The purpose of this phase 2 study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NIR178 in combination with PDR001 in multiple solid tumors and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and further explore schedule variations of NIR178 to optimize immune activation through inhibition of A2aR.
This is an open-label multi-part, phase II study evaluating the combination of NIR178 and PDR001 in patients with advanced solid tumors and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The study has three parts: * Part 1: Multi-arm Bayesian adaptive signal finding design in solid tumors and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with continuous dosing of NIR178 in combination with PDR001. * Part 2: Exploration of continuous and intermittent NIR178 schedules in combination with PDR001 in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). * Part 3: Further evaluation of optimal intermittent or continuous schedule of NIR178 in combination with PDR001 (if selected based on results of Part 2). As of protocol amendment 6, Part 3 explored the safety and pharmacokinetics of the film-coated tablet (FCT) formulation of NIR178 continuous dosing in combination with PDR001 in tiple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. In addition, a separate safety run-in part was conducted in Japan in order to adequately characterize the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of NIR178 as a single-agent and in combination with PDR001. Patients enrolled in this study received NIR178 either twice daily (BID) continuously or based on the assigned intermittent schedule within 60 minutes prior to PDR001 infusion. PDR001 400 mg was administered via IV infusion over 30 minutes once every 4 weeks. Each treatment cycle was 28 days. Patients enrolled in the Japanese safety run-in part received NIR178 as single agent for the first cycle (28 days). If the patients completed Cycle 1 without experiencing dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), they initiated combination therapy with PDR001 starting Cycle 2 onwards, and continued at the same dose of NIR178. An additional cohort in the Japanese safety run-in part of the study received NIR178 in combination with PDR001 starting with Cycle 1. If the patients complete Cycle 1 without experiencing DLTs, they continued to receive combination treatment. Patients received treatment with the combination until disease progression (assessed by investigator per immune-related response criteria (iRECIST) or Cheson 2014), unacceptable toxicity, death or discontinuation from study treatment for any other reason (e.g., withdrawal of consent, start of a new anti-neoplastic therapy or at the discretion of the investigator), otherwise known as End of Treatment.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
315
NIR178, a new, non-xanthine based compound, is a potent oral adenosine A2a receptor against antagonist being developed by Novartis. NIR178 was administered orally twice daily (BID) as a capsule (Part 1, Part 2 and Japanese safety run-in) and as a film-coated table (Part 3). There were up to 3 dose levels assessed: 80, 160 and 240 mg. Three alternative dosing schedules were evaluated: continuous (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Japanese safety run-in), 2 weeks on/2 weeks off (Part 2) and 1 week on/1 week off (Part 2). Each cycle consisted of 28 days.
PDR001 is a human monoclonal antibody (MAb) administered on Day 1 of each cycle. PDR001 400 mg was administered via intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 30 minutes every 4 weeks (Q4W).
University of California, Los Angeles
Santa Monica, California, United States
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute .
Tampa, Florida, United States
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center/University of Texas
Houston, Texas, United States
The University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Salzburg, Austria
Novartis Investigative Site
Liège, Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Brno, Czech Republic, Czechia
...and 11 more locations
Part 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors
ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: Up to 3.9 years
Part 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL
ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 criteria for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). For Cheson 2014 criteria, CR= Target nodes/nodal masses must regress to ≤1.5 cm in longest diameter (LDi), no extralymphatic sites of disease, absent non-measured lesions, organ enlargement regress to normal, no new lesions, and bone marrow normal by morphology (if indeterminate, immunohistochemistry negative); PR= ≥50% decrease in the sum of the product of the perpendicular diameters (SPD) of up to 6 target measurable nodes, absent or regressed non-measured lesions, spleen must have regressed by \>50% in length beyond normal, and no new lesions.
Time frame: Up to 2.5 years
Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors
ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: Up to 4.7 years
Part 3: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors
ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: Up to 0.5 years
Part 1: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors
ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).
Time frame: Up to 3.9 years
Part 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors
ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).
Time frame: Up to 4.7 years
Part 3: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors
ORR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).
Time frame: Up to 0.5 years
Part 1: Mean Percentage Change in PSA From Baseline
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were assessed in serum. Rising PSA is generally a manifestation of progression of prostate cancer.
Time frame: Baseline, up to 0.8 years
Part 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors
DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or Non-CR or Non-progressive disease (NCRNPD), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.
Time frame: Up to 3.9 years
Part 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors
DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR), partial response (iPR), stable disease (iSD) or Non-iCR or Non-unconfirmed progressive disease (NON-iCR or NON-iUPD), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).
Time frame: Up to 3.9 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Part 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL
DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD), based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 criteria for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
Time frame: Up to 2.5 years
Part 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors
DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or Non-CR or Non-progressive disease (NCRNPD), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.
Time frame: Up to 4.7 years
Part 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors
DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR), partial response (iPR), stable disease (iSD) or Non-iCR or Non-unconfirmed progressive disease (NON-iCR or NON-iUPD), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).
Time frame: Up to 4.7 years
Part 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors
DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or Non-CR or Non-progressive disease (NCRNPD), based on local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.
Time frame: Up to 0.5 years
Part 3: Disease Control Rate (DCR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors
DCR is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (iCR), partial response (iPR), stable disease (iSD) or Non-iCR or Non-unconfirmed progressive disease (NON-iCR or NON-iUPD), based on local investigator assessment per immune-related RECIST (iRECIST).
Time frame: Up to 0.5 years
Part 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors
DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 3.9 years
Part 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors
DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR) based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (iCR or iPR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 3.9 years
Part 1: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL
DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 criteria for DLBCL. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 2.5 years
Part 2: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors
DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 4.7 years
Part 2: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors
DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR) based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (iCR or iPR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 4.7 years
Part 3: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors
DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 0.5 years
Part 3: Duration Of Response (DOR) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors
DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (iCR) or partial response (iPR) based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (iCR or iPR) to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 0.5 years
Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors
PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 3.9 years
Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors
PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 3.9 years
Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL
PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per Cheson 2014 for DLBCL. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 2.5 years
Part 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors
PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 4.7 years
Part 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors
PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 4.7 years
Part 3: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1 for Solid Tumors
PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 0.5 years
Part 3: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per iRECIST for Solid Tumors
PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever happened first. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per iRECIST. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: Up to 0.5 years
Part 1: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)
OS represents the percentage of participants who are alive after the start of study treatment. OS at 2 years was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method as defined in the statistical analysis plan (SAP).
Time frame: 2 years
Part 2: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)
OS represents the percentage of participants who are alive after the start of study treatment. OS at 2 years was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: 2 years
Part 3: 2-year Overall Survival (OS)
OS represents the percentage of participants who are alive after the start of study treatment. OS at 2 years was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method as defined in the statistical analysis plan.
Time frame: 2 years
Part 1: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue
The tumor expression of CD8 was measured by immunohistochemical (IHC) methods. Newly obtained pre- and on-treatment paired tumor samples were required and collected at screening and after approximately two cycles of therapy.
Time frame: Screening and on-treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1 or Day 15). The duration of one cycle was 28 days.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue
The tumor expression of CD8 was measured by immunohistochemical (IHC) methods. Newly obtained pre- and on-treatment paired tumor samples were required and collected at screening and after approximately two cycles of therapy.
Time frame: Screening and on-treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1 or Day 15). The duration of one cycle was 28 days.
Part 3: Change From Baseline in CD8 Percent Marker Area in Tumor Tissue
The tumor expression of CD8 was measured by immunohistochemical (IHC) methods. Newly obtained pre- and on-treatment paired tumor samples were required and collected at screening and after approximately two cycles of therapy.
Time frame: Screening and on-treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1 or Day 15). The duration of one cycle was 28 days.
Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment Period
Number of participants with AEs (any AE regardless of seriousness) and SAEs, including changes from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory results qualifying and reported as AEs. The on-treatment period is defined from the day of first administration of study treatment up to 30 days after the date of its last administration.
Time frame: Up to 4 years (Part 1), 4.8 years (Part 2) and 0.6 years (Part 3)
Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of NIR178
Number of participants with at least one dose reduction of NIR178 and number of participants with at least one dose interruption of NIR178. Dose or schedule adjustments were permitted for patients who did not tolerate the protocol-specified dosing schedule.
Time frame: Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3)
Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of PDR001
Number of participants with at least one dose reduction of PDR001 and number of participants with at least one dose interruption of PDR001. Dose or schedule adjustments were permitted for patients who did not tolerate the protocol-specified dosing schedule. Dose reductions were not permitted for PDR001.
Time frame: Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3)
Part 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of NIR178
Dose intensity of NIR178 was calculated as cumulative actual dose in milligrams divided by duration of exposure in days.
Time frame: Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3)
Part 1, 2 and 3: Dose Intensity of PDR001
Dose intensity of PDR001 was calculated as cumulative actual dose in milligrams divided by duration of exposure in days and then multiplied by 28 days.
Time frame: Up to 3.9 years (Part 1), 4.7 years (Part 2) and 0.5 years (Part 3)
Part 1, 2 and 3: Number of Participants With Anti-PDR001 Antibodies
PDR001 immunogenicity was evaluated in serum samples. Patient anti-drug antibodies (ADA) status was defined as follows: * ADA-negative at baseline: ADA-negative sample at baseline * ADA-positive at baseline: ADA-positive sample at baseline * ADA-negative post-baseline: ADA-negative sample at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline sample, all of which are ADA-negative samples * Treatment-reduced ADA-positive: ADA-positive sample at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline sample, all of which are ADA-negative samples * Treatment-induced ADA-positive: ADA-negative sample at baseline and at least 1 treatment-induced ADA-positive sample * Treatment-boosted ADA-positive: ADA-positive sample at baseline and at least 1 treatment-boosted ADA-positive sample * ADA-inconclusive: patient who does not qualify for any of the above definitions or a patient for which the baseline sample is missing
Time frame: Up to approximately 5 years
Japan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as an adverse event or abnormal laboratory value of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3 assessed as unrelated to disease, disease progression, inter-current illness or concomitant medications, which occurs within the first 28 days of treatment with NIR178 as single agent or in combination with PDR001 during the Japan safety run-in part of the study. Other clinically significant toxicities may be considered to be DLTs, even if not CTCAE grade 3 or higher.
Time frame: 28 days
Japan Safety Run-in: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment Period
Number of participants with AEs (any AE regardless of seriousness) and SAEs, including changes from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory results qualifying and reported as AEs. The on-treatment period is defined from the day of first administration of study treatment up to 30 days after the date of its last administration.
Time frame: Up to 0.7 years
All Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NIR178
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on NIR178 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed plasma concentration following a dose.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days
All Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NIR178
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on NIR178 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) plasma concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days
All Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NIR178
PK parameters were calculated based on NIR178 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-12hr calculation.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days
All Study Parts: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)
NJI765 is a NIR178 metabolite. PK parameters were calculated based on NJI765 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed plasma concentration following a dose.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days
All Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)
NJI765 is a NIR178 metabolite. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on NJI765 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) plasma concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days
All Study Parts: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours Post Dose (AUC0-12hr) of NJI765 (NIR178 Metabolite)
NJI765 is a NIR178 metabolite. PK parameters were calculated based on NJI765 plasma concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-12hr calculation.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (all), Cycle 1 Day 7 (1wk-on/1wk-off), Cycle 1 Day 14 (2wk-on/2wk-off) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (continuous dosing): pre-dose, 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 8 hours after morning dose and 12 hours after evening dose. 1 cycle=28 days
All Study Parts: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of PDR001
PK parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed serum concentration following a dose.
Time frame: First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1 for Japanese patients treated with NIR178 80 or 160 mg) and Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-infusion, 1, 168, 336, 504 and 672 hours after end of infusion. Average duration of infusion=30 minutes. 1 cycle=28 days
All Study Parts: Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of PDR001
PK parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) serum concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations.
Time frame: First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1 for Japanese patients treated with NIR178 80 or 160 mg) and Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-infusion, 1, 168, 336, 504 and 672 hours after end of infusion. Average duration of infusion=30 minutes. 1 cycle=28 days
All Study Parts: Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 28 Days Post Dose (AUC0-28day) of PDR001
PK parameters were calculated based on PDR001 serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUC0-28day calculation.
Time frame: First dose (Cycle 1 Day 1 or Cycle 2 Day 1 for Japanese patients treated with NIR178 80 or 160 mg) and Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-infusion, 1, 168, 336, 504 and 672 hours after end of infusion. Average duration of infusion=30 minutes. 1 cycle=28 days