The International Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty (BPA) Registry is a prospective, multi-center, long-term observational project. Scheduled to start data collection in Q4 2017, the registry will run for approximately four years with a follow-up time for each patient of at least two years. Its primary objective is to investigate the efficacy and safety of BPA intervention in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) not amenable to pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA).
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
500
BPA is an interventional technique where a balloon catheter is used to recanalize affected segments of pulmonary arteries identified during angiography.
University of California San Diego
La Jolla, California, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Safety as assessed by BPA-associated complications
Time frame: Min. 2 years
Efficacy as assessed by change in PVR
Change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) from baseline to latest post-interventional follow-up hemodynamics
Time frame: Min. 2 years
Efficacy as assessed by change in mPAP
Change in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) from baseline to latest post-interventional follow-up hemodynamics
Time frame: Min. 2 years
Compare volume of BPA cases across regions and case load at the end of recruitment
Time frame: Min. 2 years
Analyze patient selection criteria for BPA across sites at the end of recruitment
Time frame: Min. 2 years
At the end of follow-up, compare technical aspects of BPA as asssed by imaging modalities as used by the sites
Imaging modalities encompass VQ scan, selective pulmonary angiogram, CT pulmonary angiogram, dual-energy CT, cone-beam CT, MRI, OCT and IVUS
Time frame: Min. 2 years
At the end of follow-up, compare technical aspects of BPA as assessed by investigator-reported session goals
Time frame: Min. 2 years
At the end of follow-up, compare technical aspects of BPA as assessed by number of sessions per patient and follow-up
Time frame: Min. 2 years
At the end of follow-up, compare technical aspects of BPA as assessed by number of interventions per patient and follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Temple University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University Clinics
Vienna, Austria
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven
Leuven, Belgium
General University Hospital
Prague, Czechia
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble-Alpes
Grenoble, France
L'Hôpital Marie Lannelongue
Le Plessis-Robinson, France
...and 8 more locations
Time frame: Min. 2 years
At the end of follow-up, compare technical aspects of BPA as assessed by technical limits
Time frame: Min. 2 years
Analyze the use of PH targeted medical therapy before BPA
PH targeted therapy will be categorised as prostacyclin, IP agonist, PDE5 inhibitor, ERA, guanylate cyclase stimulator and other
Time frame: Min. 2 years
Analyze the use of PH targeted medical therapy after BPA
PH targeted therapy will be categorised as prostacyclin, IP agonist, PDE5 inhibitor, ERA, guanylate cyclase stimulator and other
Time frame: Min. 2 years
Analyze the impact of PH targeted medical treatment on key patient outcomes
PH targeted therapy will be categorised as prostacyclin, IP agonist, PDE5 inhibitor, ERA, guanylate cyclase stimulator and other Key patient outcomes encompass WHO functional class, 6-minute-walk-distance, Borg dyspnoe score, haemodynamics and mortality
Time frame: Min. 2 years
Health care resource use required to complete BPA
As assessed by total hospital days in/out
Time frame: Min. 2 years