The aim of the PRECOG study is to determine in a prospective interventional randomized study whether the implementation of a predictive test based on the sFLT-1/PlGF ratio improves perinatal care and reduces costs, in patients with suspected preeclampsia before 35 weeks of gestation.
Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy associated with placental insufficiency and is one of the major important of prematurity and maternal mortality worldwide. It complicates 2 to 7% of pregnancies. It is currently considered that preeclampsia is associated with maternal endothelial dysfunction induced by the release into the maternal circulation of excess placental factors (such as sFLT-1 a soluble receptor for VEGF and PlGF). There is currently no curative treatment, and only childbirth and delivery of the placenta alleviate the mother's symptoms. Moreover, the evolution from case with mild symptoms to a severe case of preeclampsia is often is often rapid and difficult to anticipate. Therefore, it is recommended to manage patients with preeclampsia in hospital and cases of suspected preeclampsia are usually admitted in prenatal units. Each year thousands of patients are hospitalized for surveillance and blood/urine analysis to rule out the diagnosis of preeclampsia. A biological test to predict preeclampsia would therefore be of particular interest in order to: * identify patients without preeclampsia and therefore void costs and iatrogenic complications related to unnecessary hospitalization * identify patients at high risk of maternal and perinatal complications in order to anticipate in utero transfer, optimize maternal and fetal surveillance and administrate steroids. It has recently been demonstrated that sFLT-1 and PlGF have a high predictive value for the diagnosis and the prediction of preeclampsia, but the interest of introducing these markers in clinical practice has not been demonstrated yet. The diagnostic and predictive value of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in patients at risk of placenta-related disorders has been shown in the recent literature and estimation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio has become an additional tool in the management of these disorders, primarily PE. This ratio can distinguish the patients that develop maternal or perinatal complications in the next 7-14 days from those with uncomplicated pregnancy. Women with an sFlt-1/PlGF ratio\<38 do not have PE at the time of the test and in all likelihood will not develop PE for at least 1week; it is thereby of great value for reassuring the clinician and the patient. Up to 80% of patients are supposed to be in this patient group; therefore, clinicians are able to exclude the majority of patients and focus on those who need more attention and care. On contrary women with a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio \> 38 and more specifically those with a ratio over 85 are highly likely to develop preeclampsia and should be managed according to local practice/guidelines. Thus the use of such predictive tool appear very promising but its interest has not been demonstrated in prospective intervention studies. The aim of the PRECOG study is to determine in a prospective interventional randomized study whether the implementation of a predictive test based on the sFLT-1/PlGF ratio improves perinatal care and reduces costs, in patients with suspected preeclampsia before 35 WG. costs, in patients with suspected preeclampsia before 35 WG.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
84
* Ambulatory management if sFlt-1 / PlGF ratio is below 38 * usual management if sFlt-1/PlGF is between 38 and 85. * If the ratio is \> 85, monitoring will be intensified and patient hospitalization will be continued
CHU Cochin, Maternité Port Royal
Paris, France
number of patients hospitalised for more than 24 hours
Duration in hours, from admission to discharge from hospital at initial hospitalisation
Time frame: up to 12 weeks
Maternal and fetal morbidity
severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, Disseminated intravascular coagulation, abruptio placenta, delivery before 34 WA, IUGR\< 3°P, Fetal death
Time frame: up to 13 weeks
Maternal morbidity
High blood pressure, preeclampsia, caesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage\> 500 ml
Time frame: up to 13 weeks
Severe Maternal morbidity (Composite outcome )
eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, Disseminated intravascular coagulation, Abruption placenta
Time frame: up to 13 weeks
Number of days between randomisation and delivery
Number of days between randomisation and delivery
Time frame: up to 12 weeks
Mode of delivery
Cesarean, vaginal delivery
Time frame: At delivery
Gestational age
Gestational age at delivery
Time frame: at delivery
Birth weight centile
Centile of birth weight
Time frame: At delivery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Fetal death
Fetal death diagnosed at ultrasound before delivery
Time frame: up to 13 weeks
Prematurity before 37 WG
Delivery before 37 WG + 0 days
Time frame: up to 13 weeks
Prematurity before 34 WG
Delivery before 34 WG + 0 days
Time frame: Delivery
Prematurity before 32 WG
Delivery before 32 WG + 0 days
Time frame: Delivery
Perinatal morbidity (Composite outcome)
prematurity, birth weight \<10 ° P
Time frame: At delivery
Severe Perinatal morbidity (Composite outcome)
perinatal mortality, prematurity \<34 SA, birth weight \<3 ° P
Time frame: At delivery
Costs
direct costs of prenatal care, direct costs of neonatal care, total costs
Time frame: up to 14 weeks
Satisfaction form
Satisfaction concerning the management of pregnancy and duration of hospitalisation
Time frame: Day 3 after delivery