Clinical Characterization of Symptomatic Populations

N/ACompletedNCT03319212

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.105 enrolled

Overview

This is an unmasked, non-randomized, single arm, stratified, dispensing investigation of symptomatic and asymptomatic subject populations. Subjects will be assigned to a single study lens type to be worn bilaterally for approximately 4 weeks followed by no contact lens wear for 1 week.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Enrollment

105

Conditions

Ametropia

Interventions

senofilcon A contact lensesDEVICE

Senofilcon A Daily Disposable Contact Lenses

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 55 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study: 1. The subject must read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form. 2. Appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol. 3. Between 18 and 55 (inclusive) years of age at the time of screening. 4. Be a current soft contact lens wearer in both eyes with a minimum of 3 days/week wear time over the last 1 month by self-report. 5. Have a baseline CLDEQ-8 score of either: 1. 7 or lower 2. 15 or greater 6. Subjects must possess a functional / usable pair of spectacles and bring them to the visit (only if applicable - to the investigators discretion). 7. Subjects must pass a pre-screening questionnaire. 8. Subjects must be willing to discontinue all contact lens wear for approximately 1 week/ 9. Subjects must present to visit 1 with their habitual lenses on eye for at least 6 hours. Exclusion Criteria: * Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study: 1. Currently pregnant or lactating, by self-report. 2. Any ocular or systemic allergies, disease or use of medication which may interfere with contact lens wear (at the discretion of the investigator). 3. Any active ocular abnormalities/conditions that may interfere with contact lens wear (at the discretion of the investigator). 4. Any infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or a contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV), by self-report. 5. Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear. 6. Habitual contact lens wear modality as extended wear (≥1 night per month of extended wear). 7. Habitual contact lens is rigid gas permeable, toric, monovision or multi-focal 8. Any previous, or planned (during the course of the study) ocular surgery (e.g., radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.) 9. Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 2 weeks prior to study enrollment. 10. Employee or employee's immediate family member of clinical site (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician). 11. Current habitual use of Restasis, Xiidra, ocular steroids, or any medication (RX or OTC) that may interfere with contact lens wear (at the discretion of the investigator).

Locations (2)

VRC-East

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

University of Waterloo Center for Contact Lens Research

Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Meibomian Gland Imaging

Meibomian gland imaging was assessed in each each subject eye, at baseline, 4-Week Follow-up (during lens wear) and the the 5-Week Follow-up on subjects' bare eyes. Meibomian gland imaging is expressed interms of area of loss using the following grading scale: Degree 0 ≈ 0%; Degree 1 ≤ 25%; Degree 2 26% - 50%; Degree 3 51% - 75%; Degree 4 ≥ 75%.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Meibomian Gland Expressibility

Meibomian glands were assessed in the three regions of each lower eyelid: temporal, central, and nasal. Approximately five glands are expressed per region with each use of the Meibomian Gland Evaluator. Secretions for each of the 5 glands selected within the three regions were graded using the following secretion grading scale: Grade 0 = No Secretion (Includes capped orifices), Grade 1 = Inspissated (semi-solid, toothpaste-like consistency), Grade 2 = Colored/Cloudy Liquid, Grade 3 = Clear Liquid Oil. The total grades for 5 glands per region was calculated for each subject. The total Meibomian Gland Secretion Score was calculated by adding the grades for the 15 glands assessed. Mean and standard deviation for total grade per region and total Meibomian Gland Secretion Score were reported for each stratum. Total scores range from 0 to 15 were lower score indicate worsening meibomian gland expressability.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Lid Margin Evaluation: Number of Eyes With Abnormal Biomicroscopy Findings

Lid margin evaluation was conducted for upper and lower lids for both left and right eyes. The presence of the following biomicroscopy findings were recorded as No/normal or Yes/abnormal: * Irregularity: Notching of Margin * Vascularity of Lid Margin: Telangiectasia * Meibomian Gland Pouting, Plugging, or Capping * Lid/Lash Margin Debris Findings. The number of positive findings (yes) was reported for each group.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy

Horizontal length of staining and sagittal width of staining were graded for both upper and lower lids for each eye. Average grade was calculated separately for upper and lower lids, and the final grade was calculated as the average grade across upper and lower lids. Mean and standard deviation were reported for the final grade by stratum. Subjects were classified according to their final lid wiper epitheliopathy grade for each eye using the following scale: None = 0, Mild = 0.25 - 1.00, Moderate = 1.25 - 2.00, and Severe = 2.25 - 3.00. Final Grades range from 0 to 3, where higher final grades indicate worsening lid wiper epitheliopathy.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.

Secondary Outcomes

Conjunctival Redness

Limbal and bulbar conjunctival redness were assessed or each quadrant (nasal, temporal, inferior, superior) using the following scale: 0 = Normal, 1 = Trace, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, and 4 = Severe.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Conjunctival Staining

Conjunctival staining was assessed for each eye by quadrant (Superior, Inferior, Nasal, Temporal) utilizing the following scale: Grade 0 = None (No conjunctival staining), Grade 1 = Trace (Scattered superficial punctate staining), Grade 2 = Mild (Regional or generalized punctate staining), Grade 3 = Moderate (Significant coalesced punctate staining), Grade 4 = Severe (Patch staining).

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Corneal Staining

Corneal staining was assessed for each eye by region (Central, Superior, Inferior, Nasal, Temporal). Corneal staining type was evaluated using the following the scale: Grade 0 = None, Grade 1 = Micropunctate, Grade 2 = Macropunctate, Grade 3 = Coalesced Macropunctate, and Grade 4 = Patch (\>1mm). Corneal staining area was evaluated using the following the scale: Grade 0 = 0% of region covered, Grade 1 = 10% of region covered, Grade 2 = 20% of region covered, Grade 3 = 30% of region covered, Grade 4 = 40% of region covered, Grade 5 = 50% of region covered, Grade 6 = 60% of region covered, Grade 7 = 70% of region covered, Grade 8 = 80% of region covered, Grade 9 = 90% of region covered, and Grade 10 = 100% of region covered. The following scale was used in the grading of corneal staining depth: Grade 0 = None, Grade 0 = Superficial epithelial, Grade 2 = Full epithelial, and Grade 3 = Stromal glow.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Tear Film Lipid Layer Thickness

Tear film lipid layer thickness was measured for each eye using LipiView II. The Review Lipid Images screen provided numerical analysis of the measured lipid layer thickness in nanometers (nm) from 10 (thinnest) to 240 (thickest), with a precision of 1 nm and an accuracy of 10 nm.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Tear Film Stability

Non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) was measured for each eye to indicate the stability of the tear film. NIBUT is measured as the time interval in seconds after the final blink to the first appearance of distortion in the reflected rings; or to the time that the participant has to blink due to discomfort. Three measurements were taken on each eye. The average NIBUT was reported for each group.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Tear Film Lipid Pattern

Tear film lipid pattern was recorded for each eye using the following categories: None, Open Meshwork, Closed (Tight Meshwork), Flow (Wave), Amorphous, Colors, and Other.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up