This study is a prospective randomised trial where a computer will randomly allocate patients to one of two possible methods of delivering oxygen during the procedure of bronchoscopy. This trial compares high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with nasal prongs in delivering oxygen to patients undergoing endo-bronchial ultrasound guided trans- bronchial nodal aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) a specialised form of bronchoscopy procedure. HFNC uses humidified higher gas flow rates than conventional low flow systems such as nasal prongs which are limited by the respiratory rate and effort.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
40
humidified high flow nasal oxygen
University Hospital Galway
Galway, Ireland
drop in oxygen saturation during procedure
the difference in oxygen saturation levels between pre-treatment assessments and the lowest saturation level achieved during treatment
Time frame: through procedure completion defined as withdrawing scope from patient's mouth, an average of 30 minutes
change in venous CO2
Change in venous CO2 1 hour after procedure compared to pre-procedure level
Time frame: 1 hour after procedure
end tidal CO2 during procedure
Measured with tip of scope at lower trachea
Time frame: through procedure completion defined as withdrawing scope from patient's mouth an average of 30 minutes
Patient experience measure on a visual analogue scale
Time frame: up to 3 hours after procedure
endotracheal intubation during or post procedure
Time frame: 24 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.