The purpose of this study is to determine whether a home-based cycling program for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is a feasible and acceptable
Lumbar spinal stenosis is a prevalent and disabling condition in elderly individuals. Lumbar spinal stenosis results in lumbar and/or radicular leg pain when standing and walking, while symptoms regress in lumbar flexion positions and at rest. The inability to stand or walk impairs functioning and health-related quality of life of elders, and has an important healthcare cost. The 2 main treatment options for lumbar spinal stenosis are conservative or surgical. Laminectomy may be more effective on pain and function than conservative therapy. However, the benefit-risk balance of surgery should be considered in this population with numerous co-morbidities, and evidence is inconsistent. Therefore, conservative therapy is usually the first line option to avoid or delay surgery. Data regarding exercise therapy are scarce. Lumbar-flexion-based exercises are usually recommended. A pilot study suggested that lumbar-flexion-based endurance training, namely cycling, could be an effective and safe method to improve pain, function and health-related quality of life in elderly patients with chronic low back pain but barriers to adhering to the program were detected. Investigators aim to assess barriers and facilitators to a 3-month home-based cycling program in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
15
A single outpatient supervised session followed by a 3-month home-based cycling program tailored to patients' preferences
Hôpital Cochin -Service de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de l'Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du Rachis
Paris, France
Barriers to home-based cycling
Assessed by a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews
Time frame: 3 months
Facilitators to home-based cycling
Assessed by a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews
Time frame: 3 months
Barriers to home-based cycling
Assessed by a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews
Time frame: Baseline
Facilitators to home-based cycling
Assessed by a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews
Time frame: Baseline
Number of training sessions to assess adherence to home-based cycling
assessed by automatic monitoring on a USB stick connected to the bicycle
Time frame: 3 months
Covered distance to assess adherence to home-based cycling
assessed by automatic monitoring on a USB stick connected to the bicycle
Time frame: 3 months
Duration of training sessions to assess adherence to home-based cycling
Number of training sessions, distance, duration and power assessed by automatic monitoring on a USB stick connected to the bicycle
Time frame: 3 months
Developed power to assess adherence to home-based cycling
assessed by automatic monitoring on a USB stick connected to the bicycle
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 3 months
Burden of a home-based cycling
Assessed by the Exercise Therapy Burden Questionnaire (0=no burden, and 100=maximal burden)
Time frame: 3 months
Mean change from baseline in mean lumbar pain in the past 48 hrs
Assessed by an 11-point numeric rating scale (0=no pan, and 100=maximal pain)
Time frame: 3 months
Mean change from baseline in mean radicular pain in the past 48 hrs
Assessed by an 11-point numeric rating scale (0=no pain, and 100=maximal pain)
Time frame: 3 months
Mean change from baseline in mean disability in the past 48 hrs
Assessed by an 11-point numeric rating scale (0=no disability, and 100=maximal disability)
Time frame: 3 months
Mean change from baseline in mean spine-specific activity limitation
Assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (0=no limitation, and 100=maximal limitation)
Time frame: 3 months
Mean change from baseline in mean maximum walking distance
Assessed by an adapted version of the self-paced walking test
Time frame: 3 months