Since 2009, a programmatic community-based strategy (COPE) has been implemented to address health disparities among Navajo individuals living with multiple chronic conditions. COPE (Community Outreach and Patient Empowerment) targets individual, family, and health system-level factors through four activities: 1) coordination between community health representatives (CHRs) and Indian Health Service providers; 2) CHR competency with standardized training; 3) a culturally-sensitive health promotion curriculum for patients and families; and 4) strong CHR supervision. COPE has been implemented throughout Navajo Nation. Enrollment is programmatic; in other words, the decision to enroll a patient in COPE occurs independently of whether the patient is in this study. Participants receive the COPE intervention in the same manner and intensity, whether they are included in this observational study or not. The main goal of this observational research is to understand if COPE improves the lives of participating community members. The Primary Aim is to assess the impact of the COPE Project on changes in HbA1c and other CVD risk factors. Hypothesis: Patients enrolled in the COPE program will experience a reduction in HbA1c compared to the control group. Secondary aims are: 1) To understand if COPE improves patients' own self-reported outcomes. Hypothesis: COPE patients will report better health compared with their own baseline at 12 months. 2) To Identify factors associated with increased effectiveness of the COPE Project at the individual, community, and health system level using a mixed-model approach. 3) To understand diverse stakeholder perspectives on COPE impact and value among CHRs, providers and the health care system. Hypothesis: Compared with baseline, CHRs will report greater empowerment in their work, providers will report greater confidence in CHRs. The observational cohort will be comprised of individuals with diabetes receiving care at one of the participating health facilities. Cases include individuals participating in the COPE intervention; controls are non-COPE participants identified within the same hospital and matched based on similar baseline characteristics. Study findings will improve clinical and patient-decision making and the health of marginalized AI/ANs by informing policies to promote CHR interventions in rural and underserved communities.
Study population: The study will take place on the Navajo Reservation and within Navajo Area IHS clinical facilities. The Navajo Reservation covers over 27,000 square miles in rural New Mexico and Arizona. The proposed evaluation will occur at the six sites, including two which are currently implementing COPE as well as four sites which will implement COPE in the next two years. The health care centers included in this evaluation represent a mix of federally and tribally operated programs and together provide care for over 200,000 individuals. All sites use a common suite of software applications to record electronic health care data: the IHS RPMS (Resource Patient Management System). Study Design: The research is aligned with PCORI's definition of patient-centered research by answering questions that will allow patients and other stakeholders to make informed health care decisions. This will be completed by incorporating patient input at all stages; comparatively assessing the benefits and weaknesses of COPE; capturing the "voice" of stakeholders through qualitative methods; choosing outcomes that have been cited as relevant to patients' own priorities and decision-making; and studying cross-site variation to capture individual and community factors associated with impact. The study will address the following questions: 1. Do clinical outcomes (hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, cholesterol, and body mass index) improve more among COPE participants, compared with similar patients who do not participate in COPE? 2. Do COPE patients experience improvements in self-rated overall health, quality of life, empowerment and satisfaction compared with similar patients who do not participate in COPE? 3. As COPE is implemented in six different service units across the Navajo Nation, can we identify any factors among patients, CHRs, and hospitals that are "key ingredients" for COPE to be effective? 4. Does COPE benefit the health system and population served from diverse stakeholder perspectives including CHRs, providers, and the local health care delivery system?
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
28,813
Chinle Comprehensive Health Care Facility
Chinle, Arizona, United States
Tsehootsooi Medical Center
Fort Defiance, Arizona, United States
Kayenta Health Center
Kayenta, Arizona, United States
Crownpoint Health Center Facility
Crownpoint, New Mexico, United States
Gallup Indian Medical Center
Gallup, New Mexico, United States
Northern Navajo Medical Center
Shiprock, New Mexico, United States
Change in Percentage of Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Change in Hemoglobin A1c measured at 24 months, compared with baseline
Time frame: 24 months
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure
Changes in systolic blood pressure at 24 months, compared with baseline
Time frame: 24 months
Change in Low-density Lipoprotein
Change in low density lipoprotein at 24 months, compared with baseline
Time frame: 24 months
Change in Body Mass Index
change in body mass index at 24 months, compared with baseline
Time frame: 24 months
Change in Primary Outpatient Services
Primary outpatient encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each clinic visit reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis.
Time frame: 24 months
Change in Specialty Outpatient Services
Specialty outpatient encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each clinic visit reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis.
Time frame: 24 months
Change in Emergency Services
Emergency encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each clinic visit reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis.
Time frame: 24 months
Change in Counseling / Behavioral Services
Counseling / behavioral encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each "clinic visit" reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis.
Time frame: 24 months
Change in Laboratory Services
Laboratory encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each "clinic visit" reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis.
Time frame: 24 months
Change in Radiology Services
Radiology encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each "clinic visit" reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis.
Time frame: 24 months
Change in Pharmacy Services
Pharmacy encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each "clinic visit" reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis.
Time frame: 24 months
Change in Inpatient Services
For inpatient services, the primary data point is the presence of a DRG code indicating the patient was hospitalized. However, we also included clinic listings for labor and delivery and for observation as inpatient utilization.
Time frame: 24 months
Change in Dental Encounters
Dental encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each clinic visit reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis.
Time frame: 24 months
Change in Community Encounters
Community encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. Community Encounters may include public health nursing and community health representative visits; however, not all community encounters (e.g. visits by Community Health Representatives in clinics where Community Health Representatives do not document their visits on the RPMS system) may be represented in this database
Time frame: 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.