The majority of the over one million annual AHF hospitalizations originate from the emergency department. Admitting and re-admitting lower risk AHF patients who don't need prolonged hospitalization may increase their risk for poor outcomes and decrease their quality of life: Safe alternatives to hospitalization from the ED are needed. We propose a strategy-of-care, short stay unit management of AHF (i.e. less than 24 hours), will lead to improved outcomes for lower risk AHF patients.
Nearly 85% of acute heart failure (AHF) patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute heart failure (AHF) are hospitalized. Once hospitalized, within 30 days post-discharge, 27% of patients are re-hospitalized or die. Attempts to improve outcomes with novel therapies have all failed. The evidence for existing AHF therapies are poor: No currently used AHF treatment is known to improve outcomes. ED treatment is largely the same today as 40 years ago. Hospitalizing patients who don't need it may contribute to adverse outcomes. Hospitalization is not benign; patients enter a vulnerable phase post-discharge, at increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Patients would prefer to be home, not hospitalized. Furthermore, hospitalization and re-hospitalization for AHF predominantly affects patients of lower socioeconomic status (SES). Avoiding hospitalization in patients who don't need it may improve outcomes and quality of life, while reducing costs. Short stay unit (SSU: less than 24 hours) management of AHF is effective for lower risk patients. However, it's only been studied in small studies or retrospective analyses. In addition, some have considered the SSU 'cheating' for hospitals trying to avoid 30 day readmission penalties, since SSU or observation didn't count as an admission. However, this quality measure is now changing. A robust clinical effectiveness trial would demonstrate the effectiveness of this patient-centered strategy. Using a multi-center, randomized controlled design, this clinical effectiveness trial will test whether Short Stay Unit AHF management for \< 24 hours increases days-alive-and-out-of-hospital, Quality of Life assessment (QoL), caregiver burden, and costs compared to inpatient management.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
194
Subjects will be treated for acute heart failure in the SSU and observed for improvement then, if appropriate, discharged. If not appropriate for discharge they will be admitted to inpatient.
Subjects who come to the ER with acute heart failure who are randomized to inpatient stay.
University of Alabama - Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Days Alive and Out of Hospital
To demonstrate the effectiveness of a SSU AHF management strategy vs standard of care
Time frame: 30 day outcome
Quality of Life as Measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
To determine quality of life using a heart failure questionnaire. We used the Short KCCQ, and the overall summary KCCQ score. The score ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best possible score. Differences of 5 or more points are considered clinically significant.
Time frame: 30 day outcome
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Beaumont Health System
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Wake Forest School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Allegheny Health Network
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
...and 1 more locations