The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the rate of clinically relevant complications associated with CyPass Micro-Stent placement and stability using the CyPass 241-S applier, as determined at 36 months in the postmarket setting, is less than the pre-specified performance target, which is based on experience with the CyPass Model E applier in COMPASS trial TMI-09-01 (NCT01085357).
Each subject's expected participation in the study is up to 37.5 months which includes up to 42 days between the screening and surgery visits, and 36 months of post-surgery follow-up. Only one eye per subject will be implanted.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
79
CyPass System (Model 241-S) consists of the CyPass Micro-Stent contained in a loading device (loader) and the CyPass applier.The CyPass Micro-Stent is an implantable medical device intended for long term use.
Cataract surgery, followed by implantation of the CyPass Micro-Stent in one eye (the study eye) at the surgery visit
Alcon Investigative Site
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Alcon Investigative Site
Orange, California, United States
Percentage of Eyes With Clinically Relevant Complications Associated With CyPass Micro-Stent Placement and Stability as Determined at Month 36
Device-related complications, as specified in the protocol, included: * Failure to implant CyPass, defined as inability to successfully deploy or insert the CyPass. * Clinically significant CyPass malposition, defined as CyPass positioning after deployment such that: * The device is not in the supraciliary space, or * Clinical sequela resulting from device position including, but not limited to: * Secondary surgical intervention to modify device position (eg, repositioning, proximal end trimming or explantation) * Corneal endothelial touch by device * Corneal edema leading to loss of BCDVA \> 2 lines at the last postoperative visit, in comparison with preoperative BCDVA * Progressive ECL, defined as ongoing reduction in endothelial cell count of 30% or more relative to the screening ECD value, where 'ongoing reduction in endothelial cell count' is defined as losses continuing after Visit 5 (6 Month Follow-up).
Time frame: Up to Month 36 postoperative
Mean Change in IOP From Baseline at Month 36
Intraocular pressure (IOP) was assessed by Goldman tonometry and measured in millimeters mercury (mmHg). A negative change value indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 36 postoperative
Percentage of Eyes With IOP Reduction 20 Percent or More From Baseline While Using the Same or Fewer Topical Ocular Hypotensive Medications at Month 36
Intraocular pressure (IOP) was assessed by Goldman tonometry and measured in millimeters mercury (mmHg). A reduction in IOP from baseline indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 36 postoperative
Percentage of Eyes Not Using Ocular Hypotensive Medication With IOP ≥ 6 mmHg and ≤ 18 mmHg at Month 36
Intraocular pressure (IOP) was assessed by Goldman tonometry and measured in millimeters mercury (mmHg). Only one eye per subject was implanted.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Alcon Investigative Site
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
Alcon Investigative Site
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Alcon Investigative Site
Panama City, Florida, United States
Alcon Investigative Site
Gainesville, Georgia, United States
Alcon Investigative Site
Marietta, Georgia, United States
Alcon Investigative Site
Garden City, Kansas, United States
Alcon Investigative Site
Fraser, Michigan, United States
Alcon Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, United States
...and 10 more locations
Time frame: Month 36 postoperative
Percentage of Eyes With Sight-threatening Adverse Events (AEs)
Sight-threatening adverse events, as specified in the protocol, included: * Persistent Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) loss of 3 lines or more * Endophthalmitis * Corneal decompensation * Retinal detachment * Severe choroidal hemorrhage or detachment * Aqueous misdirection. Note: If an eye had multiple occurrences of an AE, the eye is presented only once in the respective eye count column (n) for the corresponding AE.
Time frame: Up to Month 36 postoperative
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Secondary Surgical Interventions (SSI)
A secondary surgical intervention may have occurred for any of the following reasons: * CyPass device explantation associated with CyPass placement and stability * CyPass device explantation NOT associated with CyPass placement and stability * Unplanned ocular surgical reintervention associated with CyPass placement and stability * Unplanned ocular surgical reintervention NOT associated with CyPass placement and stability (as defined in the protocol). Note: If an eye had multiple occurrences of an AE, the eye is presented only once in the respective eye count column (n) for the corresponding AE
Time frame: Up to Month 36 postoperative
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular SSIs Associated With CyPass Placement and Stability
A secondary surgical intervention may have occurred for either of the following reasons: * CyPass device explantation associated with CyPass placement and stability * Unplanned ocular surgical reintervention associated with CyPass placement and stability. Note: If an eye had multiple occurrences of an AE, the eye is presented only once in the respective eye count column (n) for the corresponding AE
Time frame: Up to Month 36 postoperative