A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the LentiGlobin® BB305 Drug Product in Participants With Transfusion-Dependent β-Thalassemia

Phase 3CompletedNCT03207009

Genetix Biotherapeutics Inc.19 enrolled

Overview

This is a single-arm, multi-site, single-dose, Phase 3 study in approximately 18 participants less than or equal to (\<=) 50 years of age with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT), who have a β0/β0, β0/IVS-I-110, or IVS-I-110/IVS-I-110 genotype. The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

Conditions

Beta-Thalassemia

Interventions

LentiGlobin BB305 Drug ProductGENETIC

LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product is administered by IV infusion following myeloablative conditioning with busulfan.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 0 YearsMax age: 50 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: • Participants less than or equal to (\<=) 50 years of age at the time of consent or assent (as applicable), and able to provide written consent (adults, or legal guardians, as applicable) or assent (adolescents or children). Provided that the data monitoring committee (DMC) has approved enrolling participants younger than 5 years of age, participants younger than 5 years of age may be enrolled if they weigh a minimum of 6 kilograms (kg) and are reasonably anticipated to be able to provide at least the minimum number of cells required to initiate the manufacturing process. * Diagnosis of TDT with a history of at least 100 milliliter per kilogram per year (mL/kg/year) of pRBCs in the 2 years preceding enrollment (all participants), or be managed under standard thalassemia guidelines with \>= 8 transfusions of pRBCs per year in the 2 years preceding enrollment (participants \>=12 years). * Clinically stable and eligible to undergo HSCT. * Treated and followed for at least the past 2 years in a specialized center that maintained detailed medical records, including transfusion history. Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of a mutation characterized as other then β0 (e.g., β+, βE, βC) on at least one β-globin gene (HBB) allele. * Positive for presence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 or 2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2), hepatitis B virus (HBV), or hepatitis C (HCV). * A white blood cell (WBC) count less than (\<) 3×10\^9/liter (L), and/or platelet count \<100×10\^9/L not related to hypersplenism. * Uncorrected bleeding disorder. * Any prior or current malignancy. * Prior HSCT. * Advanced liver disease. * A cardiac T2\* \<10 ms by MRI. * Any other evidence of severe iron overload that, in the investigator's opinion, warrants exclusion. * Participation in another clinical study with an investigational drug within 30 days of Screening. * Any other condition that would render the participant ineligible for HSCT, as determined by the attending transplant physician or investigator. * Prior receipt of gene therapy. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding in a postpartum female or absence of adequate contraception for fertile participant. * A known and available human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched family donor. * Any contraindications to the use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor during the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells and any contraindications to the use of busulfan and any other medicinal products required during the myeloablative conditioning, including hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the excipients.

Locations (9)

UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland

Oakland, California, United States

Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Hopital d'enfants de la Timone

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percentage of Participants Who Have Achieved Transfusion Independence (TI)

TI was defined as a weighted average hemoglobin (Hb) \>= 9 grams per deciliter (g/dL) without any packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions for a continuous period of \>= 12 months at any time during the study after drug product infusion.

Time frame: From 12 to 24 months post-transplant

Secondary Outcomes

Percentage of Participants Who Have Achieved Transfusion Independence (TI) at Month 24

Time frame: At Month 24 post-transplant

Duration of Transfusion Independence (TI)

Duration of TI was calculated as the time from the start of TI (i.e. first Hb \>=9 with no transfusions in the preceding 60 days) up to the last available Hb at which the TI criteria are still met using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Time frame: From start of TI up to Month 24 (actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 25 months due to visit window)

Time From Drug Product Infusion to Achievement of Transfusion Independence (TI)

Time from drug product infusion to achievement of TI was calculated as the time from drug product infusion to the first hemoglobin at which a participant can be declared as TI (that is to 'start of TI + \>= 12 months', dependent on Hb lab schedule).

Time frame: From drug product infusion to start of TI (up to Month 24 [actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 25 months due to visit window])

Weighted Average Hemoglobin (Hb) During Transfusion Independence (TI)

Weighted average Hb was defined as the weighted average of Hb values without any pRBC transfusions in the proceeding 60 days for a given subject. Ratio of the time between two Hb values and the time between the first and the last Hb values was used as the weight for calculation.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

Hannover Medical School

Hanover, Germany

University of Heidelberg

Heidelberg, Germany

General Hospital of Thessaloniki 'G.Papanikolaou'

Thessaloniki, Greece

IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Babino Gesu

Rome, Italy

University College London Hospital

London, United Kingdom

Time frame: Timeframe varied by subject. For a given subject, the endpoint was calculated from 60 days after the last pRBC transfusion (so transfused blood did not confound the weighted average calculation) through the Month 24 Visit for that subject.

Percentage of Participants Who Meet the Definition of Transfusion Reduction (TR)

TR was defined as demonstration of a 60 percent (%) reduction in the annualized volume of pRBC transfusion requirements (in milliliter per kilogram \[mL/kg\]) in the post-treatment time period from 12 Months post-drug product infusion through Month 24 compared to the annualized mL/kg pRBC transfusion requirement during the 24 months prior to study enrollment.

Time frame: From 12 to 24 months post-transplant

Percentage of Participants Who Had a Reduction of At Least 50%, 60%, 75%, 90% or 100% in the Annualized pRBCs Transfusion Volume

Percentage of participants with a reduction in the annualized mL/kg pRBCs transfused from 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24 (approximately a 12-month period) of at least 50%, 60%, 75%, 90% or 100% compared to the annualized mL/kg pRBC transfusion requirement during the 24 months prior to enrollment.

Time frame: 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24

Annualized Number of pRBC Transfusions

Annualized number of pRBC transfusions from 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24 was reported.

Time frame: From 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24

Annualized Volume of pRBC Transfusions

Annualized volume of pRBC transfusions from 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24 compared to the annualized volume of transfusions during the 24 months prior to enrollment.

Time frame: From 12 to 24 months post-transplant

Time From Drug Product Infusion to Last pRBC Transfusion

Time from drug product infusion to last pRBC transfusion was reported.

Time frame: From start of drug product infusion up to Month 24

Time From Last pRBC Transfusion to 24 Months

Time From Last pRBC Transfusion to the Month 24 was reported.

Time frame: From last pRBC Transfusion up to Month 24 (actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 27 months due to visit window)

Weighted Average Nadir Hemoglobin (Hb)

The weighted average nadir Hb was defined as the most recent Hb prior to each pRBC transfusion, on the day of transfusion or within 3 days and, if there was a period of more than 60 days without transfusion, all Hb records between Day 61 and last follow-up or next transfusion (inclusive) was included. The weighted average nadir Hb during the period of 12 months post-drug product infusion to Month 24 was compared to the weighted average nadir Hb during the 24 months prior to enrollment.

Time frame: 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24

Unsupported Total Hb Levels at Month 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

Unsupported total Hb level was defined as the total Hb measurement level without any acute or chronic pRBC transfusions within 60 days prior to the measurement date.

Time frame: At Month 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

Number of Participants With Unsupported Total Hb Levels (>=10 g/dL, >=11 g/dL, >=12 g/dL, >=13 g/dL, and >=14 g/dL) at Months 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

Number of participants with unsupported total Hb levels (\>=10 g/dL, \>=11 g/dL, \>=12 g/dL, \>=13 g/dL, and \>=14 g/dL) meeting the thresholds were reported at Months 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24. Participants were evaluable if they had an unsupported total Hb measurement at the specific timepoint, where unsupported total Hb level is defined as the total Hb measurement level without any acute or chronic pRBC transfusions within 60 days prior to the measurement date.

Time frame: At Months 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24

Percentage of Participants Who Have Not Received Chelation Therapy for At Least 6 Months Following Drug Product Infusion

Percentage of participants who have not received chelation therapy for at least 6 months following drug product infusion were reported.

Time frame: From 6 to 24 months

Time From Last Iron Chelation Use to Last Follow-up

Time from last iron chelation use to last follow-up to 24 months was reported.

Time frame: From last Iron Chelation up to Month 24 (actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 29 months due to visit window)

Number of Participants Who Used Therapeutic Phlebotomy Post Drug Product Infusion

Therapeutic phlebotomy could be used in lieu of chelation in participants who had Hb consistently \>= 11 g/dL and who were no longer receiving regular transfusions, at the discretion of the investigator. Number of participants who used therapeutic phlebotomy post Drug Product infusion for up to Month 24 were reported.

Time frame: From drug product infusion through Month 24

Annualized Phlebotomy Therapy Usage Following Drug Product Infusion

Annualized phlebotomy therapy usage (number of procedures per year, calculated from DP infusion through last follow-up) were reported.

Time frame: From drug product infusion through Month 24

Change From Baseline in Liver Iron Content by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Change From Baseline in Liver Iron Content by MRI at Months 12 and 24 were reported. Baseline is defined as value closest to but prior to conditioning.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and 24

Change From Baseline in Cardiac T2* on MRI

Change From Baseline in Cardiac T2\* on MRI from Baseline, Month 12 and 24 was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin

Serum ferritin was commonly used for an indirect estimation of body iron stores. Although sensitive, it is not specific for iron overload as it can be elevated in a variety of infectious and inflammatory states, and in the presence of cytolysis. Change from baseline in serum ferritin at Months 12 and 24 was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and 24

Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Total Scores at Months 12 and 24

PedsQL GCS designed to measure health-related quality of life in pediatric and adolescents (2-18 years). It encompassed 4 dimensions of functioning (physical \[8 items\], emotional \[5 items\], social \[5 items\], school \[3 items\]). Age groups: Toddler (2-4 years), Young pediatric (5-7 years), Pediatric (8-12 years), Teens (13-18 years). The questionnaire was also completed by parent/caregiver to assess parents' perceptions of their children's quality of life. The Toddler group consisted of 21 items, using a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4); all other groups consisted of 23 items, with a 3-point Likert scale (0, 2, 4) for young pediatric, a 5-point Likert scale for pediatric and teens groups. All reported scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 for each domain where 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Higher scores correspond with higher quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and 24

Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Health Status at Months 12 and 24

EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that was most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. EQ-5D-Y was a version of instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. The EQ-5D-Y visual analog scale (VAS) consisted of a 20-cm vertical VAS, with anchors of 0 (worst imaginable health state) and 100 (best imaginable health state). Respondents were asked to rate their own health state today by drawing a line from a box containing these words to the point on the scale that they felt most accurately reflected their current health state. The VAS was reported (raw data) on a scale of 0-100 where 0= death and 100= perfect health. Higher scores corresponded with higher quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Adult Scale (EQ-5D-3L) VAS Heath Status Score at Months 12 and 24

EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that was most widely used preference based health related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. Participants age \>=18 at time of informed consent were eligible to complete the EQ-5D-3L visual analog scale (VAS) which consisted of a 20-cm vertical VAS, with anchors of 0 (worst imaginable health state) and 100 (best imaginable health state). Respondents were asked to rate their own health state today by drawing a line from a box containing these words to the point on the scale that they felt most accurately reflected their current health state. The VAS was reported (raw data) on a scale of 0-100 where 0= death and 100= perfect health. Negative change in score indicated decrease in quality of life (as measured by EQ5D VAS) from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) Questionnaire Total Score

FACT-BMT is assessed bone marrow transplant related quality of life in adults. Total score was sum of sub-scale scores for 5 domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, and Bone Marrow Transplantation Subscale. Each item scored on a 5-point Likert scale based on participant agreement with each statement: 0 for "not at all," 1 for "a little bit," 2 for "somewhat," 3 for "quite a bit," and 4 for "very much. Reported scores were transformed as follows: After taking into account reverse scores for questions constructed in negative form, subscale score for each domain was calculated by multiplying sum of item scores by number of items in subscale, then dividing by number of items answered. Total score was sum of subscale total added together and ranges from 0-148. Higher scores corresponded with higher quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24

Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2, Acute (Physical and Mental Component Summary Scores) at Months 12 and 24

SF-36 was designed to measure health-related quality of life in adults. The instrument consisted of 36 items that were aggregated into 8 multi-item scales (physical functioning \[1=yes, limited a lot, to 3=no, not limited at all\], role-physical \[1=all of time, to 5=none of time\], bodily pain \[1=very severe, to 6=none\], general health \[1=poor, to 5=excellent\], vitality \[1=none of time, to 5=all of time\], social functioning \[1=all of time, to 5=none of time\], role emotional \[1=all of time, to 5=none of time\] and mental health \[1=all of time, to 5=none of the time\]). The 8 scales were summarized as Physical Component Summary (PCS) score (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health scales) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) score (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health scales). Reported summary scores were transformed on a scale from 0-100 (higher scores corresponded with higher quality of life), with change from baseline results being presented.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24