Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) is a highly prevalent but poorly understood condition with limited treatment options. Current therapies, including a nonabsorbable antibiotic rifaximin or diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP), show efficacy in 50% or less of patients. In this proposal, participants with IBS-D will be randomized to receive either rifaximin or low FODMAP dietary intervention.
Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) is a highly prevalent but poorly understood condition with limited treatment options. Recent evidence has established small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and alterations in fecal microbiota as potential etiologies in the pathogenesis of IBS-D. Current therapies, including a nonabsorbable antibiotic rifaximin or diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP), show efficacy in 50% or less of patients \[1-4\]. It has been postulated that limited responses to therapies may stem from failure to identify distinct subgroups in IBS-D stratified by gut microbial profiles. In this proposal, participants with IBS-D will be randomized to receive either rifaximin or low FODMAP dietary intervention. The results of fecal microbiota-derived data as well as hydrogen breath tests will then be longitudinally followed to define SIBO. These methods will be used to test the hypotheses that: (i) distinct IBS-D phenotypes can be generated by defining fecal microbial populations as well as delineating the presence or absence of SIBO; and (ii) longitudinal analyses using microbe-derived metrics and SIBO status may relate to response to treatment with rifaximin or low FODMAP dietary intervention.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
74
Rifaximin 550 mg three times daily for 14 days
Low FODMAP dietary intervention for 4 weeks
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Change in Mean Daily Abdominal Pain
Change in mean daily abdominal pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) after intervention compared with baseline. VAS was a scale of 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating a higher degree of pain; 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated severe pain.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 5
Change in Mean Daily Bloating
Change in mean daily bloating was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) after intervention compared with baseline. VAS was a scale of 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating a higher degree of bloating; 0 indicated no bloating and 10 indicated severe bloating.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 5
Change in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) Symptom Severity Scale
The IBS Symptom Severity Scale was comprised of 5 questions each of which was on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The total range of the scale was 0 to 500, with 0 meaning no IBS symptoms and 500 indicating severe IBS symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 5
Change in Gastrointestinal System Ratings Scale (GSRS)
The GSRS was a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting Reflux, Abdominal Pain, Indigestion, Diarrhea, and Constipation. The GSRS had a seven-point graded Likert scale where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms. The total range of the scale is 15 to 105 with 15 meaning low symptom burden and 105 meaning high symptom burden.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 5
Change in Stool Form
The Bristol Stool Form Scale was a diagnostic tool used to assess various digestive issues based on the type and shape of stool. The total range of the scale was 1 to 7, with 1 indicating hard stool and 7 indicating liquid stool.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 5
Change in Psychological Function
The PHQ-9 was a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring, and measuring the severity of depression. It is comprised of 9 questions, each ranging from 0 to 3 with higher values indicating more severe depression symptoms. The total range of the scale was 1 to 27, with 1 indicating no or minimal depression and 27 indicating severe depression.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 5
Change in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life Instrument (IBS-QOL)
IBS-QOL was a condition-specific instrument for assessing health-related quality of life among persons with IBS. The IBS-QOL was comprised of 34 questions, each with a 5-point scale where the higher the value indicated the higher quality of life. The total range of the scale was 0 to 100, with 0 indicating no quality of life and 100 indicating extremely good quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 5
24-hour Diet Recall/Intake - Lactose
Participants completed entries using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR), which was a Windows-based dietary analysis program designed for the collection and analyses of 24-hour dietary recalls, food records, menus, and recipes. The NDSR was incapable of collecting data on all FODMAP-type foods, aside from lactose and gluten. The results represent data from lactose as a surrogate for all other FODMAP foods.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 5
24-hour Diet Recall/Intake - Gluten
Participants completed entries using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR), which was a Windows-based dietary analysis program designed for the collection and analyses of 24-hour dietary recalls, food records, menus, and recipes. The NDSR was incapable of collecting data on all FODMAP-type foods, aside from lactose and gluten. The results represent data from gluten as a surrogate for all other FODMAP foods.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 5