This study is a multi-center, randomized clinical trial of women with refractory accidental bowel leakage (ABL) symptoms who have failed to achieve satisfactory symptom control from 2 first-line treatments for ABL: supervised pelvic muscle training (PMT) and constipating medication. The purpose of this study is to compare percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) to a validated sham to determine if PTNS is effective for the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI) in women. The investigators will test the null hypothesis that change from baseline in St. Mark's (Vaizey) score after 12 weeks of stimulation is not significantly different in women with symptomatic ABL receiving PTNS treatments compared to women receiving sham PTNS treatments.
The overarching goal of this randomized clinical trial is to determine if PTNS is more effective than sham PTNS for the treatment of FI in women after 12 weeks of treatment and 1 year after initiating treatment. This is a two-part trial with a Run-In Phase prior to randomization. The trial has the following primary aim: To determine whether the change from baseline in St. Mark's (Vaizey) score in women with symptomatic ABL undergoing PTNS differs from sham after 12 weeks of stimulation. Additional secondary aims include: 1. To compare changes from baseline in self-reported functional outcomes after 12 weekly stimulation sessions in both PTNS and sham groups in Part 1. 2. To determine whether symptom relief amongst study "responders" can be sustained for one year with maintenance treatments in Part II. 3. To determine the impact of completing a bowel diary and receiving education on FI on symptom severity. 4. To determine the ability of the PFDN ABL phone app bowel diary to detect changes from baseline in fecal incontinence episodes recorded to after 12 weeks of stimulation sessions. 5. To determine the association between St. Mark's score and both fat and fiber intake alone and in combination.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
166
The ES-130 device will be used for the indication of "Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence" using the FDA-approved protocol for treatment of urge urinary incontinence (UUI) in the PFDN NOTABLe study. There is no PTNS device cleared by the FDA for the indication of FI treatment; therefore, this is considered an investigational device.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Kaiser Permanente -- Downey
Downey, California, United States
University of California at San Diego, UCSD Women's Pelvic Medicine Center
La Jolla, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente -- San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
Duke University, Duke Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
Durham, North Carolina, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Magee-Women's Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Brown/ Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Center for Women's Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Change From Baseline St. Mark's (Vaizey) Score
The primary outcome measure is the change from baseline in St. Mark's (Vaizey) Score 12 weeks after treatment initiation to compare the outcomes of post-tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) versus sham stimulation. The St. Mark's (Vaizey) score, published in 1999, is commonly used in clinical studies and reports and was based on the Jorge-Wexner score but added two further items for assessment: the use of constipating medication and the presence of fecal urgency. Minimum score is 0 = perfect continence; maximum score is 24 = totally incontinent. Change from baseline is calculated as Week \[4, 8, or 12\] Score minus the score at baseline.
Time frame: 4, 8, and 12 Weeks
Responder to Treatment
Responder status is based on the primary chnage from St. Mark's Score. A responder is defined as any particpant with at least a 4 point reduction in score compared to their baseline score
Time frame: 4, 8, and 12 Weeks
Change From Baseline Number of Fecal Incontinence Events Per Week
Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline, 8, and 12 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of fecal incontinence episodes per week at 8 and 12 weeks and the number of fecal incontinence episodes at baseline.
Time frame: 8 and 12 Weeks
Change From Baseline Number of Urge Fecal Incontinence Events Per Week
Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline, 8, and 12 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of urge fecal incontinence episodes per week at 8 and 12 weeks and the number of urge fecal incontinence episodes at baseline.
Time frame: 8 and 12 Weeks
Change From Baseline Number of Bowel Movements Per Week
Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline, 8, and 12 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of bowel movements per week at 8 and 12 weeks and the number of bowel movements at baseline.
Time frame: 8 and 12 Weeks
Change From Baseline Number of Urge Bowel Movements Per Week
Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline, 8, and 12 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of urge bowel movements per week at 8 and 12 weeks and the number of urge bowel movements at baseline.
Time frame: 8 and 12 Weeks
Change From Baseline Number of Days Without Fecal Incontinence Episodes Per Week
Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline, 8, and 12 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of days without fecal incontinence episodes per week at 8 and 12 weeks and the number of days without fecal incontinence episodes at baseline.
Time frame: 8 and 12 Weeks
50% Improvement in Fecal Incontinence Episodes Per Week
Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline, 8, and 12 weeks, the outcome is calculated as any participant with a 50% reduction in fecal incontinence episodes per week at 8 and 12 weeks compared to the fecal incontinence episodes at baseline
Time frame: 8 and 12 Weeks
75% Improvement in Fecal Incontinence Episodes Per Week
Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline, 8, and 12 weeks, the outcome is calculated as any participant with a 75% reduction in fecal incontinence episodes per week at 8, and 12 weeks compared to the fecal incontinence episodes at baseline.
Time frame: 8 and 12 Weeks
Patient Global Impression-Improvement
The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a patient-reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment, as assessed on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Included here are participants who had improvement as indicated by a rating of 1 (very much better) or 2 (much better)
Time frame: 4, 8, and 12 Weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.