The rate of depression increases markedly over the course of adolescence. Adolescents struggling with depression are often set on a maladaptive behavior trajectory which may lead to academic challenges, substance abuse, risky sexual behavior, impairment in relationship building, and suicidality. The S.M.A.R.T Project (Stress Management and Resilience Training for Teens) is designed to learn about mood in teens, and whether emotional well-being can be improved with an 8 week class. The study proposes to refine and test the feasibility of a mindfulness-based self-compassion training program for adolescents who are experiencing subsyndromal depression, comparing it with a "healthy lifestyles" group program as a comparison attention-control for the treatment intervention. Secondarily, the study will explore the impact of these programs on measures of psychopathology and well-being (i.e. depressive symptoms and resilience).
Depressive symptoms are common in adolescents, with 20-25% of adolescents experiencing a depressive episode before they graduate high school, and implications into adulthood. Since depression often first appears in adolescence and unsuccessful treatment of adolescent depression increases the risk of chronic or recurrent depression in adulthood, managing depression symptoms at this critical stage of development can benefit mental health and functioning throughout the lifespan. Preliminary studies have indicated that a mindful self-compassion program is a promising intervention to prevent depression and improve wellbeing in at-risk teens. The S.M.A.R.T Project (Stress Management and Resilience Training for Teens) is designed to learn about mood in teens, and whether emotional well-being can be improved with an 8 week class. In this study, 80 adolescents ages 14-17 ,with subsyndromal depression, will be randomized to either the 8-week mindful self-compassion intervention or the 8-week healthy lifestyles control program, followed by 6 monthly continuation sessions. Feasibility of the research protocol and of the program elements will be assessed. Focus group feedback will also inform program modifications and refinement. Additionally, baseline, mid-intervention, and 3- and 6-months post intervention measurements of depression, resilience, and other related psychosocial measures will allow preliminary exploration of the impact of each program on outcomes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
77
Christine Lathren, MD, MPH
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Time to Incident Depression
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric short form depression 8a: Raw Scores range from 0 - 32, with 0 being the lowest depression rating and 32 the highest depression rating. Analysis utilized t-score transformation with a population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A score of 65 was used to indicate incident depression. The PROMIS measure used in lieu of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ) due to increased measurement frequency. Higher scores indicate a greater level of depression.
Time frame: weekly for up to 36 weeks
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Depression Scores
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric short form depression 8a: Raw Scores range from 0 - 32, with 0 being the lowest depression rating and 32 the highest depression rating. Analysis utilized T-score transformation with a population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Higher scores mean worse depression.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Change in SMFQ Scores
The Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire-Child Version (SMFQ-C) is a measure of the level of depressive symptoms among youth. This analysis utilized the 13-item youth version. Items are symptoms of depression experienced over the past 2 weeks. Each item is scored on a 3-point Likert scale as follows: "True" (0), "Sometimes" (1), and "Not True" (2) with total scores of 0-26. Lower scores at each time point indicate improvement. Higher scores indicate a greater level of depression (worse outcome).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Change in Brief Resiliency Scale (BRS) Scores
.The BRS defines resiliency as the ability to "bounce back" and recover from stress; the items reflect a sense of personal agency. Six items are rated on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Scores are summed and totals divided by the number of questions answered resulting in a mean score of 1-5. Higher scores at each time point indicate increasing resilience.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.