Peripheral Arterial disease is a common condition which causes narrowing of the arteries. The most common symptom that patients with PAD experience is Intermittent Claudication (IC), pain in the lower limb(s) on exertion, which is relieved by rest. IC reduces patients' quality of life (QoL) by limiting their ability to walk and engage in daily activities. Regular exercise and physical activity (PA) are central to the management of PAD and help to improve walking distances and reduce the risks associated with PAD such as heart attack and stroke. However, exercise and PA in this population is often limited due to pain. Investigators have shown that Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) can help to reduce pain and increase walking distance in patients with PAD. Investigators have also shown that educating patients about their condition and helping them to set goals has the potential to increase PA, and quality of life. This study will examine the feasibility of designing a definitive trial that investigates whether TENS can improve the physical activity of patients with PAD when delivered alone and/or alongside a patient education programme.
Peripheral Arterial disease (PAD) affects 2.7 million people in the United Kingdom (UK). The most common symptom that patients experience is Intermittent Claudication (IC), which is pain in the buttock, calf or thigh precipitated by exercise and relieved by rest. The underlying cause of PAD is atherosclerosis, which leads to arterial stenosis, inadequate blood flow and build-up of lactic acid during exercise. Patients with IC have impaired quality of life due to reduced physical capacity. Furthermore, due to the diffuse nature of atherosclerosis and the involvement of other arterial beds, they have 3-4 times increased mortality compared to age and sex matched controls. Patients with symptomatic PAD should receive the same secondary prevention management as patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. Improving daily physical activity (PA) is particularly important in individuals with IC as lower PA levels have been recognised as a strong predictor of increased morbidity and mortality in this population. Current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend the use of supervised exercise programmes (SEPs), encouraging patients "to exercise to the point of maximal pain", as first line treatment. SEPs has been shown to be cost-effective when compared to other treatment options such as endovascular intervention and surgical revascularisation. However, while systematic reviews show that SEPs lead to a significant improvement in the absolute walking distances of patients with IC on a treadmill, it is unclear if this is sustained or leads to improvement in daily PA. Furthermore, due to the considerable extra resources required to deliver the recommended 3 months exercise programme (30-45 minutes 3x weekly), SEPs are not always routinely available to National Health Service (NHS) patients, and time and travel costs tend to lead to low patient uptake and high attrition rates. Therefore, investigating the feasibility of using low-cost, patient-centred interventions that can support increased PA is warranted. Lack of self-efficacy, attributed to poor understanding of the disease and uncertainty regarding the importance of exercise, has been shown to be a major barrier to exercise uptake in this population. Educating patients with IC about their disease pathology and the benefits of walking is key to enhancing success of secondary prevention strategies for people with IC. Investigators recently piloted a structured, patient-centred education intervention (SEDRIC) with the specific aim of educating patients with IC about their condition, improving patient ownership, and promoting self-managed walking. In addition to improved treadmill walking distances, investigators found out that there was a trend for patients to increase their daily PA. For patients with IC to gain benefits of secondary prevention, exercising beyond the point when pain occurs is recommended, representing another barrier to engagement in PA. Despite this, investigators' systematic review found that pain management as a route to facilitate exercise and PA has rarely been explored. Recent interest has focused on the use of TENS (a low-cost, non-invasive pain management device) to improve angiogenesis, muscle function, pain and walking distances in patients with IC. TENS has a strong placebo effect in pain conditions, and testing effectiveness against placebo is advocated. In a proof-of-concept pilot study, Investigators demonstrated that TENS could significantly improve pain and increase treadmill walking distances above placebo levels. Our exploratory study also established that home use of TENS was both acceptable and provided self-reported improvement in PA in individuals with IC. Although patient-centred education (SEDRIC) and TENS have both demonstrated potential to improve daily PA in people with IC, the use of these components in combination has not previously been evaluated. Investigators therefore propose a 2 x 2 (TENS versus placebo TENS x SEDRIC versus no additional education) feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) that will compare use of TENS against placebo TENS with and without a patient-centred education programme. Investigators have conducted a series of pilot studies underpinning both aspects of the intervention. Investigators have demonstrated in an experimental lower limb ischaemic pain model in healthy volunteers (n=28) that TENS significantly reduced onset of pain (by 29 seconds; 23%), tolerance of pain (by 203 seconds; 53%) and the pain endurance (by 173 seconds; 67%), compared to placebo TENS. Following this, in a proof-of-concept pilot study, investigators demonstrated that TENS when applied to patient with IC exercising on a treadmill (n=40) significantly improved absolute claudication distance (ACD) above placebo levels (approx. mean individual increase in ACD of 40%, p=.025, r= .53). Our phase 2 study also established that home use of TENS was both acceptable and provided self-reported improvement in PA in individuals with IC. Investigators have not assessed the ability of TENS to improve ACD when used during daily life. Similarly, this research group developed and piloted SEDRIC, a structured, patient-centred education intervention with the specific aim of educating patients about their condition, improving patient ownership, and promoting self-managed walking. Investigators found that in patients with PAD (n=14), treadmill walking distances (30%) and quality of life (32%) improved from baseline after 6 weeks of structured education, and there was a trend for patients to increase their daily PA (approx. 8% change from baseline). The aim is to determine the feasibility of electrical stimulation via a low-cost CE-marked device used within a patient centred education programme to improve walking distances in patients with PAD. The following research questions will be answered by this project: 1. What is the feasibility (i.e. recruitment and retention rates, adherence, safety, sample size for a definitive trial, potential for effectiveness) of conducting a definitive RCT comparing TENS with and without patient-centred education? 2. How acceptable are TENS and patient-centred education as interventions on their own or in combination in patients with IC?
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
95
TENS is a form of electrical stimulation that provides symptomatic pain relief that is used extensively within the health-care setting. It is a non-invasive modality; packaged in a small, portable unit that is easy to apply via small electrodes placed on the skin.
Group education for patients with peripheral arterial disease and intermittent claudication about their condition, improving patient ownership, and promoting self-managed walking
TENS device use with setting so that the stimulation delivered is ineffective
Clinical Research Facility, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital
Glasgow, Strathcylde, United Kingdom
Change in Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD) in Meters From Baseline
Maximal walking distance on graded treadmill test
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
Recruitment Rates
Measure recruitment rates (ratio of patients who consent to participate to potentially eligible patient recorded via the study screening log
Time frame: Recruitment
Participant Retention Rate
Ratio of patients who completed the intervention and outcome assessment to the patient who consented
Time frame: End of study (18 weeks)
Adverse Events
Record defined adverse events in all groups
Time frame: End of study (18 weeks)
Uptake of Interventions
Measure uptake of intervention via log of TENS use and attendance at education session and follow up phone calls
Time frame: End of study (18 weeks)
Change in Initial Claudication Distance (ICD) in Meters From Baseline
Onset distance of claudication pain on graded treadmill test
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
Change in Daily Number of Steps
Change in daily number of steps (activpal step counts)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
Change in Total Number of Upright Events Per Day
Total number of upright events per day (activpal upright even count)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
Change in Total Number of Walking Events Per Day
Total number of walking events per day (activpal walking event counts)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
Change in Event-based Claudication Index
Event-based claudication index (ratio of walking events to upright events) participants undertake in a day.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ)
Disease specific quality of life questionnaire. ICQ scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores representing better health status and less impact of claudication
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
Short-Form 36 Questionnaire- Physical Component
Generic quality of life questionnaire, physical domain. The SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) ranges from 0-100, with higher scores representing better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain Rating Index (PRI)
Pain quality questionnaire. The MPQ-PRI ranges from 0-78, with lower scores representing less pain and higher scores representing worse pain.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Average Pain intensity in the past 7 days. The average pain intensity VAS ranges from 0-100 mm, with lower scores indicating less pain and better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ)
The Brief IPQ uses 0-10 scales. Higher scores indicate worse perceptions (greater perceived consequences, concern, emotional impact, chronicity).
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
Geriatric Depression Scale (Short Form) (GDS-SF)
Depression questionnaire. The GDS-SF ranges 0-15, with higher scores reflecting more depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)
The PSEQ total score ranges from 0-60, with higher scores indicating better pain self-efficacy and more positive outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (post-intervention), 18 weeks (follow-up)
SF-36 Mental Component Score
SF-36 Quality of life scale - mental component. The SF-36 MCS ranges 0-100 (or norm-based mean 50, SD 10), with higher scores representing better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention and follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.