This study compares two established surgical treatments for acetabular labral tears. Patients will be prospectively recruited and randomised to either labral repair or debridement. All patients will be followed for 2 years after intervention with a primary outcome assessment at 6 months.
STUDY DESIGN Study design This will be a two-arm randomised controlled parallel group superiority study and will take place in a hospital setting. Stratification will be performed for sex and age by means of a minimisation technique during randomisation for each subject entering the trial. Study population: Adults between 18 and 75 years of age diagnosed with symptomatic acetabular labral tears demonstrated on MRI arthrogram but without radiographic evidence of OA ie: Kellgren \& Lawrence grade less than 2 randomly selected from the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre outpatient clinics. Arm 1 Arthroscopic acetabular labral repair. Arm 2 Arthroscopic acetabular labral resection 48 patients per arm (total 96 patients) will be selected from outpatient clinics and the operative waiting list (pre-operative assessment clinics) at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford. The surgeries will be conducted using routine instrumentation in use at the centre. STUDY PROCEDURES Recruitment All patients will undergo surgery in accordance with established practice regardless of their treatment allocation. Arthroscopy will be performed using standard anterior and lateral portals for insertion of instruments. All patients will undergo arthroscopic evaluation of the entire joint. Subsequent procedures will vary according to treatment allocation: * Arm 1 - Labral Repair - acetabular labral tear will be identified and reattached using suture anchors until a stable repair is achieved. If evidence of FAI is present ie: a cam or pincer lesion is identified then this will be treated with osteochondroplasty (cam) or acetabular rim recession (pincer). * Arm 2 - Labral Resection - the acetabular labral tear will be identified and its' limits defined. The torn portion of labrum will be resected to a stable edge. As with arm 1 there will be treatment of FAI if identified.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
96
Acetabular labral tear will be identified and reattached using suture anchors until a stable repair is achieved. If evidence of FAI is present ie: a cam or pincer lesion is identified then this will be treated with osteochondroplasty (cam) or acetabular rim recession (pincer).
The acetabular labral tear will be identified and its' limits defined. The torn portion of labrum will be resected to a stable edge. As with arm 1 there will be treatment of FAI if identified.
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals Trust
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGHip Outcome Score
Change in Hip Outcome Score (Activities of Daily Living Subscale) at 6 months post intervention from baseline.
Time frame: 6 Months Post Intervention
Hip Outcome Scores (HOS)
Hip Outcome Score at 12, 18 and 24 months post-operatively.
Time frame: 12, 18 & 24 months post intervention
Physiologic MRI
T2 relaxation time
Time frame: 6 Months Post Intervention
X Ray
Joint space width
Time frame: 6 Months Post Intervention
X Ray
Kellgren-Lawrence score
Time frame: 6 Months Post Intervention
Biomarkers of Osteo Arthritis (OA)
Biomarkers of OA from synovial fluid and serum.
Time frame: At surgery and 6, 12 & 24 months post intervention.
Clinical Assessment of Function
Clinical assessment of range of motion and impingement tests.
Time frame: 6, 12 & 24 months post intervention.
Health Economics
Assessment of economic burden associated with disease using EQ5D score
Time frame: 6, 12, 18 & 24 months post intervention
Physiologic MRI
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
T1 Rho
Time frame: 6 Months Post Intervention