This study was designed as a multicentric prospective clinical trial to assess the clinical, biological and patient's perceived success of new wedge-shaped dental implants inserted in narrow ridges.
Due to the loss of dental elements, the bone crest undergoes a significant remodeling. Bone resorption begins immediately after dental extraction with a 40-60% reduction in horizontal and vertical direction of the alveolar ridge during the first 2 years. The most significant bone loss after tooth extraction occurs within the first 3 months, although modeling and remodeling of the alveoli have a great variability of time: bone structure and organization may not be complete even 24 weeks after dental extraction. It is now known that crestal remodeling is closely related to the disappearance of the bundle bone, which is more representative of the buccal appearance of the alveolus. Its disappearance, especially in thin periodontal biotopes, can lead to significant recessions of hard and soft tissues. Moreover, with a variable percentage, in many patients, crestal resorption continues over time due to a combination of factors involved: anatomical, metabolic and mechanical. Among these, the use of removable total or partial dentures can play an important role in accelerating the resurfacing process. With these premises, it is common to find patients with atrophic crests when processing plans that provide implant support prosthetic rehabilitation. A crestal bone thickness of at least 6 mm in the buco-lingual sense is considered sufficient to safely place a plant with a diameter of 4 mm. But when the width is lower, a variety of procedures and techniques have been proposed in literature that allow recreate the volumes needed for implant placement. Horizontal lifting techniques with bone blocks (autologous, alloplastic, xeno-graft), guided bone regeneration, crest expansion technique have demonstrated a good long-term predictability of the inserted devices. However, some negatives related to these techniques need to be considered, such as increased morbidity for the patient, demand for advanced surgical skills for the operator, increased treatment costs, and increased therapy times. Because of these observations, a new implant design has been proposed for specific use in narrow ridges. Its wedge shape and press-fit insertion make it possible to position it with a minimally invasive preparation of the implant site, performed with ultrasound technique. Therefore, the use of this implant could allow effective and minimally invasive treatment of narrow edentulous crests up to 4 mm, with significant benefits to the patient in terms of morbidity, treatment costs and time. Twelve clinical centers will treat patients with insertion of wedge-shaped implants in thin crests with a specific surgical protocol and clinical outcomes will be collected and analyzed. The chosen medical device will be the Rex Tissue Level implant System. For each implant inserted, the clinical parameters will be recorded up to 5 years after insertion. In addition, intermediate evaluations will be carried out at 1 year and 3 years after installation.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
44
Narrow dental implants inserted in narrow ridges
Piezosurgery Academy
Parma, PR, Italy
implant survival rate
health of the inserted implants
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
surgical procedure evaluation
handling assessment of the implant system by the surgeons
Time frame: during surgery
surgical procedure evaluation
assessment of the invasivity of the surgical procedure from the patient
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
implant stability 14
resonance frequence analysis of the implant
Time frame: 14 days after surgery
implant stability 1 month
resonance frequence analysis of the implant
Time frame: 1 month after surgery
implant stability 2 months
resonance frequence analysis of the implant
Time frame: 2 months after surgery
implant stability 3 months
resonance frequence analysis of the implant
Time frame: 3 months after surgery
implant stability 4 months
resonance frequence analysis of the implant
Time frame: 4 months after surgery
implant stability 5 months
resonance frequence analysis of the implant
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 5 months after surgery
implant stability 6 months
resonance frequence analysis of the implant
Time frame: 6 months after surgery
implant stability 1 year
resonance frequence analysis of the implant
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
implant stability 3 years
resonance frequence analysis of the implant
Time frame: 3 years after surgery
implant stability 5 years
resonance frequence analysis of the implant
Time frame: 5 years after surgery