Upon successful screening and registration, enrollment to a cohort will begin. If DLT criteria are exceeded in a cohort, that cohort will close and will not proceed to Phase 2 of the study. Provided the safety of a cohort is established, enrollment will continue. Within BCG-containing cohorts, treatment will begin at full-dose BCG. If DLT criteria are exceeded with full-dose BCG, a one level dose reduction of BCG will be implemented. If DLT criteria are exceeded with reduced-dose BCG, the BCG-containing cohort will not proceed to Phase 2 of the study Phase 1 Cohorts: * Durvalumab Monotherapy (cohort 1); ENROLLMENT COMPLETE * Durvalumab plus BCG (cohort 2); ENROLLMENT COMPLETE * Durvalumab plus External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) (cohort 3); ENROLLMENT COMPLETE * Durvalumab plus Intravesical Gemcitabine plus Intravesical Docetaxel (cohort 4); ENROLLMENT COMPLETE * Durvalumab plus Tremelimumab plus Intravesical Gemcitabine plus Intravesical Docetaxel (cohort 5); ENROLLMENT DID NOT OCCUR * Intravesical N-803NAI plus Intravesical Gemcitabine (cohort 6) * Intravesical N-803NAI plus Intravesical Gemcitabine plus Intravesical Docetaxel (cohort 7) * Subcutaneous N-803NAI plus Intravesical N-803NAI plus Intravesical Gemcitabine plus Intravesical Docetaxel (cohort 8) If any of the combination regimen cohorts establishes a RP2D in Phase 1 of the study, enrollment to Phase 2 of the study may proceed within the individual phase 2 expansion cohorts defined by patient BCG exposure history. Upon successful screening and registration, Phase 2 subjects will be assigned to one of the treatment arms. Assignment will occur amongst the arms that are open to accrual at the time of subject registration. Phase 2 subjects will be administered treatment at the RP2D's established for each regimen within Phase 1 of the study. However, within BCG-containing cohorts, the BCG dose will be reduced to Dose level -1 (1/3rd-dose BCG) even if the RP2D established in the Phase 1 of the study was full-dose BCG. The rationale for this stems from ongoing global BCG supply shortages that have arisen since the launch of the trial and multiple prior clinical trials demonstrating similar efficacy with decreased toxicity when reduced-dose BCG regimens are utilized compared to full-dose BCG therapy. This modification was deemed necessary to facilitate continued enrollment to the study while not sacrificing clinical efficacy or safety. This modification also aligns with recent AUA consensus guidelines on BCG dosing during BCG shortages. It is anticipated that individual treatment cohorts will be closed and added during the conduct of the study as cohorts complete accrual, individual cohort safety data is analyzed, and new cohorts are added. Enrollment to Phase 2 cohorts will not begin until at least one cohort has successfully established a RP2D in the Phase 1 portion of the study and deemed safe to proceed to the Phase 2 portion of the trial.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
186
Durvalumab 1120 mg intravenously Day 1 every 21 days x 8 cycles.
EBRT 6 Gy x 3; Cycle 1 Day 1, 3, and 5
Dose level 0 (starting dose) = Full-dose Dose level-1 = 1/3rd-dose BCG. Dose level -1 is expected to be utilized during the phase II portion of the study due to the ongoing and persistent shortage of BCG in the US.
Gemcitabine 1000 mg intravesical weekly (+/- 2 days) x 6 doses
Docetaxel 37.5 mg intravesical weekly (+/- 2 days) x 6 doses.
Tremelimumab 75 mg intravenously Day 1 (+/- 2 days) every 28 days x 4 cycles.
Durvalumab 1500 mg intravenously Day 1 (+/- 2 days) every 28 days x 6 cycles.
Other regimens to be determined
For all cohorts containing intravesical NAI treatment, starting in Week 1, induction intravesical NAI 400 ug will be administered weekly x 6 doses via a foley catheter into an empty bladder and maintained in the bladder for 60 minutes.
For all cohorts containing subcutaneous NAI treatment, starting in Week 1, NAI 10 ug/kg will be administered biweekly for 3 doses via subcutaneous injection.
BCG Oncology
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Johns Hopkins University: Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Phase 1: Determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) from BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)
Determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) from BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with each of the following immunotherapy study regimens: Durvalumab (cohort 1) Durvalumab + intravesical BCG (cohort 2) Durvalumab + radiation (cohort 3) Durvalumab + intravesical Gemcitabine + intravesical Docetaxel (cohort 4) Durvalumab + Tremelimumab + intravesical Gemcitabine + intravesical Docetaxel (cohort 5) Intravesical NAI + intravesical Gemcitabine (cohort 6) Intravesical NAI + intravesical Gemcitabine + intravesical Docetaxel (cohort 7) Subcutaneous NAI + intravesical NAI + intravesical Gemcitabine + intravesical Docetaxel (cohort 8) The RP2D of each immunotherapy study arm is defined as the dose level at which \< 2 out of 6, \< 4 out of 9, or \< 5 out of 12 patients enrolled within an individual study arm experience dose-limiting toxicity.
Time frame: 6 months
Phase 2: Determine the complete response rate within individual phase 2 expansion cohorts of BCG-unresponsive, BCG-relapsing/persistent, and high-risk BCG-naïve NMIBC subjects treated with each study regimen
The complete response rate within each study arm is defined as the proportion of patients within each arm that demonstrate no evidence of recurrent or persistent high grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder of any stage at any post-treatment disease assessment.
Time frame: 6 months
Phase 1: Assess Adverse Events
The safety profile of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC subjects treated within each study regimen will be assessed by NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.03 for Cohorts 1-3 and v5.0 for Cohorts 4-8.
Time frame: 6 months
Phase 1: Characterize the complete response rate of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC subjects treated with each study regimen
The complete response rate within each study arm is defined as the proportion of patients within each arm that demonstrate no evidence of recurrent or persistent high grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder of any stage at any post-treatment disease assessment.
Time frame: 2 years (24 months)
Phase 1: Characterize the 12-month recurrence free survival (RFS) rate of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC subjects treated with each study regimen
The 12-month RFS rate of BCG-unresponsive NMIBC subjects treated within each study regimen is defined as the proportion of patients within each arm with no evidence of recurrent high grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder of any stage at the 12-month post-treatment disease assessment.
Time frame: 12 month
Phase 2: Determine the 12-month RFS rate within individual phase 2 expansion cohorts of BCG-unresponsive, BCG-relapsing/persistent, and high-risk BCG-naive NMIBC subjects treated with each study regimen
The 12-month RFS rate of BCG-unresponsive, BCG-relapsing/persistent, and high-risk BCG-naive NMIBC subjects treated within each arm is defined as the proportion of patients within each arm with no evidence of recurrent high grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder of any stage at the 12-month post-treatment assessment.
Time frame: 12 months
Phase 2: Identify significant associations between complete response rates and 12-month RFS rates and baseline tumor immunohistochemistry staining patterns of PD-L1 and other relevant mechanism of action targets for each study regimen
Associations between complete response rate and 12-month RFS rates will be assessed by baseline tumor immunohistochemistry staining patterns of PD-L1 (assessed by the SP263 PD-L1 antibody) and other relevant mechanism of action targets for each drug.
Time frame: 12 months
Phase 2: Assess Adverse Events
The safety profile within individual phase 2 expansion cohorts of BCG-unresponsive, BCG-relapsing/persistent, and high-risk BCG-naive NMIBC subjects treated within each study arm will be assessed by NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.03 for Cohorts 1-3 and v5.0 for Cohorts 4-8.
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.