To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Neihulizumab (ALTB-168) administered intravenously in patients with moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis who are refractory or intolerant to anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor α and/or anti-integrin treatments.
This is a Phase II, open label, single arm, multiple dose proof of principle study to test the efficacy and safety of Neihulizumab in patients with moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis and who has failed or are intolerant to anti-TNFα and/or anti-integrin therapy. A minimum of 30 patients and a maximum of 40 will be recruited in 1 dosing group. For efficacy evaluation, the primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with clinical response, defined as ≥ 3- point reduction in MCS, a 30% or greater decrease from the baseline score, and with a 1-point or greater decrease of the rectal bleeding subscore or an absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1 at Week 12. Safety assessments will consist of evaluating physical examination, vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, body temperature and oxygen saturation), safety laboratory tests, adverse events and tolerability.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
24
monoclonal antibody
Lynn Institute of the Ozarks
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Stomach Doctor - Surinder Saini, MD - Fountain Valley
Newport Beach, California, United States
Wellness Clinical Research (WCR)
Hialeah, Florida, United States
The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Response at Week 12
The clinical response is defined as a ≥ 3-point reduction in Mayo Clinic Score, a 30% or greater decrease from the baseline score, and with a 1-point or greater decrease of the rectal bleeding subscore or an absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1, The colonic site with maximum inflammation was determined by Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) defined as follows: normal (0 points); erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability (1 point); absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions (2 points); and spontaneous bleeding or ulceration (3 points). Lower score means disease improvement.
Time frame: week 12
The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Response (mITT)
The proportion of patients with clinical response defined as a ≥2-point decrease in partial MCS (pMCS), and with a 1 point or greater decrease of the rectal bleeding subscale or an absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1. The colonic site with maximum inflammation was determined by Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) defined as follows: normal (0 points); erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability (1 point); absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions (2 points); and spontaneous bleeding or ulceration (3 points). Lower score means disease improvement.
Time frame: weeks 6,16, 20 and 26
The Proportion of Patients With Clinical Remission
The number of patients with clinical remission, defined as MCS of 2 or lower (or pMCS of 1 or lower) and no subscore higher than 1. The colonic site with maximum inflammation was determined by Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) defined as follows: normal (0 points); erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability (1 point); absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions (2 points); and spontaneous bleeding or ulceration (3 points). Lower score means disease improvement.
Time frame: weeks 6,16, 20 and 26
Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Subscore Changes From Baseline
The mean (SD) observed flexible sigmoidoscopy subscore change from baseline (CFB). Baseline is defined as the last available assessment prior to the first administration of the study drug. The sigmoidoscopic improvement is defined as any decrease in Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) endoscopic subscore, at Weeks 12 and 26. MCS range is 1-3. The colonic site with maximum inflammation was determined by Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) defined as follows: normal (0 points); erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability (1 point); absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions (2 points); and spontaneous bleeding or ulceration (3 points). Lower score means disease improvement.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Wellness Clinical Research (WCR)
Lake Wales, Florida, United States
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Capitol Research
Rockville, Maryland, United States
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, United States
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
...and 2 more locations
Time frame: Baseline, week 12- and week 26 after the first treatment
The Number of Patients With Mucosal Healing
The mucosal healing is defined as an absolute subscore for endoscopy of 0 or 1 The colonic site with maximum inflammation was determined by Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) defined as follows: normal (0 points); erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability (1 point); absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions (2 points); and spontaneous bleeding or ulceration (3 points). Lower score means disease improvement.
Time frame: at 12- and 26-week after the first treatment
Change of Histological Activity Grade From Baseline Using the Geboes System
The number of patients with histological activity Geboes Score ≤ 3.1 (worst of both rectum and sigmoid colon). The original Geboes grade system is from Grade 0 to Grade 5. The following are the grades: Grade 0: Architectural changes Grade 1: Chronic inflammatory infiltrate Grade 2A: Eosinophils in lamina propria Grade 2B: Neutrophils in lamina propria Grade 3: Neutrophils in epithelium Grade 4:Crypt destruction Grade 5: Erosions and ulcerations
Time frame: at 12- and 26-week after the first treatment
The Number of Patients With Histological Healing
The histological healing is defined as histological grade = 0
Time frame: at 12- and 26-week after the first treatment
Change of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score From Baseline
Number of Participants with a Clinically Significant Difference in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score From Baseline, to Week 12 and Week 26. The IBDQ is a questionnaire used for an assessment of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in patients with the Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). The IBDQ has a possible score range of 32 (minimum) to 224 (maximum), where a higher score indicates better HRQoL. A difference of 16 points from Baseline Assessment (Baseline Score) to Week 12, and Baseline Assessment (Baseline Score) to Week 26, is considered clinically significant. The outcome measure is assessed by comparing each patient's change in individual IBDQ score from Baseline to Week 12, and from Baseline to Week 26. Patients who achieved the 16 point difference (improvement of the IBDQ score from the baseline indicating the Clinically Significant Difference) are included as responders to the treatment.
Time frame: at 12- and 26-week after the first treatment
The Number of Patients With Inflammatory IBDQ Response
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) has a possible score range of 32 (minimum) to 224 (maximum), where a higher score indicates better Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). A difference of 16 points from Baseline to Week 12 and Baseline to Week 26, is considered clinically significant. The outcome measure will be assessed by comparing each patient's change in individual IBDQ score from Baseline to Week 12, and from Baseline to Week 26, to assess whether a response was seen.
Time frame: at 12- and 26-week after the first treatment