This study is testing whether stratification of the patients according to biological risk factors for different treatment groups will improve the outcome of patients with clinically high diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
For young clinically high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients the optimal therapy has not been established. Previous Nordic phase II studies, where dose-dense chemoimmunotherapy (R-CHOEP-14) with systemic CNS prophylaxis (HD-Mtx and HD-AraC) was given, demonstrated favorable outcome in comparison to historical controls. However, the patients with biological risk factors, such as translocation of bcl2 and myc oncogenes or and/or high BCL2 and MYC expression or deletion 17p and/or high P53 expression had significantly higher risk of death, as compared to patients without aberrations. The figures provide evidence for an unmet clinical need for the patients with biological risk factors, and underscore the importance of a clinical trial, where both biological and clinical risk factors play a role in the treatment planning. In this trial treatment intensity varies according to presence or absence of biological risk factors. All patients receive a prephase medication consisting of prednisone and vincristine and two cycles of R-CHOP and high dose (HD) methotrexate. Subsequently, depending on the biological risk factors either four additional cycles of R-CHOEP (standard arm with no risk factors) or four dose adjusted R-EPOCH courses (experimental arm with risk factors) are given, followed by one course of high dose cytarabine (Ara-C) and R. R-CHOEP courses should be given with a two-week and R-EPOCH with a three-week interval.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
120
rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine, prednisone
dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, rituximab
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, Denmark
Dept of Haematology, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
Dept of Haematology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen
Time to treatment failure (TTF) of the patients with biological risk factors
Interval between the registration date and the date of documented progression or lack of response, first relapse, death for any reason or discontinuation/change of therapy because of toxicity, whichever occurs first. Otherwise, patients will be censored at the last date they were known to be alive. For patients not responding at any time point on study treatment, TTF is defined as one day.
Time frame: At 3 years
Time to treatment failure (TTF) at 3 years from date of registration of all patients and the patients in the low risk group
Interval between the registration date and the date of documented progression or lack of response, first relapse, death for any reason or discontinuation/change of therapy because of toxicity, whichever occurs first. Otherwise, patients will be censored at the last date they were known to be alive. For patients not responding at any time point on study treatment, TTF is defined as one day.
Time frame: At 3 years
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (Safety and tolerability)
Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events graded according to the NCI CTCAE v 4.03
Time frame: During the treatment period at the end of each cycle (14 or 21 days) up to 6 months. In addition, severe late toxicities during follow-up at 6 months intervals through study completion, an average of 5.5 years.
Clinical response rate of all patients and the patients with biological risk factors
Number of patients with complete or partial response
Time frame: At the end of treatment cycles 2 and 7. Each cycle is two (group A) or three weeks (group B)
CNS relapse rate
Number of patients with CNS progression
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Herlev, Denmark
Dept haematology, Odense University hospital
Odense, Denmark
Dept of Haematology, Sjaellands University hospital, Roskilde
Roskilde, Denmark
Helsinki University Hospital Cancer Centre
Helsinki, Finland
Keski-Suomen keskussairaala
Jyväskylä, Finland
Kuopio University Hospital
Kuopio, Finland
TAYS
Tampere, Finland
Turku University Hospital, Syöpäklinikka
Turku, Finland
...and 6 more locations
Time frame: At 1,5 years
Progression free survival rate (PFS) of all patients and the patients with biological risk factors
Time frame: At 3 years
Overall survival rate (OS) of all patients and the patients with biological risk factors
Time frame: At 3 years
Molecular correlates for survival
Identification of genomic aberrations (for example mutations and translocations), gene expression profiles and protein expression from the tumor tissue and circulation that predict clinical course of the disease
Time frame: At 3 years