The primary objective of Part 1 of this study is to evaluate the effects of BIIB033 versus placebo on disability improvement over 72 weeks. The primary objective of Part 2 of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety profile of BIIB033 as an add-on therapy in participants with MS. The secondary objective of Part 1 is to evaluate the effects of BIIB033 versus placebo on additional measures of disability improvement. The secondary objective of Part 2 is to investigate long-term efficacy (disability improvement) and additional safety measures of BIIB033 as an add-on therapy in participants with MS.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
263
Administered as specified in the treatment arm
Administered as specified in the treatment arm
Research Site
Cullman, Alabama, United States
Research Site
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
Research Site
Berkeley, California, United States
Research Site
Long Beach, California, United States
Research Site
Newport Beach, California, United States
Research Site
Part 1: Overall Response Score
Overall Response Score is a multicomponent score based on 4 components: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test in the dominant hand (9HPT-D), and 9HPT in the nondominant hand (9HPT-ND). Overall Score was sum of 4 components at each visit and ranges from +4 (improvement) to -4 (worsening). At each visit, each component is given a score relative to baseline (BL): -1 if threshold is met for worsening, 0 if no changes meet threshold criteria, or +1 if threshold is met for improvement. For T25FW and 9HPT improvement is ≥15% decrease in time from BL and worsening is ≥15% increase in time from BL. For EDSS, improvement is: ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of ≤6.0, and worsening is defined as a ≥1-point increase from a BL score of ≤5.5 or a ≥0.5-point increase from a BL score equal to 6.0. Positive Overall Response Score indicated that there was improvement in more components than there was worsening.
Time frame: Part 1: Baseline to Week 72
Part 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, life-threatening event, requires inpatient hospitalization, significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly.
Time frame: Part 2: Baseline to Week 169
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND
EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. For EDSS, improvement is defined as a ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of ≤6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time indicates slower walking. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT ≥15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement.
Time frame: Part 1: Baseline to Week 72
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, or 3-Second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT-3)
EDSS measures disability status over time in MS (scale range: 0-10), higher scores=more disability and improvement defined as ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from BL score ≤6.0. T25FW is quantitative mobility and leg function performance test, where timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time=slower walking. 9HPT is quantitative test of upper extremity function, measures time to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove pegs. Longer time=poorer upper limb function. PASAT assesses auditory information processing speed. In 3-second PASAT, numbers are presented at a rate of 1 every 3 seconds with scores (range 0-120), higher scores=better working memory. For T25FW and 9HPT ≥15% decrease in time from BL is improvement. For PASAT ≥15% increase from BL is improvement.
Time frame: Part 1: Baseline to Week 72
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND, and Without Confirmed Worsening in Any of the 4 Assessments During the 72 Weeks of the Study
EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. For EDSS, improvement is defined as a ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of ≤6.0, and worsening is defined as a ≥1-point increase from a BL score of ≤5.5 or a ≥0.5-point increase from a BL score equal to 6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time indicates slower walking. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT ≥15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement and ≥15% increase in time from BL indicates worsening.
Time frame: Part 1: Baseline to Week 72
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale (range 0-10), higher scores=more disability. For EDSS, improvement is: a ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of ≤6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time=slower walking. 9HPT is quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove pegs. Longer time=poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT ≥15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement. The SDMT measures time to pair abstract geometric symbols with specific numbers. The score is the number of correctly coded items (range 0-110) in 90 seconds, higher scores=better outcome. Improvement is: ≥4-point increase from BL.
Time frame: Part 1: Baseline to Week 72
Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND (20% Thresholds for T25FW and 9HPT)
EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. For EDSS, improvement is defined as a ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of ≤6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time indicates slower walking. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT ≥15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement.
Time frame: Part 1: Baseline to Week 72
Part 2: Overall Response Score
Time frame: Part 2: Baseline to Week 96
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND
Time frame: Part 2: Baseline to Week 108
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, or PASAT-3
Time frame: Part 2: Baseline to Week 108
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND, and Without Confirmed Worsening in Any of the 4 Assessments During the 96 Weeks of the Study
Time frame: Part 2: Baseline to Week 96
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, and SDMT
Time frame: Part 2: Baseline to Week 108
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND (20% Thresholds for T25FW and 9HPT)
Time frame: Part 2: Baseline to Week 108
Part 2: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values
Laboratory assessments including hematology and blood chemistry were evaluated for safety. Criteria for abnormality: In 10\^9/liter (L) \[white blood cells \<3.0/\>16, neutrophils \<1.5/ \>13.5, lymphocytes \<0.8/ \>12, monocytes \>2.5, eosinophils \>1.6, basophils \>1.6, platelets \<=75/ \>=700\], hemoglobin \<=95 \[female (F)\] or \<=115 \[male (M)\] or \>=175 (F) or \>=190 (M) gram per liter (g/L), hematocrit \<=32 (F) or \<=37 (M) or \>=54 (F) or \>=60 (M) percentage (%), red blood cells \<=3.5/ \>=6.4 10\^12/L, in millimoles per liter (mmol/L) \[sodium \<=126/ \>=156, potassium \<=3/ \>=6, chloride \<=90/ \>=118, bicarbonate \<=16/ \>=35, calcium \<=2/ \>=3, phosphorous \<=0.5491/ \>=1.7119, glucose (non-fasting) \<=2.2/\>=13.75\], AST/SGOT \>=3x upper limit of normal (ULN), ALT/SGPT \>=3xULN, alkaline phosphatase \>=3xULN, creatinine \>=1.5xULN, total bilirubin \>=1.5xULN, total protein \<=45/ \>=100 g/L, albumin \<=25 g/L, uric acid \>=501.5 (F)/\>=619.5 (M) micromole (umol)/L
Time frame: Part 2: Baseline to Week 96
Part 2: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values
The ECG result was classified as "normal", "abnormal", "abnormal, not adverse event", or "abnormal, adverse event". Shift to 'abnormal, not adverse event' included shift from normal or unknown to 'abnormal, not adverse event'. Shift to 'abnormal, adverse event' included shift from normal or unknown to 'abnormal, adverse event'.
Time frame: Part 2: Baseline to Week 96
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values
Vital sign measurements including temperature, pulse rate (supine), systolic blood pressure (BP) and diastolic (supine) BP were evaluated for safety. Criteria for abnormalities: Temperature: \>38 degree celsius (◦C) or \>=1 ◦C increase from baseline (BL); Pulse: \[\>100 beats per minute (bpm) or increase from BL of \>30 bpm\] or (\<40 bpm or decrease from BL of \>20 bpm); Systolic BP: \[\>160 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)/increase from BL of \>40 mmHg\] or (\<90 mmHg/decrease from BL of \>30 mmHg); Diastolic BP: (\>100 mmHg/increase from BL of \>30 mmHg) or (\<45 mmHg/decrease from BL of \>20 mmHg).
Time frame: Part 2: Baseline to Week 96
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Weight Values
Criteria for abnormality was defined as a \>7% increase or decrease in weight at the specified time point.
Time frame: Part 2: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96
Part 2: Number of Participants With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score at Any Post-Baseline Visit
C-SSRS systematically assess suicidal ideation and behavior rating scale. It rates an individual's degree of suicidal ideation on a scale, ranging from "wish to be dead" to "active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent and behaviors". The scale identifies specific behaviors ranging from "preparatory acts or behavior" to "suicide" which may be indicative of an individual's intent to complete suicide.
Time frame: Part 2: Baseline to Week 96
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Orange, California, United States
Research Site
Centennial, Colorado, United States
Research Site
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
Research Site
Stamford, Connecticut, United States
Research Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
...and 149 more locations