Apixaban and rivaroxaban have been compared to standard therapy for treatment of acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and are both approved by Health Canada. No safety or efficacy data is available from direct head-to-head comparison of these two anticoagulants. Lawsuits in the United States over bleeding events, patient perceptions, and concerns with medication adherence are additional factors highlighting the importance of a comparison trial. This multi-center, pragmatic, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point (PROBE) trial aims to compare the safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban for the treatment of VTE.
VTE is the third leading cause of mortality by cardiovascular disease. Standard treatment for acute VTE uses a combination of parenteral Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (LMWH) and oral vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for 3 months, and carries significant bleeding risk. The major and/or clinically-relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) event rate is reported between 8.1-9.7% during initial treatment. This treatment is burdensome owing to subcutaneous injections, drug interactions, and laboratory monitoring. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are simpler to use and do not require laboratory monitoring. Rivaroxaban and apixaban are two DOACs targeting Factor Xa. Each DOAC was separately proven effective and safe when compared to standard treatment. Comparison of the bleeding rates between studies would favour use of apixaban over rivaroxaban; however, trial limitations and lack of direct comparison between these two agents makes it impossible to draw firm conclusions. This represents a dilemma in clinical practice because the absence of convincing differences in safety has led to genuine uncertainty about which DOAC has the best risk-to-benefit ratio. To address these limitations, a head-to-head randomized controlled trial (RCT) is needed to determine the safety (i.e. bleeding risk) of twice daily apixaban over once daily rivaroxaban during the first 3 months of acute VTE treatment. Eligibility criteria will be less stringent than the COBRRA pilot study and reflect real-world patients. Cost-effective analysis of apixaban twice daily compared to rivaroxaban once daily will also be performed.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
2,760
Refer to Apixaban group
Refer to Rivaroxaban group
The University of Sydney
Darlington, New South Wales, Australia
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Alberta Health Sciences
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
QEII Health Science Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Hamilton General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Juravinski Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
London Health Sciences Center
London, Ontario, Canada
...and 9 more locations
The Rate of Adjudicated Clinically Relevant Bleeding (CRB) Events
CRB events are defined as the composite of major bleeding (MB) events and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) events.
Time frame: For the duration of the study: 3 months
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Major Bleeding Events
Major bleeding will be defined as fatal bleeding, and/or, Symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ, such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra-articular or pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome, and/or bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin of ≥20 g/L, or leading to transfusion of ≥2 units of whole blood or red cells.
Time frame: For the duration of the study: 3 months
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Clinically Relevant Non-Major Bleeding Events
Clinically relevant non-major bleeding will be defined as any sign or symptom of hemorrhage (e.g., more bleeding than would be expected for a clinical circumstance, including bleeding found by imaging alone) that does not fit the criteria for the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) definition of major bleeding but does meet at least one of the following criteria: * Requiring medical intervention by a healthcare professional * Leading to hospitalization or increased level of care * Prompting a face to face (i.e., not just a telephone or electronic communication) evaluation
Time frame: For the duration of the study: 3 months
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Events
Recurrent VTE will be confirmed with investigational reports including clinic notes, D-dimer results and imaging as per standard of care. Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) will be confirmed by compression ultrasound revealing a new (compared to baseline/index ultrasound) area of non-compressibility in the popliteal vein or more proximal vein, or venography demonstrating a constant intraluminal filling defect in the popliteal vein or more proximal veins. Recurrent Pulmonary Embolism (PE) will be diagnosed if the Ventilation-Perfusion (VQ) scan is non-normal and a new unmatched segmental or greater perfusion defect is documented, or an intraluminal filling defect is seen on Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiogram (CTPA) in a segmental or greater vessel that was previously free of thrombus, or pulmonary angiography demonstrating a constant intraluminal filling defect or a cutoff of a vessel \>2.5 mm in diameter will be considered diagnostic for PE.
Time frame: For the duration of the study: 3 months
Number of Participants With Adjudicated VTE-Related Deaths
VTE-related death (fatal PE or unexplained deaths) will be confirmed using death certificates and/or autopsy findings.
Time frame: For the duration of the study: 3 months
All-cause Mortality
Using a binary outcome of an event or no event (Individual rates of death related to VTE, bleeding or other causes).
Time frame: For the duration of the study: 3 months
Medication Adherence
Reported as the number of patients self-reporting full medication adherence.
Time frame: For the duration of the study: 3 months
Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) Gained
We will measure health utility values using the EQ-5D-5L (EuroQoL-5 Dimension-5 Level) Questionnaire at baseline, 2 week (± 7 days), and 90 days (+14 days). We will model the prognosis of a cohort of patients receiving rivaroxaban as a baseline against the potential impact of apixaban. The results will be presented as incremental cost per QALY gained, incremental costs per one CRB cases prevented, and incremental cost per one life year saved.
Time frame: For the duration of the study: 3 months
Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios including cost per one CRB case prevented, cost per one life year saved, cost per one quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, which will be analyzed as part of the health economic analysis plan.
Time frame: For the duration of the study: 3 months
Impact of Verbal Consent on Patient Participation in Comparison With Participants From Sites Using Written Informed Consent
Impact of verbal consent on patient participation in comparison with participants from sites using written informed consent. Due to the qualitative nature of this outcome, it will be presented descriptively.
Time frame: For the duration of the study: 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.