-very much" to assess functioning and symptoms; 2 items with 7-point Likert scales (1= poor and 7= excellent) for global health and overall QoL. Scores were transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores representing better GHS, better functioning, and more symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -28), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92 and 96