Gaps in delivery of gender-sensitive comprehensive care have resulted in disparities in quality and patient experience among women seen in VA. VA policy action providing guidance on delivery of comprehensive healthcare services for women Veterans was disseminated nationally in 2010, followed by annual assessments and site visits evaluating local VA efforts. While substantial inroads have been made, policy implementation, even when leveraged by field-based women's health leaders, has not been uniformly successful in achieving delivery of comprehensive care by designated providers in gender-sensitive care environments that ensure women's privacy, dignity and safety, all tenets of the original guidance and the updated directive (2017). Building on prior effectiveness of an evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) approach to tailoring VA's medical home model -- Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) -- to the needs of women Veterans, VA leaders in women's health adopted EBQI to help low-performing VAs systematically improve services. The objectives of the resulting Partnered Evaluation Initiative (PEI) funded by VA's Quality Enhancement Research Initiative and VA Office of Women's Health were: 1. To evaluate barriers and facilitators to achieving delivery of comprehensive women's health care in the identified low-performing VAs; 2. To evaluate effectiveness of EBQI in supporting low-performing VA facilities achieve improved organizational features, provider/staff attitudes, quality of care, and patient experiences among women Veteran patients; and, 3. To evaluate contextual factors, local implementation processes, and organizational changes in the participating facilities over time.
Gaps in delivery of gender-sensitive comprehensive care have resulted in disparities in quality and patient experience among women seen in VA. VA policy action providing guidance on delivery of comprehensive healthcare services for women Veterans was disseminated nationally in 2010, followed by annual assessments and site visits evaluating local VA efforts. While substantial inroads have been made, policy implementation, even when leveraged by field-based women's health leaders, has not been uniformly successful in achieving delivery of comprehensive care by designated providers in gender-sensitive care environments that ensure women's privacy, dignity and safety, all tenets of the original guidance and the updated VA directive (2017). In collaboration with VA Women's Health Services (WHS), VA researchers developed a series of studies to better understand and help improve comprehensive care implementation through the Women Veterans' Healthcare CREATE Initiative. Among these, one focused on testing an evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) approach to tailoring VA's medical home model -- Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) -- to the needs of women Veterans, which has yielded significant local improvements in women Veterans' care. EBQI emphasizes a multilevel partnered approach to building capacity for innovation, implementation and spread of evidence-based practice. With its demonstrated success in the CREATE PACT study and several other EBQI trials, WHS adopted EBQI as a strategy to help low-performing VA facilities systematically improve services. The objectives of the WHS/QUERI Partnered Evaluation Initiative that this project represents are: 1. To evaluate the barriers and facilitators to achieving delivery of comprehensive women's health care in the identified low-performing VA facilities; 2. To evaluate the effectiveness of EBQI in supporting low-performing VA facilities achieve improved: 1. Organizational features (e.g., level of comprehensive services available; care coordination arrangements; PACT features implemented; environment of care improvements); 2. Provider/staff attitudes (e.g., improved gender awareness; women's health knowledge and practice); d) Quality of care and patient experiences among women Veteran patients using secondary data; and, 3. To evaluate contextual factors, local implementation processes, and organizational changes in the participating facilities over time. Results of the evaluation have been used to provide feedback to stakeholders, including women Veterans, at the local, network and national levels, while also being used to continuously refine EBQI implementation processes. The evaluation is also helping inform optimal strategies for ongoing improvements in women Veterans' care in the 21 participating VA facilities, other VA facilities and for other improvement initiatives in this and other national program offices.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
21
Multilevel research-clinical partnership approach to supporting local strategic planning, priority setting, skill building and engagement in addressing targeted healthcare delivery problems. Launched at participating VA facilities through advance key stakeholder interviews, in-person site visits, data review (e.g., structure and environment of care, gender disparities in quality and patient experience), QI education/training, technical support (e.g., QI project and measures development), additional formative feedback from the evaluation (e.g., provider/survey measure summaries), external and internal practice facilitation, and across-EBQI site collaboration calls. Local leadership, EBQI champions and QI teams develop and implement innovation projects aimed at improving prioritized quality targets related to women Veterans' health and healthcare needs as well as facility-level structural changes needed to improve compliance with VA guidelines.
Central Alabama Veterans Health Care System West Campus, Montgomery, AL
Montgomery, Alabama, United States
Northern Arizona VA Health Care System, Prescott, AZ
Prescott, Arizona, United States
VA Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA
Sacramento, California, United States
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA
Sepulveda, California, United States
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO
Denver, Colorado, United States
Gender-sensitive Care Environment
Multi-item scale score reflecting survey items (from The Women's Assessment Tool for Comprehensive Health (WATCH)) on availability of same-gender providers, availability of same-gender staff, privacy of physical layout, availability of privacy curtains, level of implementation of local culture campaign that values and treats Women Veterans with respect. The score ranges from 0 to 7, with a higher score reflecting greater gender-sensitive care environment.
Time frame: 12-month change in gender-sensitive care environment
Gender-sensitive Care Environment
Multi-item scale score reflecting survey items (from The Women's Assessment Tool for Comprehensive Health (WATCH)) on availability of same-gender providers, availability of same-gender staff, privacy of physical layout, availability of privacy curtains, level of implementation of local culture campaign that values and treats Women Veterans with respect. The score ranges from 0 to 7, with a higher score reflecting greater gender-sensitive care environment.
Time frame: 24-month change in gender-sensitive care environment
Gender Awareness
A 12-item score reflecting primary care and women's health providers' and staff's awareness and knowledge of women Veterans' military background and healthcare needs. The score ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores reflecting greater gender awareness.
Time frame: 12-month change in gender awareness among VA primary care and women's health providers and staff.
Gender Awareness
A 12-item score reflecting primary care and women's health providers' and staff's awareness and knowledge of women Veterans' military roles and healthcare needs . The score ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores reflecting greater gender awareness.
Time frame: 24-month change in gender awareness among VA primary care and women's health providers and staff
Quality Improvement Experience
The count of quality improvement activities reported by providers and staff in primary care and women's health settings; including 1) training in quality improvement methods, 2) collaboration with other VA facilities to identify best practices, 3) working with Women Veteran Program Manager to identify and/or solve local problems in caring for women Veterans, 4) using of VA performance data, 5) using of VA survey data by gender, 6) working on a quality improvement project focused on women Veterans, 7) involving in small tests of change for quality improvement.
Time frame: 12-month change
Quality Improvement Experience
The count of quality improvement activities reported by provider and staff in primary care and women's health settings; including 1) training in quality improvement methods \[e.g., LEAN\], 2) collaboration with other VA facilities to identify best practices, 3) working with Women Veteran Program Manager to identify and/or solve local problems in caring for women Veterans, 4) using of VA performance data, 5) using of VA survey data by gender, 6) working on a quality improvement project focused on women Veterans, 7) involving in small tests of change for quality improvement.
Time frame: 24-month change
Gender-specific Preventive Care Delivery
Rate of cervical cancer screening using the VA External Peer Review Program (EPRP) chart-based quality metrics.
Time frame: 12-month change
Gender-specific Preventive Care Delivery
Rate of cervical cancer screening using the VA External Peer Review Program (EPRP) chart-based quality metrics.
Time frame: 24-month change in gender-specific preventive care delivery
Accessibility of Care
Women Veterans' ratings of accessibility based on the Survey of Healthcare Experience of Patients (SHEP) program. The mean score is the percent of female patients who responded "always" to validated survey items measuring accessibility, the higher percentage representing better access.
Time frame: 12-month change in accessibility
Accessibility of Care
Women Veterans' ratings of accessibility from the Survey of Healthcare Experience of Patients (SHEP) program. The mean score is the percent of female patients who responded "always" to validated survey items measuring accessibility, the higher percentage representing better access.
Time frame: 24-month change in accessibility
Coordination of Care
Women Veterans' ratings of care coordination from the Survey of Healthcare Experience of Patients (SHEP) program. The mean score is the percent of female patients who responded "always" to validated survey items measuring care coordination, the higher percentage representing better coordination.
Time frame: 12-month change
Coordination of Care
Women Veterans' ratings of care coordination from the Survey of Healthcare Experience of Patients (SHEP) program. The mean score is the percent of female patients who responded "always" to validated survey items measuring care coordination, the higher percentage representing better coordination.
Time frame: 24-month change
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL
Miami, Florida, United States
Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Carl Vinson VA Medical Center, Dublin, GA
Dublin, Georgia, United States
Marion VA Medical Center, Marion, IL
Marion, Illinois, United States
...and 15 more locations
Gender-neutral Guideline-concordant Preventive Care Receipt
Percentage of women Veterans' obtaining recommended preventive care based on eligibility for service (e.g., meet eligibility guidelines for timely eye exams for diabetes, flu vaccination, colorectal cancer screening) using VA External Peer Review Program (EPRP) chart-based quality metrics.
Time frame: 12-month change
Gender-neutral Guideline-concordant Preventive Care Receipt
Percentage of women Veterans' obtaining recommended preventive care based on eligibility for service (e.g., meet eligibility guidelines for timely eye exams for diabetes, flu vaccination, colorectal cancer screening) using VA External Peer Review Program (EPRP) chart-based quality metrics
Time frame: 24-month change
Assignment to a Designated Women's Health Provider or a Women's Health Primary Care Teams, Using Patient Aligned Care Teams Compass
Percentage of women Veterans assigned to a designated women's health provider in a general primary care and/or women's health primary care setting.
Time frame: 12-month change
Assignment to a Designated Women's Health Provider or a Women's Health Primary Care Teams, Using Patient Aligned Care Teams Compass
Percentage of women Veterans assigned to a designated women's health provider in a general primary care and/or women's health primary care setting
Time frame: 24-month change
Provider Rating
Percent of women patients who rated 9 or 10 on a scale of 0 to 10 for the provider rating question on the Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP). Higher scores are better.
Time frame: 12 month change
Provider Rating
Percent of women patients who rated 9 or 10 on a scale of 0 to 10 for the provider rating question from the Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP). Higher scores are better.
Time frame: 24-month change