The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of ASP5094 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with background methotrexate (MTX).
The study drug will be intravenously administered.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
66
intravenously administration
intravenously administration
MTX must have been continuously orally administered for at least 90 days prior to screening, with stable dosage for at least 28 days prior to screening, and will be continuously administered with the same dosage throughout the study period.
Site JP00002
Asahikawa, Japan
Site JP00027
ACR50 response rate
To assess ACR (American College of Rheumatology) 50 for efficacy
Time frame: Week 12
ACR50 response rate
To assess ACR (American College of Rheumatology) 50 for efficacy
Time frame: Up to Week 16
ACR20 response rate
To assess ACR (American College of Rheumatology) 20 for efficacy
Time frame: Up to Week 16
ACR70 response rate
To assess ACR (American College of Rheumatology) 70 for efficacy
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Change from baseline in DAS28-CRP score
To assess DAS28-CRP (Disease Activity Score28 - C-reactive protein) for efficacy
Time frame: Baseline and Up to Week 16
Change from baseline in DAS28-ESR score
To assess DAS28-ESR (Disease Activity Score28 - Erythrocyte sedimentation rate) for efficacy
Time frame: Baseline and Up to Week 16
Change from baseline in Tender Joint Count (68 joints)
To assess Tender Joint Count for efficacy
Time frame: Baseline and Up to Week 16
Change from baseline in Swollen Joint Count (66 joints)
To assess Swollen Joint Count for efficacy
Time frame: Baseline and Up to Week 16
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Asahikawa, Japan
Site JP00029
Beppu, Japan
Site JP00015
Chiba, Japan
Site JP00008
Fukuoka, Japan
Site JP00009
Fukuoka, Japan
Site JP00026
Fukuoka, Japan
Site JP00016
Ichinomiya, Japan
Site JP00012
Kanuma, Japan
Site JP00028
Kawachi-Nagano, Japan
...and 21 more locations
Percentage of subjects achieving DAS28-CRP score for remission (<2.6)
To assess DAS28-CRP score for efficacy
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving DAS28-ESR score for remission (<2.6)
To assess DAS28-ESR score for efficacy
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving DAS28-CRP score for low disease activity (≦3.2)
To assess DAS28-CRP score for efficacy
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving DAS28-ESR score for low disease activity (≦3.2)
To assess DAS28-ESR score for efficacy
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Change from baseline in CRP
To assess CRP (C-reactive protein) for efficacy
Time frame: Baseline and Up to Week 16
Change from baseline in ESR
To assess ESR (Erythrocyte sedimentation rate) for efficacy
Time frame: Baseline and Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving EULAR response criteria of "Good Response"
To assess EULAR (European league Against Rheumatism) response criteria for efficacy
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving EULAR response criteria of "Good Response" or "Moderate Response"
To assess EULAR response criteria for efficacy
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving ACR/EULAR score for remission
To assess ACR/EULAR remission for efficacy
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving SDAI score ≦ 3.3 (SDAI remission)
To assess SDAI (Simplified Disease Activity Index) score for efficacy
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Percentage of subjects achieving CDAI score ≦ 2.8 (CDAI remission)
To assess CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) score for efficacy
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Change from baseline for the HAQ-DI
To assess HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index) for efficacy
Time frame: Baseline to Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by incidence of adverse events
Adverse events will be coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by laboratory tests: Hematology
To assess hematology as a criteria of safety variables.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by laboratory tests: Biochemistry
To assess Biochemistry as a criteria of safety variables.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by laboratory tests: Urinalysis
To assess Urinalysis as a criteria of safety variables.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by vital signs: Body temperature
To assess the vital sign as a criteria of safety variables.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by vital signs: Sitting blood pressure
To assess the vital sign as a criteria of safety variables.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by vital signs: pulse rate
To assess the vital sign as a criteria of safety variables.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by weight
To assess the weight as a criteria of safety variables.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Safety assessed by standard 12-lead electrocardiogram
To assess the cardiovascular system functioning as a criteria of safety variables.
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Serum concentration of ASP5094
To assess Serum concentration of ASP5094 for pharmacokinetics
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Serum concentration of TNF-α
To assess TNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor-α) for pharmacodynamics
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Serum concentration of MMP3
To assess MMP3 (Matrix metalloproteinase 3) for pharmacodynamics
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Serum concentration of IL-6
To assess IL-6 (Interleukin-6) for pharmacodynamics
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Anti-ASP5094 anti-bodies
To assess Anti-ASP5094 anti-bodies for immunogenicity
Time frame: Up to Week 16