The main objective of the project is to compare the effectiveness and efficiency of innovative care through the IsereADOM home-care service package versus standard care in the prevention of unplanned hospitalizations in patients with cancer treatment. In accordance with the recommendations of the French High Authority of Health (HAS), a cost-utility analysis (ACU) will be implemented
Specific management of cancer patients involves carrying out often heavy treatments (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, interventional radiology, etc.) during which close coaching is necessary. In spite of this adapted follow-up, the natural evolution of the disease and the management of treatment tolerance make these patients a frail population, sometimes isolated, for which admission to emergency services and admission to full hospitalization can be required. This trial will use a service package at home named IsereADOM, currently in the development phase in the management of 4 types of populations: * Retired persons with no proven loss of autonomy; * Users with loss of autonomy at risk of falling; * Cardiac insufficiency; * Patients with cancer. This service package is based on the identification of a person of proximity, called "sentinel referent". This person, in charge of monitoring the patient at his / her home, has access to various connected tools installed at the patient's home (scales, tensiometer ...) as well as computer solutions enabling the sharing of information with the different actors in the management of the patient. In addition, the patient benefits from motivational coaching based on investigator's recommendation and telephone and internet information platforms.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
19
Objects connected to patients' homes (thermometer, weight scale, tensiometer +/- oximeter, glucose meter or pedometer), Digital liaison booklet, Sentinel referent, Motivational coaching
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
CHU Grenoble Alpes
Grenoble, France
Institut Daniel Hollard
Grenoble, France
Comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of innovative care with the IsereADOM home-care service package versus standard support
Comparison of the mean number of unplanned hospitalizations observed within 6 months of randomization.
Time frame: 6 months
Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio comparison
Evaluation of the costs of the home-care service package; Assessment of health care consumption from a community perspective; Calculation of the years of life gained in good health (QALY)
Time frame: 6 months
Budget impact analysis
Calculation of incremental costs and saved costs with the experimental strategy
Time frame: 6 months
Patient's condition evaluation
Evaluation in both arms of loss of autonomy with questionnaires "Activities of Daily Living"
Time frame: 6 months
Patient's condition evaluation
Evaluation in both arms of loss of autonomy with questionnaires "Instrumental Activities of Daily Living"
Time frame: 6 months
Patient's condition evaluation
Evaluation in both arms of anxiety with questionnaire "Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale"
Time frame: 6 months
Patient's condition evaluation
Evaluation in both arms of depression with questionnaire "Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale"
Time frame: 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Patient's condition evaluation
Evaluation in both arms of nutritional status by measuring albumin rate
Time frame: 6 months
Patient's condition evaluation
Evaluation in both arms of nutritional status by measuring prealbumin rate
Time frame: 6 months
Patient's condition evaluation
Evaluation in both arms of nutritional status by measuring weight
Time frame: 6 months
Patient's condition evaluation
Evaluation in both arms of the quality of life with questionnaire "EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels"
Time frame: 6 months
Patient's condition evaluation
Description in both arms of home care with questionnaire "RUD" for the natural caregivers
Time frame: 6 months
Patient's condition evaluation
Evaluation in both arms of consumption of unprogrammed care with patient's booklet
Time frame: 6 months
Patient's condition evaluation
Evaluation in both arms of overall survival
Time frame: 6 months
Patient's condition evaluation
Characterizing unjustified hospitalizations, to determine predictive factors for the efficiency of experimental management, progression-Free Survival
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluation of IsereADOM home-care service package impact
Evaluation of the duration of setting up the experimental procedure by measuring the delay between the randomisation and the complete installation of the home-care service package at the patient's home
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluation of IsereADOM home-care service package impact
Evaluation of the proportion of sentinel nurses asked to participate in the study
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluation of IsereADOM home-care service package impact
Evaluation of the number of calls and the number of connections to the telephone and Internet platforms
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluation of IsereADOM home-care service package impact
Evaluation of the number of refusal to participate.
Time frame: 6 months
Evaluation of IsereADOM home-care service package impact
Evaluation of the causes of refusal to participate.
Time frame: 6 months
Analysis of the geographical factors predicting the effectiveness of the package
Time frame: 6 months