This is a longer-term follow-up study of patients with achromatopsia associated with defects in CNGA3 who participated in a clinical trial in which they received AAV-CNGA3 retinal gene therapy, or of patients with achromatopsia associated with defects in CNGB3 who participated in a clinical trial in which they received AAV-CNGB3 retinal gene therapy.
The follow-up study is designed to collect data on the longer-term safety and efficacy of AAV-CNGA3 retinal gene therapy and AAV-CNGB3 retinal gene therapy.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
34
Participants previously received AAV-CNGA3 or AAV-CNGB3 in an open-label, Phase 1/2 dose escalation trial for adults and children with achromatopsia owing to defects in CNGA3 or CNGB3, respectively.
Kellogg Eye Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom
Incidence of Adverse Events Related to the Treatment
The primary outcome measure is the longer-term safety of treatment with AAV-CNGA3 or AAV-CNGB3, assessed by the absence of IMP-related adverse events.
Time frame: 5 Years
Improvements in Visual Function as Assessed by Visual Acuity at Month 12
Change from baseline to Month 12 in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart letter score in the treated eye. The direction of improvement from baseline is an increase in the number of ETDRS letters read over time.
Time frame: 12 months
Improvements in Visual Function as Assessed by Visual Acuity at Month 60
Change from baseline to Month 60 in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart letter score in the treated eye. The direction of improvement from baseline is an increase in the number of ETDRS letters read over time.
Time frame: 60 months
Improvements in Retinal Function as Assessed by Static Perimetry at Month 12
Change from baseline to Month 12 in contrast sensitivity in the treated eye. The direction of improvement is an increase in sensitivity.
Time frame: 12 months
Improvements in Retinal Function as Assessed by Static Perimetry at Month 60
Change from baseline to Month 60 in contrast sensitivity in the treated eye. The direction of improvement is an increase in sensitivity.
Time frame: 60 months
Quality of Life at Month 12 Measured by QoL Questionnaires in Children and Adolescents
Change from baseline to Month 12 in EuroQol-5D-Y Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) in children and adolescents. EQ-VAS uses a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state. A positive change from baseline reflects improvement, and a negative change from baseline reflects worsening.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 12 months
Quality of Life at Month 60 Measured by QoL Questionnaires in Children and Adolescents
Change from baseline to Month 60 in EuroQol-5D-Y Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) in children and adolescents. EQ-VAS uses a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state. A positive change from baseline reflects improvement, and a negative change from baseline reflects worsening.
Time frame: 60 months
Quality of Life at Month 12 Measured by QoL Questionnaires in Adults
Change from baseline to Month 12 in EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) in adults. EQ-VAS uses a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state. A positive change from baseline reflects improvement, and a negative change from baseline reflects worsening.
Time frame: 12 months
Quality of Life at Month 60 Measured by QoL Questionnaires in Adults
Change from baseline to Month 60 in EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) in adults. EQ-VAS uses a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state. A positive change from baseline reflects improvement, and a negative change from baseline reflects worsening.
Time frame: 60 months