The Vitamin C, Hydrocortisone and Thiamine in Patients With Septic Shock Trial

Overview

Sepsis has been characterised as a dysregulated host response to infection. Adjunctive therapies targeting the inflammatory cascade are being increasingly explored, although to date, have failed to demonstrate consistent benefit, and sepsis continues to manifest poor outcomes. Hospital mortality in patients with septic shock remains as high as 22% in Australia and New Zealand. From a global perspective, 31 million sepsis and 19 million severe sepsis cases are expected to be treated in hospitals all over the world per year. To date, experimental data have reported that both high dose intravenous vitamin C and corticosteroids attenuate the acceleration of the inflammatory cascade and possibly reduce the endothelial injury characteristic of sepsis, enhance the release of endogenous catecholamines and improve vasopressor responsiveness. Therefore, the investigators plan to conduct a feasibility pilot prospective, multi-centre, randomised, open-label, trial in ICU patients with septic shock to test whether the intravenous administration of high dose Vitamin C (6g/d), Thiamine (400mg/d) and Hydrocortisone (200mg/d) leads to a more rapid resolution shock and vasopressor dependence.

The investigators plan to conduct a feasibility pilot prospective, multi-centre, randomised, open-label, trial in ICU patients with septic shock to test whether the intravenous administration of high dose Vitamin C (6g/d), Thiamine (400mg/d) and Hydrocortisone (200mg/d) for a maximum of ten days leads to a more rapid resolution shock and vasopressor dependence. Hypothesis: Treatment with a combination of intravenous Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone reduces duration of vasopressor (measured by hours alive and vasopressor free) use censored at 7 days compared to standard care with Hydrocortisone alone. This is a prospective, feasibility, pilot, multi-centre, randomised, open-label controlled trial. This study will be performed in seven Victorian ICUs in Australia. Patients admitted to an ICU of the participating hospitals with the primary diagnosis of septic shock will be screened for inclusion into this study. Rationale: Experimental data have demonstrated that both corticosteroids and intravenous vitamin C attenuate the release of pro-inflammatory mediators, reduce the endothelial injury characteristic of sepsis (thereby reducing endothelial permeability and improving microcirculatory flow), augment the release of endogenous catecholamines and enhance vasopressor responsiveness. In animal models, these effects have resulted in reduced organ injury and increased survival. However, their effect in critically ill humans is unknown. Previous research suggests that vitamin C and glucocorticoids may act synergistically and improve vasopressor responsiveness in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Randomisation: ICU patients will be enrolled as soon as possible but no later than 24 hours after fulfilling the criteria for septic shock. Patients will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the treatment group, receiving intravenous Vitamin C (1.5g every 6 hours), Thiamine (200mg every 12 hours) and Hydrocortisone (50mg every 6 hours), or to the control group, receiving Hydrocortisone (50mg every 6 hours) alone. Treatment allocation will occur using a computerized system and concealed allocation. The clinical staff involved in patient care will administer the additional drugs to those allocated to the treatment arm of the trial as soon as possible after the identification of septic shock and randomization. Patients readmitted to ICU during the same hospital stay will not receive any further doses of study drugs. Study Treatment will continue until: * Septic shock resolves * The patient leaves the ICU * Contraindications to Vitamin C, Thiamine or Hydrocortisone therapy arise * Death occurs * A maximum of 10 days of treatment has been administered * Serious adverse events suspected to be secondary to the intervention therapy develop. Study Drugs This study will be an open label study: Intervention group: * 1500mg Vitamin C is will be diluted in 100ml of Normal Saline (0.9% NaCl) and infused over 1 hour. The dosing schedule is 1500mg every 6 hours for the duration of study treatment. * 200mg Thiamine will be diluted in 100ml of Normal Saline (0.9% NaCl) and infused over 1 hour. The dosing schedule is 200mg every 12 hours. Patients in the control group of the study can receive thiamine if clinically indicated at the discretion of the attending ICU staff specialist. In both groups (treatment and control), patients will be treated with hydrocortisone 50mg IV q 6 hourly for the duration of study treatment. After shock resolution and/or a maximum fo 7 days Hydrocortisone will be tapered off or stopped. Statistical analysis: Originally, the investigators assumed a mean (SD) duration of vasopressor dependency of 50 (28) hours and estimated a required sample size of 120 patients (60 per group) to identify a clinically relevant decrease of vasopressor dependency and an increase in days alive and vasopressor free at 7 days of 25% (20 hours) (i.e. increase from 41 to 55 hours of days alive and vasopressor free at day 7) with a power of 90% at an alpha level of 0.05. The investigators have recalculated the sample size based on the pooled standard deviation of hours alive and vasopressor free of the first 59 participants. The pooled standard deviation of hours alive and vasopressor free at 7 days for the 59 patients is 51.6 hours. To have a 90% power (2 sided p-value of 0.05) to detect a 25-hour difference based on a standard deviation of 51.6, the trial will require 180 patients (90 per group). Allowing for a 20% inflation for non-normality and dropout/withdrawal, the required total sample size is 216 (108 per group). The robustness of the sample size estimate will be further assessed after recruitment of 108 patients (50% of the sample size). Consent: The major ethical issues associated with this study relate involve the recruitment of participants who are dependent on medical care and in need of immediate intervention for the management of life-threatening haemodynamic instability. 1. Informed consent from participant or substitute/medical treatment decision maker: Where possible, and as authorised by law, which varies between jurisdictions, consent will be obtained from the participant himself or from the participant's legal surrogate if the patient lacks decision-making capacity. 2. Consent to continue: Where it is not possible or practicable for the patient or the legal surrogate to consider the study and give consent immediately, the patient may be enrolled with a waiver of consent (or medical research procedures in an emergency in Victoria) and consent obtained from the participant's legal surrogate as soon as possible, provided the procedure is in accord with the requirements of the site's Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) and applicable legislation. When appropriate, the participant's legal surrogate, and, in turn, the participant, will be informed of the study and will be able to withdraw consent for ongoing participation at any time. 3. Verbal/Telephone consent: In cases where the participant's legal surrogate cannot attend the hospital to sign the consent form within the time constraints of the study, consent for patient participation in the study may be obtained over the telephone in accordance with local HREC guidelines. The telephone conversation must be documented in the patient's medical record. As soon as the participant's legal surrogate is able to attend the hospital, they will be asked to sign a consent form and note that telephone consent was already provided. Once subjects are recovered and are able to consider the information sheet, they will be offered the opportunity to withdraw from study follow-up. If a participant dies due to the nature of their critical illness before consent was able to be obtained from the person responsible/medical treatment decision maker, then consent will not be sought and data collected will be used. This is in line with the process followed by other similar intensive care studies conducted previously and approved by the relevant HRECs all where consent to continue has been utilised.