The present study will be a multicenter, prospective phase II-study comparing efficacy of allogeneic SCT for patients with myelofibrosis who have a suitable stem cell donor after a 3 months Ruxolitinib induction therapy with patients who lack a suitable stem cell donor and will continue to receive Ruxolitinib.
This study is a multicenter, prospective phase II-study compares efficacy of allogeneic SCT for patients with myelofibrosis who have a suitable stem cell donor after a 3 months Ruxolitinib induction therapy with patients who lack a suitable stem cell donor and will continue to receive Ruxolitinib. In this study will further assess and compare the safety and efficacy of study treatments/ induction therapy in both study arms on spleen reduction, improvement of constitutional symptoms, QOL, toxicity, fibrosis regression, development of GvHD as well as chimerism, engraftment, relapse incidence, disease related mortality, outcome and overall survival.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
87
Universitätsklinkum Aachen
Aachen, Germany
HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch
Berlin, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, Germany
Event free survival
Compare to event free survival of patients at 3 years after allogeneic SCT and in Ruxolitinib continuous therapy in patients without a suitable donor
Time frame: 3 years
Spleen reduction
Ultrasound measurement Spleen size, reduction of Spleen size after 3 months Ruxolitinib induction therapy
Time frame: 3 months
Improvement of constitutional symptoms
Improvement of constitutional symptoms (Loose of weight and night sweat) after 3 months Ruxolitinib induction therapy, questionnaire, medical history
Time frame: 3 months
Improvement of bone marrow fibrosis
bone marrow histology, Improvement of bone marrow fibrosis after 3 months of Ruxolitinib induction therapy
Time frame: 3 months
Acute graft-versus-host disease
Incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease on Day +100 after allogeneic SCT according to the Glucksberg scale revised by Przepiorka
Time frame: Day +100 after allogeneic SCT
Chronic graft-versus-host disease
Incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease according to the NIH consensus criteria of Filipovich et al. at 1, 2 and 3 years after allogeneic SCT
Time frame: 1, 2 and 3 years after allogeneic SCT
Toxicity of Ruxolitinib
Toxicity of Ruxolitinib scored according to NCI CTCAE, Version 4.0
Time frame: till 3 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, Germany
Universitätsklinkum Halle
Halle, Germany
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Jena
Jena, Germany
Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Mainz, Germany
Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden
Minden, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Münster
Münster, Germany
...and 4 more locations
Toxicity of conditioning therapy
Toxicity of conditioning therapy scored according to NCI CTCAE, Version 4.0
Time frame: till 3 years
Relapse
Cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years after allogeneic SCT
Time frame: 3 years
Disease-related mortality
Disease-related mortality at 3 years after allogeneic SCT and Ruxolitinib continuous therapies
Time frame: 3 years
Non-relapsed mortality
Non-relapsed mortality at 1 and 3 years after allogeneic SCT and Ruxolitinib continuous therapy
Time frame: 1 and 3 years
Discontinuation rate
Discontinuation rate at 3 years after Ruxolitinib continuous therapy (End of study)
Time frame: 3 years
Evaluation of Sorror Risk Score
Evaluation of Sorror Risk Score on outcome after allogeneic SCT
Time frame: at baseline
Chimerism on relapse
Chimerism Analyse, Impact of chimerism on relapse incidence after allogeneic SCT
Time frame: 30d, 100d, 180 d, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Bone marrow fibrosis regression
bone marrow histology, Evaluation of bone marrow fibrosis regression after allogeneic SCT at 30d, 100d, 1 year, and 3 years
Time frame: 30d, 100d, 1 year, and 3 years
Bone marrow fibrosis regression
bone marrow histology, Evaluation of bone marrow fibrosis regression after Ruxolitinib continuous therapy at 30d, 100d, 1 year and 3 years
Time frame: 30d, 100d, 1 year and 3 years
Evaluation of QOL (FACT-BMT)
Questionnaire, Evaluation of QOL (FACT-BMT) before Ruxolitinib induction therapy (= baseline), at transplantation, and after transplantation at 6m, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Time frame: baseline, at transplantation, +180d, +1 year, +2 years and +3 years
Evaluation of QOL (MPN-SAF-TSS)
Questionaire, Evaluation of QOL (MPN-SAF-TSS) before Ruxolitinib induction therapy (= baseline), at transplantation, and after transplantation at 6m, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Time frame: baseline, at transplantation, +180d, +1 year, +2 years and +3 years
Evaluation of QOL (FACT-BMT)
Questionnaire, Evaluation of QOL (FACT-BMT) before Ruxolitinib induction therapy (= baseline), at confinement to Ruxolitinib continuous therapy and after confinement at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Time frame: baseline, confinement to Ruxolitinib continous therapy, +180d, +1 year, +2 years and +3 years
Evaluation of QOL (MPN-SAF-TSS)
Questionnaire, Evaluation of QOL (MPN-SAF-TSS) before Ruxolitinib induction therapy (= baseline), at confinement to Ruxolitinib continuous therapy and after confinement at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Time frame: baseline, confinement to Ruxolitinib continous therapy, +180d, +1 year, +2 years and +3 years
Overall Survival
Overall survival at 3 years after allogeneic SCT compared to Ruxolitinib continuous therapy in patients without a suit-able donor
Time frame: 3 years