The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of SHP465 in children aged 4 to 5 years with ADHD after multiple daily doses of 6.25 milligram (mg) SHP465
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
24
SHP465 capsule will be administered at a dose of 6.25 mg, orally once daily for 4 weeks. SHP465 is comprised of sulfate salts of dextroamphetamine and amphetamine, with dextroamphetamine saccharate and amphetamine aspartate monohydrate, which provide a composite enantiomer ratio of 3:1 d-amphetamine to l-amphetamine.
Preferred Research Partners
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Clinical Neuroscience Solutions Inc
Orlando, Florida, United States
Qualmedica Research, LLC
Evansville, Indiana, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) Occurred at the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration Sampled During a Dosing Interval (Tmax) of Plasma Dextroamphetamine (d-Amphetamine) and Plasma Levoamphetamine (l-Amphetamine)
Maximum plasma drug concentration occurred at time of maximum observed concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine during a dosing interval were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Trough Plasma Drug Concentration Ctrough at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine
Trough plasma drug concentration (predose concentrations collected at steady state) of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Predose on Day 1 and Day 28 and at 24 hours (Day 29) postdose on Day 28
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Drug Concentration (Tmax) During Dosing Interval of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine
Time to reach maximum observed plasma drug concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine during a dosing interval were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Timepoint (AUC0-t) During Sample Collection of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine
Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Ohio Pediatric Research Assn Inc
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Professional Psychiatric Services (PPS)
Mason, Ohio, United States
Coastal Pediatric Associates
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States
Clinical Neuroscience Solutions Inc
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Predose to Five Hours Postdose (AUC0-5) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine
Area under the concentration time curve from time zero predose to five hours postdose of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma d-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5 hours Postdose on Day 7
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time Five Hours to the Last Timepoint (AUC5-t) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine
Area under the concentration time curve from time five hours to the time of last quantifiable concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time of Dosing to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine
Area under the concentration-time curve from time of dosing to the last measurable concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (24 Hours) at Steady State (AUCtau,ss) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine
Area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (24 hours) at steady state of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Terminal Rate Constant (Lambda z) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine
Terminal Rate Constant of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Total Body Clearance (CL/F) for Extravascular Administration of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine
Apparent total clearance of the plasma drug concentration of plasma d- amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine after oral dose administration were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine
Time required for the plasma drug concentration to reach half of its original value of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vss/F) at Steady State of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine
Apparent volume of distribution at steady state of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine after oral dose administration were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: Predose, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24 hours (Day 8), 48 hours (Day 9) Postdose on Day 7
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs was defined as AEs that start or deteriorate on or after the date of the first dose of investigational product (IP) and no later than 3 days following the last dose of IP.
Time frame: From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (up to 5 weeks)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs
Vital sign assessments included blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate and body temperature. Any change in vital signs which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator were recorded as TEAE.
Time frame: From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (up to 5 weeks)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as TEAEs
12-lead ECG were evaluated. Any change in ECG assessments which are deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported as TEAE.
Time frame: From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (up to 5 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Height at Final On-Treatment Assessment
Height (in centimeters) was measured using a stadiometer with the participant standing on a flat surface without shoes and with the chin parallel to the floor. Final on-treatment assessment (FoTA) was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date).
Time frame: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Change From Baseline in Weight at Final On-Treatment Assessment
Weight (in kilograms) was measured using a calibrated scale. Participant should be in light clothes and without shoes. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date).
Time frame: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Results Reported as TEAEs
Clinical laboratory tests included biochemistry, endocrinology, hematology and urinalysis. Any change in clinical laboratory results which are deemed clinically significant by the investigator were reported as TEAE.
Time frame: From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (up to 5 weeks)
Number of Participants With Overall Quality of Sleep Assessed by Post Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) at Final On-Treatment Assessment
The PSQ was a 7-item questionnaire typically used to assess sleep quality with pharmacologic treatment. The questionnaire collected data on average time to sleep, sleep latency, frequency of interrupted sleep, duration of interrupted sleep, total sleep time and sleep quality over the last week. The assessment was done by the nature of the responses, not by a numbered scale. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date).
Time frame: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Length of Time Awake Per Night Assessed by PSQ at Final On-Treatment Assessment
The PSQ was a 7-item questionnaire typically used to assess sleep quality with pharmacologic treatment. The questionnaire collected data on average time to sleep, sleep latency, frequency of interrupted sleep, duration of interrupted sleep, total sleep time and sleep quality over the last week. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date).
Time frame: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Length of Time to Fall Asleep Per Night Assessed by PSQ at Final On-Treatment Assessment
The PSQ was a 7-item questionnaire typically used to assess sleep quality with pharmacologic treatment. The questionnaire collected data on average time to sleep, sleep latency, frequency of interrupted sleep, duration of interrupted sleep, total sleep time and sleep quality over the last week. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date).
Time frame: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Length of Time Sleeping Per Night Assessed by PSQ at Final On-Treatment Assessment
The PSQ was a 7-item questionnaire typically used to assess sleep quality with pharmacologic treatment. The questionnaire collected data on average time to sleep, sleep latency, frequency of interrupted sleep, duration of interrupted sleep, total sleep time and sleep quality over the last week. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date).
Time frame: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Total Sleep Disturbance Score of Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ ) at Final On-Treatment Assessment
The CSHQ was a validated, retrospective, parent-reported sleep screening tool. The questionnaire consisted of 35 items that yield a TSD score, as well as 8 subscale scores, including bedtime resistance, sleep duration, parasomnias, sleep disordered breathing, night wakings, daytime sleepiness, sleep anxiety, and sleep onset delay. Each item receives a score from 1 (meaning the problem occurs rarely) to 3 (meaning the problem usually occurs); therefore, a higher score is the worse outcome. Scale ranges are as follows: Bedtime Resistance: 6 to 18, Sleep Onset Delay: 1 to 3, Sleep Duration: 3 to 9, Sleep Anxiety: 4 to 12, Night Wakings: 3 to 9, Parasomnias: 7 to 21, Disordered Breathing: 3 to 9, Daytime Sleepiness: 8 to 24, and Total Disturbance (items from all scales): 33 to 99. A negative value indicated less sleep disturbance.
Time frame: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Number of Participants With a Positive Response in Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Final On-Treatment Assessment
C-SSRS was a semi-structured interview that captures the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts (suicidal ideation) and suicidal behaviors during the assessment period needed to be determine if a suicide-related thought or behavior were occurred. The assessment was done by the nature of the responses, not by a numbered scale. FoTA was defined as the last valid assessment obtained after baseline and while on IP (on or before 2 days after the last dose date).
Time frame: FoTA (up to Day 30)
Observed Analyte Concentration at 12 Hours After Dose Administration (C12) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine
Observed analyte concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine at 12 hours after dose administration were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: 12 hours (Day 8) Postdose on Day 7
Observed Analyte Concentration at 16 Hours After Dose Administration (C16) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l- Amphetamine
Observed analyte concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine at 16 hours after dose administration were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: 16 hours (Day 8) Postdose on Day 7
Observed Analyte Concentration at 24 Hours After Dose Administration (C24) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l- Amphetamine
Observed analyte concentration of plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine at 24 hours after dose administration were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: 24 hours (Day 8) Postdose on Day 7
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Five Hours to Twelve Hours Postdose (AUC5-12) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine
Area under the concentration-time curve from time five hours to twelve hours postdose (AUC5-12) in plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method.Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: 5, 8, 12 hours Postdose on Day 7
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Twelve Hours to Sixteen Hours Postdose (AUC12-16) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine
Area under the concentration-time curve from time twelve hours to sixteen hours postdose (AUC12-16) in plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: 12, 16 hours Postdose on Day 7
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Sixteen Hours to Twenty-Four Hours Postdose (AUC16-24) of Plasma d-Amphetamine and Plasma l-Amphetamine
Area under the concentration-time curve from time sixteen hours to twenty-four hours postdose (AUC16-24) in plasma d-amphetamine and plasma l-amphetamine were evaluated using rich sampling collection method. Values displayed do not necessarily reflect the actual precision obtained.
Time frame: Week 4: 16, 24 hours (Day 8) Postdose on Day 7