The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of doravirine (also called MK-1439 or DOR) and doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (also called MK-1439A or DOR/3TC/TDF) in HIV-1-infected children and adolescents.
This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of DOR and DOR/3TC/TDF in HIV-1-infected children and adolescents. This study was conducted in two cohorts: Cohort 1 and Cohort 2. At study entry (Day 0), participants in Cohort 1 received a single dose of DOR added to their current HIV regimens. (The antiretroviral drugs in their current HIV regimens were not be provided by the study.) Participants in Cohort 1 underwent intensive PK evaluations, and had an additional study visit at Week 2. The study team in consultation with a Study Monitoring Committee evaluated data from Cohort 1 before enrolling participants in Cohort 2. Participants in Cohort 2 received DOR/3TC/TDF once daily from Day 0 through Week 96. They had study visits at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 64, 80, and 96. Study visits included physical examinations, PK evaluations, and blood and urine collection.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
55
100 mg of DOR administered orally
DOR/3TC/TDF administered orally as a fixed-dose combination (as a tablet, 100 mg/300 mg/300 mg) once daily
Participants in Cohort 1 received a combination of dolutegravir (DTG) or raltegravir (RAL) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The ARV drugs were prescribed by participants' own health care providers and were not provided by the study.
Univ. of Colorado Denver NICHD CRS
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Boston Medical Center Ped. HIV Program NICHD CRS
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital CRS
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Seattle Children's Research Institute CRS
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Single-dose Area-under-the-curve (AUC0-∞) of Doravirine (DOR) (Cohort 1)
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (WinNonlin version 6.3, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). Area under the curve (AUC) was determined using non-compartmental analyses and estimated by the linear up/log down trapezoidal rule, from time zero to infinity. Steady state AUC0-24 is equivalent to single dose AUC0-∞.
Time frame: Measured during the entry (day 0) visit. Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose, and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose.
PK Parameter: Single-dose Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of DOR (Cohort 1)
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (WinNonlin, version 6.3, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA).
Time frame: Measured during the entry (day 0) visit. Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose, and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose.
PK Parameter: Single-dose 24 Hour-concentration (C24hr) of DOR (Cohort 1)
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (WinNonlin, version 6.3, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA).
Time frame: Measured during the entry (day 0) visit. Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose, and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug
Percentage and Clopper-Pearson 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of participants with Grade 3 or higher AEs judged by the medical clinic as related to the study drug. AEs were graded based on the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table), Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017 (see References).
Time frame: Cohort 1: Measured from Day 0 through Week 2; Cohort 2: Measured from Day 0 through Week 24.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Seattle, Washington, United States
Soweto IMPAACT CRS
Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
Siriraj Hospital ,Mahidol University NICHD CRS
Bangkok, Bangkoknoi, Thailand
Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital NICHD CRS
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Chiang Mai University HIV Treatment (CMU HIV Treatment) CRS
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Assessed as Related to Study Drug
Percentage and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI of participants with SAEs judged by the medical clinic as related to the study drug. SAEs were reported according to Version 2.0 of the Manual for Expedited Reporting of Adverse Events to DAIDS (DAIDS EAE Manual) (see references).
Time frame: Cohort 1: Measured from Day 0 through Week 2; Cohort 2: Measured from Day 0 through Week 24.
Percentage of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events Assessed as Related to Study Drug
Percentage and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI of participants with permanent discontinuation of study drug due to AEs judged by the medical clinic as related to the study drug.
Time frame: Cohort 1: Measured from Day 0 through Week 2; Cohort 2: Measured from Day 0 through Week 24.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 5 Adverse Events (Death) Regardless of Relationship to Study Drug
Percentage and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI of participants with Grade 5 AEs (death) regardless of relationship to study drug.
Time frame: Cohort 1: Measured from Day 0 through Week 2; Cohort 2: Measured from Day 0 through Week 24.
PK Parameter: AUC0-24hr of DOR (Cohort 2)
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (WinNonlin, version 6.3, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). Area under the curve (AUC) was determined using non-compartmental analyses and estimated by the linear up/log down trapezoidal rule, from time zero to 24 hours. Intensive PK samples were collected for the first ten participants enrolled in Cohort 2.
Time frame: Measured at Week 1 visit. Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose, and at 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.
PK Parameter: AUC0-24hr of 3TC (Cohort 2)
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (WinNonlin, version 6.3, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). Area under the curve (AUC) was determined using non-compartmental analyses and estimated by the linear up/log down trapezoidal rule, from time zero to 24 hours. Intensive PK samples were collected for the first ten participants enrolled in Cohort 2.
Time frame: Measured at Week 1 visit. Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose, and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.
PK Parameter: AUC0-24hr of Tenofovir (Cohort 2)
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (WinNonlin, version 6.3, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). Area under the curve (AUC) was determined using non-compartmental analyses and estimated by the linear up/log down trapezoidal rule, from time zero to 24 hours. Intensive PK samples were collected for the first ten participants enrolled in Cohort 2.
Time frame: Measured at Week 1 visit. Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose, and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.
PK Parameter: Cmax of DOR (Cohort 2)
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (WinNonlin, version 6.3, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). Cmax was projected from individual plasma concentration-time profiles using the non-parametric superposition function in WinNonLin v6.3. Intensive PK samples were collected for the first ten participants enrolled in Cohort 2.
Time frame: Measured at Week 1 visit. Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose, and at 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.
PK Parameter: Cmax of 3TC (Cohort 2)
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (WinNonlin, version 6.3, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). Cmax was projected from individual plasma concentration-time profiles using the non-parametric superposition function in WinNonLin v6.3. Intensive PK samples were collected for the first ten participants enrolled in Cohort 2.
Time frame: Measured at Week 1 visit. Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose, and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.
PK Parameter: Cmax of Tenofovir (Cohort 2)
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (WinNonlin, version 6.3, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). Cmax was projected from individual plasma concentration-time profiles using the non-parametric superposition function in WinNonLin v6.3. Intensive PK samples were collected for the first ten participants enrolled in Cohort 2.
Time frame: Measured at Week 1 visit. Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose, and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.
PK Parameter: C24hr of DOR (Cohort 2)
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (WinNonlin, version 6.3, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). C24hr was projected from individual plasma concentration-time profiles using the non-parametric superposition function in WinNonLin v6.3. Intensive PK samples were collected for the first ten participants enrolled in Cohort 2.
Time frame: Measured at Week 1 visit. Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose, and at 2, 4, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.
PK Parameter: C24hr of 3TC (Cohort 2)
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (WinNonlin, version 6.3, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). C24hr was projected from individual plasma concentration-time profiles using the non-parametric superposition function in WinNonLin v6.3. Intensive PK samples were collected for the first ten participants enrolled in Cohort 2.
Time frame: Measured at Week 1 visit. Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose, and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.
PK Parameter: C24hr of Tenofovir (Cohort 2)
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using non-compartmental methods (WinNonlin, version 6.3, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). C24hr was projected from individual plasma concentration-time profiles using the non-parametric superposition function in WinNonLin v6.3. Intensive PK samples were collected for the first ten participants enrolled in Cohort 2.
Time frame: Measured at Week 1 visit. Blood samples were drawn at pre-dose, and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Cohort 2)
Virologic responses were assessed at week 24 as percentage (%) of participants and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI. Missing values were considered as failures for participants with missing data due to discontinuation of study drug as a result of virologic failure or for non-treatment related reasons with last available RNA \>200 copies/mL; otherwise participants with missing values were excluded.
Time frame: Measured at week 24.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Cohort 2)
Virologic responses were assessed at week 48 as percentage (%) of participants and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI. Missing values were considered as failures for participants with missing data due to discontinuation of study drug as a result of virologic failure or for non-treatment related reasons with last available RNA \>200 copies/mL; otherwise participants with missing values were excluded.
Time frame: Measured at week 48.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 200 Copies/mL at Week 96 (Cohort 2)
Virologic responses were assessed at week 96 as percentage (%) of participants and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI. Missing values were considered as failures for participants with missing data due to discontinuation of study drug as a result of virologic failure or for non-treatment related reasons with last available RNA \>200 copies/mL; otherwise participants with missing values were excluded.
Time frame: Measured at week 96.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Cohort 2)
Virologic responses were assessed at week 24 as percentage of participants and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI. Missing values were considered as failures for participants with missing data due to discontinuation of study drug as a result of virologic failure or for non-treatment related reasons with last available RNA \>50 copies/mL. Otherwise participants with missing values were excluded.
Time frame: Measured at week 24.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Cohort 2)
Virologic responses were assessed at week 48 as percentage of participants and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI. Missing values were considered as failures for participants with missing data due to discontinuation of study drug as a result of virologic failure or for non-treatment related reasons with last available RNA \>50 copies/mL. Otherwise participants with missing values were excluded.
Time frame: Measured at week 48.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL at Week 96 (Cohort 2)
Virologic responses were assessed at week 96 as percentage of participants and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI. Missing values were considered as failures for participants with missing data due to discontinuation of study drug as a result of virologic failure or for non-treatment related reasons with last available RNA \>50 copies/mL. Otherwise participants with missing values were excluded.
Time frame: Measured at week 96.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 40 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Cohort 2)
Virologic responses were assessed at week 24 as percentage (%) of participants and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI. Missing values were considered as failures for participants with missing data due to discontinuation of study drug as a result of virologic failure or for non-treatment related reasons with last available RNA \>40 copies/mL; Otherwise participants with missing values were excluded.
Time frame: Measured at week 24.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 40 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Cohort 2)
Virologic responses were assessed at week 48 as percentage (%) of participants and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI. Missing values were considered as failures for participants with missing data due to discontinuation of study drug as a result of virologic failure or for non-treatment related reasons with last available RNA \>40 copies/mL; Otherwise participants with missing values were excluded.
Time frame: Measured at week 48.
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than 40 Copies/mL at Week 96 (Cohort 2)
Virologic responses were assessed at week 96 as percentage (%) of participants and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI. Missing values were considered as failures for participants with missing data due to discontinuation of study drug as a result of virologic failure or for non-treatment related reasons with last available RNA \>40 copies/mL; Otherwise participants with missing values were excluded.
Time frame: Measured at week 96.
Summary of log10 Drop From Baseline to Week 24 in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (ART-naive Participants) (Cohort 2)
The differences between log10 HIV RNA at Week 24 minus at Day 0 are summarized.
Time frame: Measured at Day 0 and week 24.
Summary of log10 Drop From Baseline to Week 48 in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (ART-naive Participants) (Cohort 2)
The differences between log10 HIV RNA at Week 48 minus at Day 0 are summarized.
Time frame: Measured at Day 0 and week 48.
Summary of log10 Drop From Baseline to Week 96 in Plasma HIV-1 RNA (ART-naive Participants) (Cohort 2)
The differences between log10 HIV RNA at Week 96 minus at Day 0 are summarized.
Time frame: Measured at Day 0 and week 96.
Summary of Changes in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 24 (Cohort 2)
The mean difference is calculated as CD4 count at Week 24 minus CD4 count at Day 0 with associated 95% Clopper-Pearson CI.
Time frame: Measured at Day 0 and week 24.
Summary of Changes in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 48 (Cohort 2)
The mean differences is calculated as CD4 count at Week 48 minus CD4 count at Day 0 with associated 95% Clopper-Pearson CI.
Time frame: Measured at Day 0 and week 48.
Summary of Changes in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 96 (Cohort 2)
The mean difference is calculated as CD4 count at Week 96 minus CD4 count at Day 0 with associated 95% Clopper-Pearson CI.
Time frame: Measured at Day 0 and week 96.
Summary of Changes in CD4% From Baseline to Week 24 (Cohort 2)
The mean difference is calculated as CD4% at Week 24 minus CD4% at Day 0 with associated 95% Clopper-Pearson CI.
Time frame: Measured at Day 0 and week 24.
Summary of Changes in CD4% From Baseline to Week 48 (Cohort 2)
The mean difference is calculated as CD4% at Week 48 minus CD4% at Day 0 with associated 95% Clopper-Pearson CI.
Time frame: Measured at Day 0 and week 48.
Summary of Changes in CD4% From Baseline to Week 96 (Cohort 2)
The mean difference is calculated as CD4% at Week 96 minus CD4% at the Day 0 with associated 95% Clopper-Pearson CI.
Time frame: Measured at Day 0 and week 96.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Assessed as Related to Study Drug (Cohort 2) Through End of Study
Percentage and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI of participants with Grade 3 or higher AEs judged by the medical clinic as related to the study drug. AEs were graded based on the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table), Corrected Version 2.1, dated July 2017 (DAIDS) AE Grading table corrected version 2.1 (see References).
Time frame: Measured from Day 0 through Week 96.
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events Assessed as Related to Study Drug (Cohort 2) Through End of Study
Percentage and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI of participants with SAEs judged by the medical clinic as related to the study drug. SAEs were reported according to version 2.0 of the Manual for Expedited Reporting of Adverse Events to DAIDS (DAIDS EAE Manual) (see references).
Time frame: Measured from Day 0 through Week 96.
Percentage of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events Assessed as Related to Study Drug (Cohort 2) Through End of Study
Percentage and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI of participants with permanent discontinuation of study drug due to AEs judged by the medical clinic as related to the study drug.
Time frame: Measured from Day 0 through Week 96.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 5 Adverse Events (Death) Regardless of Relationship to Study Drug (Cohort 2) Through End of Study
Percentage and Clopper-Pearson 95% CI of participants with Grade 5 adverse events (death).
Time frame: Measured from Day 0 through Week 96.