The objective of this registry is to gather data on the clinical outcomes of Medtronic mitral repair products (Profile 3D™ and CG Future® annuloplasty systems) in the approved intended use up to 12 months from the day of procedure
There is limited local evidence on mitral repair products in South Asia and a prospective post market registry will provide real world data on clinical outcomes. Patients suffering from mitral valve disease and indicated for a mitral valve repair procedure with Profile 3D™ and CG Future® annuloplasty system as part of standard of care, in accordance with the product label indications (instructions for use), contraindications, and warnings will be considered for study participation. PRESERVE-Mitral Registry is a prospective non-randomized, non-interventional, post-market registry The objective of this registry is to gather data on the clinical outcomes of Medtronic mitral repair products (Profile 3D™ and CG Future® annuloplasty systems) in the approved intended use up to 12 months from the day of procedure This clinical trial information was submitted voluntarily under the applicable law and, therefore, certain submission deadlines may not apply. (That is, clinical trial information for this applicable clinical trail was submitted under section 402(j)(4)(A) of the Public Health Service Act and 42CFR 11.60 and is not subject to the deadlines established by sections 402(j)(2) and (3) of the Public Heath Service Act or 42 CRF 11.24 and 11.44.)
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
200
Patients suffering from mitral valve disease and indicated for a mitral valve repair procedure with Profile 3D™ and CG Future® annuloplasty system as part of standard of care, in accordance with the product label indications (instructions for use), contraindications, and warnings
National Heart Foundation Hospital & Research Institute
Dhaka, Bangladesh
U. N. Mehta Institute of Cardiology and Research Centre
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
SAL Hospital & Medical Institute
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
Improvement in Mitral Regurgitation (MR) Grade at 12-months Post Procedure
This is determined by assessing the level of mitral valve regurgitation using echo, in subjects at 12-months post-procedure compared to the level at baseline. The levels of regurgitation, level 0-4, correspond to the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines ranging from no MR, Mild MR, Moderate MR, Moderate- to-Severe MR and Severe MR. A percentage number is calculated to reflect how many participants had an MR improvement.
Time frame: 12 months
All Cause Mortality
All deaths occurring from any cause 12-months post procedure
Time frame: 12 months
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in MR Grade at Discharge and First Follow-up (3-6 Months)
This was determined by assessing the level of mitral valve regurgitation using hemodynamic performance, in subjects at discharge and 3-6 months post-procedure compared to the level at baseline. The levels of regurgitation, level 0-4, correspond to the ASE guidelines ranging from no MR, Mild MR, Moderate MR, Moderate-to-Severe MR and Severe MR
Time frame: At discharge from hospital (up to 7 days) and at first follow-up (3-6month)
Improvement in NYHA Functional Class at Discharge, First Follow-up (3-6 Months) and Second Follow-up (12-months) Compared to Baseline.
The percentage of subjects with an improved New York Heart Association NYHA functional class using a two-sided 95% exact binomial confidence internal measured at discharge, 3-6 months, and 12-months post-procedure and compared to baseline.
Time frame: At discharge from hospital (up to 7 days), at first follow-up (3-6months), and at the second follow-up (12 months)
Hospitalization for Heart Failure at 6 Months and at 12 Months Post Procedure
Subjects who have a non-elective hospital admission for signs and symptoms related to heart failure that results in a one night stay (i.e., where the admission date and the discharge date differ by at least one calendar day)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
EPIC Hospital
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences & Research
Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Narayana Institute of Cardiac Sciences
Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center
Kochi, Kerala, India
P.D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
The Madras Medical Mission
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
G. Kuppuswamy Memorial Hospital
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
...and 2 more locations
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months post procedure
Mitral Valve Re-intervention at Discharge, 6 Months and at 12 Months Post Procedure
Subject leaving the operating theater with an implanted Profile 3DTM or CG Future® annuloplasty system and later undergo any surgical or percutaneous interventional catheter procedure that repairs, otherwise alters or adjusts, or replaces the previously implanted annuloplasty system is considered a reoperation
Time frame: At discharge from hospital (up to 7 days), at first follow-up (3-6months), and at the second follow-up (12 months)
Stroke at 6 Months and at 12 Months Post Procedure
Subjects had an acute episode of focal or global neurological dysfunction caused by brain, spinal cord, or retinal vascular injury as a result of hemorrhage or infarction, where the neurological dysfunction lasts for greater than 24-hours
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months post procedure
New Onset of Atrial Fibrillation, as Evaluated Through Follow up ECG at Discharge, First Follow up (3-6months) and at Second Follow up (12 Months)
New onset of AF is defined as when the subject did not present with prior history of AF at baseline nor was AF detected at baseline visit, but AF did manifest post procedure and was either diagnosed during the study visits (discharge, 3-6 months or 12 months visit) or was otherwise diagnosed during the duration of subject participation in the study. The incidence of new onset AF will be evaluated at discharge, first follow up (3-6 months) and at second follow up (12 months). This endpoint is analyzed for the Successfully Implanted (IMP) cohort and provided as a Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Time frame: At discharge from hospital, (up to 7 days), at first follow-up (3-6month), and at the second follow-up (12 months)
Number of Attempts Required for Procedural Success
Number of surgical attempts required for procedural implant success
Time frame: Procedure (defined as the date of the first attempted procedure through subject leaving the operating theater with an implanted Profile 3D or CG Future annuloplasty system)
Total Bypass Time During the Implant Procedure
Total time a subject is on bypass time as a measure of procedural complexity
Time frame: During the procedure as measured by standard operating procedures at the sites