This is a randomized controlled trial comparing lay Lady Health Workers (Lay Health Workers) with Family Welfare Workers (Clinically- trained Health Workers) on quantitative measures of safety and effectiveness of Depo Provera and Sayana Press provision in a clinic setting. This comparative trial will test the non-inferiority hypothesis that Lady Health Workers are just as competent as clinically-trained Family Welfare Workers in screening and counseling first-time injectable users. These first time users will also be randomly assigned to receive intramuscular or subcutaneous injections of DMPA.
FHI 360 and Jhpiego in collaboration with USAID, Aga Khan University (AKU) and the Government of Sindh province propose a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to provide evidence that could change current policies in Pakistan that forbid initiation of DMPA by Lady Health Workers (LHWs). Positive findings on the safety and effectiveness of LHW-initiation of DMPA may also prompt the WHO to consider modifying the recommendation for targeted M\&E for lay health worker provision of intramuscular injectable contraceptives. The trial will compare the screening and counseling of (LHWs)-the main lay health worker cadre--with that of Family Welfare Workers (FWWs) who are clinically-trained. The Government of Sindh province also expressed interest in introducing Pfizer's subcutaneous form of Depo Provera, Sayana Press® (SP) in Pakistan, which could simplify administration of injectable contraceptives. As such, an SP arm will be included in the trial, which will be facilitated by relevant training of LHWs and FWWs by Jhpiego and stocks provided by a special USAID procurement, since the registration process for SP in Pakistan is ongoing. A successful RCT demonstrating the non-inferiority of LHWs vis á vis FWWs on first-dose initiation of Depo Provera IM (DMPA IM) and (SP) would facilitate efforts to expand CBA2I in Pakistan, and in turn improve access to family planning services for a potentially large number of underserved women.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
460
The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use DMPA.
The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use Sayana Press
Aga Khan University
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
Number of Participants That Were Appropriately Screened for Contraceptive Use
Number of participants that were appropriately screened for injectable contraceptive use in both rural and urban settings in Pakistan.
Time frame: 3 months from randomization
Number of Participants That Were Appropriately Counseled for DMPA Use.
Number of participants that were appropriately counseled by both types of providers in both urban and rural settings.
Time frame: 3 months from randomization
Proportion of Clients Providers Who Report Satisfaction With the DMPA Method Received From the Provider
DMPA clients served by both types of providers in both urban and rural settings will report whether or not they were satisfied with the DMPA method provided to them.
Time frame: 3 months from randomization
Proportion of Clients Who Report Satisfaction With Provider Services
Clients who received intramuscular or subcutaneous DMPA injections will report whether or not they were satisfied with the services provided to them by their provider.
Time frame: 3 months from randomization
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.