The aim of this trial is to compare the safety, efficacy and cost effectiveness of the three types of scopes.
With the advancement of technology, flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) has become an attractive option for surgical management of kidney stones. However, the durability of flexible ureteroscope still remains a major concern. Due to the high cost and limited durability, the cost-benefit of non-disposable flexible ureteroscope continues to be the most important factor for initiating and maintaining fURS programs worldwide, especially in the developing countries. Nowadays, disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes are available, offering an improved image resolution, no need for sterilization and repair, and more economic.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
450
All participants in this arm will undergo RIRS using a single use digital ureteroscope.
All participants under this arm will undergo RIRS using a reusable fiberoptic ureteroscope
All participants under this arm will undergo RIRS using reusable digital flexible ureteroscope
cost of surgery
the total cost of the procedure
Time frame: intraoperative
Stone free rate
Time frame: 1month after surgery
stone free rate
Time frame: 3months after surgery
complication rates
Time frame: upto 3months
operative time
Time frame: intraoperative
operator's satisfaction with the scope
on the scope or 1-10
Time frame: intraoperative
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.