Primary Objective: To demonstrate non-inferiority of SAR341402 versus NovoLog/NovoRapid in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change from baseline to Week 26 in participants with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM or T2DM) also using Lantus®. Secondary Objectives: * To assess the immunogenicity of SAR341402 and NovoLog/NovoRapid in terms of positive/negative status and anti-insulin antibody (AIA) titers during the course of the study. * To assess the relationship of AIAs with efficacy and safety. * To assess the efficacy of SAR341402 and NovoLog/NovoRapid in terms of proportion of participants reaching HbA1c lesser than (\<) 7.0% and change in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profiles from baseline to Week 26 and Week 52 (only Week 52 for HbA1c). * To assess safety of SAR341402 and NovoLog/NovoRapid.
The study consisted of a 2-week screening period, a 26-week treatment period, a 26-week comparative safety extension period, and a 1-day follow-up period. The maximum study duration was 54 weeks per participant and a 1 day safety follow-up.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
597
SAR341402 100 units per milliliters (U/mL) (dose range of 1 unit to 80 units) self-administered by SC injection, immediately (within 5-10 minutes) before meal intake. Dose adjusted to achieve a 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG \<10 millimoles/liter \[mmol/L\] \[\<180 milligram/deciliter {mg/dL}\]) while avoiding hypoglycemia.
NovoLog/NovoRapid 100 U/mL (dose range of 1 unit to 60 units) self-administered by SC injection, immediately (within 5-10 minutes) before meal intake. Dose adjusted to achieve a 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG \<10 mmol/L \[\<180 mg/dL\]) while avoiding hypoglycemia.
Insulin glargine 100 U/mL injected QD subcutaneously consistent with the local label. Doses adjusted to achieve glycemic target for fasting, preprandial plasma glucose between 4.4 to 7.2 mmol/L (80 to 130 mg/dL) without hypoglycemia.
Investigational Site Number 8400040
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Investigational Site Number 8400012
Concord, California, United States
Investigational Site Number 8400002
Escondido, California, United States
Investigational Site Number 8400030
Fresno, California, United States
Investigational Site Number 8400004
Greenbrae, California, United States
Change in Glycated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 26
All values up to Week 26 were taken into account in the analysis, regardless of adherence to treatment. Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing changes at Week 26 were imputed using a retrieved dropout multiple imputation method (separately for participants who prematurely discontinued or completed treatment). Adjusted least square (LS) means and standard errors (SE) were obtained using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model on data obtained from the multiple imputations (results were combined using Rubin's formulae).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52
All values up to Week 52 were taken into account in the analysis, regardless of adherence to treatment. Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 52 value. Missing changes at Week 52 were imputed using a retrieved dropout multiple imputation method (separately for participants who prematurely discontinued or completed treatment). Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained using ANCOVA model on data obtained from the multiple imputations (results were combined using Rubin's formulae).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7% at Week 26 and Week 52
Participants who had no available assessment at Week 26 and Week 52 were considered as non-responders.
Time frame: Week 26 and Week 52
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52
All values up to Week 26 and Week 52 were taken into account in the analysis, regardless of adherence to treatment. Change in FPG at Week 26 and 52 was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 and Week 52 values, respectively. Missing changes at Week 26 and Week 52 were imputed using a retrieved dropout multiple imputation method (separately for participants who prematurely discontinued or completed treatment). Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained using ANCOVA analysis on data obtained from the multiple imputations (results were combined using Rubin's formulae).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, and Week 52
Change in the Mean 24-hour Plasma Glucose Concentration From Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52
Mean 24-hour plasma glucose concentration was calculated based on 7-point self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profiles with plasma glucose measurements before and 2-hours after each main meal and at bedtime. Mean 24-hour plasma glucose concentration was calculated for each profile and then averaged across profiles performed in the week before a visit. All calculated values up to Week 26 and Week 52 were taken into account in the analysis, regardless of adherence to treatment. Change in mean 24-hour plasma glucose concentration at Weeks 26 and 52 was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 and Week 52 values, respectively. Missing changes at Week 26 and Week 52 were imputed using a return-to-baseline multiple imputation method (values imputed as participant baseline plus an error). Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained using ANCOVA analysis on data obtained from the multiple imputations (results were combined using Rubin's formulae).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, and Week 52
Change in Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) Excursion From Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52
Plasma glucose excursions were calculated at breakfast, lunch and dinner for each 7-point SMPG profile, as 2-hour PPG minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to start of the meal. Values of plasma glucose excursions at each visit were then calculated as the average across profiles performed in the week before the visit. All calculated values up to Week 26 and Week 52 were taken into account in the analysis, regardless of adherence to treatment. Change in PPG excursions at Weeks 26 and 52 was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 and Week 52 values, respectively. Missing changes at Week 26 and Week 52 were imputed using a return-to-baseline multiple imputation method (values imputed as participant baseline plus an error). Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained using ANCOVA analysis on data obtained from the multiple imputations (results were combined using Rubin's formulae).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, and Week 52
Change in 7-Point SMPG Profiles From Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52 Per Time Point
7-point SMPG profiles were measured at the following 7 points at each visit (Baseline, Week 26, and Week 52): before breakfast, 2 hours after breakfast, before lunch, 2 hours after lunch, before dinner, 2 hours after dinner, and bedtime. For each time point, the value at each visit was calculated as the average of values obtained for the same time point across profiles performed in the week before the visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, and Week 52
Number of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Event
Severe hypoglycemia was an event in which the participant required the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions, because the participant was not capable of helping self. Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of \<=3.9 mmol/L (\<=70 mg/dL) or plasma glucose level of \<3.0 mmol/L (\<54 mg/dL).
Time frame: From first injection of investigational medicinal product (IMP) up to Week 26 or up to 1 day after last injection of IMP, whichever comes earlier, for Week 26 analysis, and from first injection of IMP up to 1 day after last injection of IMP for Week 52
Number of Hypoglycemia Events Per Participant-Year
Number of hypoglycemia events (any, severe and documented \[both thresholds\]) per participant-year of exposure were reported. Severe hypoglycemia was an event in which the participant required the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions, because the participant was not capable of helping self. Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of \<=3.9 mmol/L (\<=70 mg/dL) or plasma glucose level of \<3.0 mmol/L (\<54 mg/dL).
Time frame: From first injection of investigational medicinal product (IMP) up to Week 26 or up to 1 day after last injection of IMP, whichever comes earlier, for Week 26 analysis, and from first injection of IMP up to 1 day after last injection of IMP for Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Hypersensitivity Reactions and Injection Site Reactions
Participants with at least one treatment-emergent adverse event linked to hypersensitivity reaction and injection site reaction regardless of relationship to IMP during the main 6-month and the 12-month on-treatment periods was assessed and reported.
Time frame: From first injection of IMP up to Week 26 or up to 1 day after last injection of IMP, whichever comes earlier, for Week 26 analysis, and from first injection of IMP up to 1 day after last injection of IMP for Week 52
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Positive Anti-Insulin Aspart Antibodies (AIA) Sample
Participants with at least one positive AIA sample at baseline or at any time during the on-treatment period (Prevalence).
Time frame: From first injection of IMP up to Week 26 or up to 1 day after last injection of IMP, whichever comes earlier, for Week 26 analysis, and from first injection of IMP up to 1 day after last injection of IMP for Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Induced, Treatment-Boosted and Treatment-Emergent Anti-insulin Aspart Antibodies (AIAs)
AIA incidence were categorized as: treatment-induced, treatment-boosted AIAs, and treatment-emergent AIA. 1) Participants with treatment-induced AIAs were those who developed AIA following IMP administration (participants with at least one positive AIA sample at any time during on-treatment period, in those participants without pre-existing AIA or with missing baseline sample). 2) Participants with treatment-boosted AIAs were those with pre-existing AIAs that were boosted to a significant higher titer following IMP administration (participants with at least one AIA sample with at least a 4-fold increase in titers compared to baseline value at any time during on-treatment period). 3) Participants with treatment-emergent AIA were defined as participants with treatment-induced, or treatment-boosted AIAs.
Time frame: From first injection of IMP up to Week 26 or up to 1 day after last injection of IMP, whichever comes earlier, for Week 26 analysis, and from first injection of IMP up to 1 day after last injection of IMP for Week 52
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Investigational Site Number 8400014
La Jolla, California, United States
Investigational Site Number 8400043
Los Angeles, California, United States
Investigational Site Number 8400036
Pomona, California, United States
Investigational Site Number 8400011
Santa Barbara, California, United States
Investigational Site Number 8400013
Ventura, California, United States
...and 72 more locations