VISTA technique with PRF compared to MCAF technique with PRF to treat gingival recession
Comparison between two techniques for root coverage divided in two groups the first (test group) VISTA technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane and the second (control group)MCAF technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane for treating Miller's class I and II gingival recession defects. Clinical Periodontal Records will be taken at baseline, 3 months and 6 months respectively. Visual analogue scale for pain during one week after operation. Patient satisfaction record using questionnaire after 6 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
16
VISTA with PRF membrane includes Treatment of recession class I and II using autologous PRF membrane
modified coronally advanced flap with PRF membrane for Treatment of recession class I and II
Patient satisfaction
Using a questionnaire which are designed in a dichotomous fashion (yes or no ) and calculated by percentage of answering yes. it not a scale, the following questions will be asked to the patients; 1. did you feel pain in spite of the medication prescribed? 2. did you perceive the course of healing unexpected restriction? 3. did you experience any remaining symptoms of parasethesia? 4. would you described the under taken effort as reasonable? 5. have your expectations been fulfilled?
Time frame: after 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.